Legacy: reply
+311
Legacy: reply
+401
Abortion and Planned Parenthood are the places for this
-140
What if Wikipedia editors were to remove some instances of bias?: reply
+224
PP is ignoring her eugenics activism to comment on her birth control activism; like things go together. Additionally, the number of abortions performed yearly doesn't have anything to do with Sanger.
-140
Sanger and Abortion: *sigh*
+517
Knock it off. Please don't let your agenda override the facts.
-140
This needs a lot of cleanup to ditch the sarcasm, but let's at least put it somewhere relevant for the time being
-8
Disease and contraception: reply
+166
They're linked topics; she wanted eugenic controls to enforce racial purity. It's not going to be practical to split the description
-2
What if Wikipedia editors were to remove some instances of bias?: reply
+98
Be more specific and fix conversational tone
+101
This one topic, and I need to cite the reference I had on what she was talking to the KKK womens' corps about
-12
The Hope Clinic reference and the "propaganized" version of the lead: reply
+864
Hope Clinic actually makes the factually incorrect claim that she founded the Birth Control Federation of America, which never existed. I'll add a ref for her founding of the ABCL tomorrow.
-99
They were not an emo band
-8
What if Wikipedia editors were to remove some instances of bias?: reply
+1,296
replies
+1,123
What if Wikipedia editors were to remove some instances of bias?: reply
+1,347
new question: reply
+102
What if Wikipedia editors were to remove some instances of bias?: reply
+139
The Hope Clinic reference and the "propaganized" version of the lead
+1,702
Birth control activism: Eh, this is redundant, and opening the clinic wasn't illegal; operating it was
-10
Hope Clinic railing against her 80 years after the fact does not override her own writing. Also, a factually incorrect claim that she founded PP is not more important than her nationality and activism
+18
Number 65: reply
+308
What if Wikipedia editors were to remove some instances of bias?: reply
+388
Let's not be disingenuous
+2,544
Sources: See talk; she isn't an advocate, but an impassioned opponent!
-10
not a fan of this particular evasion, but it's apparently house style
m+15
That's probably hard to support; she argued for the management of families in general
-24
Sanger and Abortion: oops
mSanger and Abortion: reply
+1,181
Category:Abortion: some stuff I've found in research
+663
Sanger and Abortion: reply
+345
mention NBCL
+38
What's with the hysterical tone? Let's also get the eugenics, birth control, nationality and feminism all in the first sentence, then sort the rest into rough chron order
+13
replies
+1,578
You've eliminated mention of her nationality, mentioned blacks twice, added the awkward and archaic "publically discoursed," and credit her for Planned Parenthood when PP is several groups merged.:/
-21
more
+665
Let's specify; she was campaigning eugenics in the US to be applied to immigrants
+19
added one ref, plus her specific racial feelings
+296
Category:Abortion: reply
+187
Sources: Redundant; advocates is in the overcat
-23
noted is redundant, here; if she weren't noted, there wouldn't be an article
m-5
oops
m+1
This lead is based on the sources; I'll do digging for more on what races she actually hated (the internet is being really unhelpful on this point)
+212