Conservapedia talk:Major bias in conservapedia

Surely you can see this is going to fail dismally... do you really think the sysops are going to let this stand? I agree it would do some good towards the health of this place to promote a more objective and less censored point of view, but judging by the speed and ruthless ignorance with which they delete and modify articles, I don't see this ever happening. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mark4 (talk)

Can I add to this article so that it becomes substantial rather than something to be deleted? Will that get me banned?--AmesG 10:16, 19 March 2007 (EDT)

Jeez guys, you make my life hard enough. Can you stop making articles about the bias? Please? We all know the site has a bias. Its called CONSERVApedia. Hint Hint, its a conservative website. Either play nice, or I will start dropping the Ban Hammer. If you wanna whine and moan, go to the debate page. If you have a problem with the content, edit it. Its a wiki after all. Just make them factual and not about the sex organs of Republicans. So basically, fight nice.--Elamdri 11:01, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

Elamdri, please watch your language. I find the first word in your post offensive. .--Rafael

haha, rafael you crack me up. Jrssr5 22:09, 5 April 2007 (EDT)