Conservapedia talk:Length of articles
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Mr. Schlafly wrote:
- MountainDew's point is excellent, and I wholeheartedly agree. I've even warned users for adding to many "stubs". Wikipedia inserts these eyesores anywhere and everywhere. If an article is short, why do we need a glaring eyesore to say that? It's obvious the article is short.
- Moreover, we like conciseness here. We're not like Wikipedia, which implicitly acts like more words is better. A short entry is often a better entry. [1]