Conservapedia:AFD LeftyGreenMario

Why do we need an article about a harmless RationalWiki administrator? Out of all "ratvandals," one would think that culprits like Trent Toulouse, David Gerard, Ace McWicked, or some other long-term vandal of Conservapedia would be worthy exposing. LeftyGreenMario is another random modern liberal activist, probably from a blue state, who happens to enjoy Mario games? So? —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 20:36, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

I think she belongs in a separate space, Rationallwiki:LeftyGreenMario.

Btw, she evidently has some inbreeding among her progenitors which she's very sensitive about. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 20:39, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

Conservapedia commandment #3: "Any content you create or change (including edits, new pages, images and links) must be informative, family-friendly, clean, concise, and without gossip or foul language." (from Conservapedia:Commandments)

Your claim that LGM "has some inbreeding among her progenitors" is unsubstantiated, and if proven false, vile slander. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 20:42, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

I got the diffs or I wouldn't have posted it. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 20:45, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

Then post the revision difference links. Go on ahead! The fact you did not it initially is telling. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 20:46, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

The links need text and context. I am just mentioning that I have the poop if anyone's interested. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 20:47, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

Still unable to post the "evidence," eh? Hmm, I wonder why. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 20:51, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

Seems like you're trolling me. That is typical Ratvandal behavior. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 20:59, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

Let's review the rap sheet: A prevailing Trentist characteristic is to lazily copy/paste the writing style of another user in a discussion, such as here. You did the exact same thing here, indicating that you copy the behavior of RW goon Trent. Your hypocritical accusations against me thereby hold less weight than your overgrown shadow. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 21:03, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

The problem Conservapedia has is too many Lone Wolf editors, and no cooperation or Teamwork. This is largely due to the damage done by the Rationalwiki psyop operation in the early days, which has survived and become institutionalized as Conservapedia policy. It survives without their presence. The idea is to keep CP editors at each other's throats, untrusting and suspicious of each other's motivations. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 21:11, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

Notice now,User:Conservative advocating for a mobocracy again. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 21:15, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

Oh, I see: the moment your own hypocrisy is exposed on full public display, you would just like to deflect to another issue. I'm sure this is a complete coincidence, right? Right? Imagine the sheer horror of owning up to your faults instead of serving the will of your father the devil! —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 21:22, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

• Delete - She is a nobody. If we wanted to cover someone, Dyskliver is someone to cover because he is trouble. Ditto for Keegscee and Oxyaena. To be honest though, I'd rather us not cover them at all; the site itself doesn't even really meet the notability guidelines for Wikipedia (the attention is does get is likely in large part due its search rankings being boosted by the site having a Wikipedia article, hence why the rats work butt over apple cart to make sure that article doesn't get deleted), and we're trying to be a conservative Wikipedia, so why cover non-notable moderators of a non-notable site? DMorris (talk) 22:16, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

Man, you almost took the words right out of my mouth. If we need articles exposing RationalWiki, it should be about their content, not focusing primarily on their users in such a personal way especially if they're comparably harmless. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 22:21, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

Thanks, LGM is actually one of the more sane ones, if there is such a thing. But she's still a loser like the rest of them. DMorris (talk) 22:35, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

In part, concurred once more. Unlike GrammarCommie, LGM has little serious rage issues, and unlike the Trentist or Gerardist pseudo-schools of thought, she appears relatively reasonable to debate history topics with. Speaking of history, I debunked one of RationalWiki's recent claims over here, if you're interested in taking a look. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 22:42, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

• Delete. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 22:20, September 16, 2023 (EDT)
• Delete. Another victim on User:Conservative's hit list (personally, I'm not fond of Lefty - she's the one who conspired to get me banned from RW. Her & Cons are twins of sorts in their motivations). I'm not interested in reading any of this because of the reputation of the author. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 17:12, September 23, 2023 (EDT)