Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights Organization

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights Organization, 441 U.S. 600, 617 (1979), the U.S. Supreme Court held that:

"One cannot go into court and claim a 'violation of § 1983' -- for § 1983 by itself does not protect anyone against anything."

Instead, there must be another law that grants a substantive right to someone upon which a Section 1983 claim is based.

In this case the Court held that its jurisdiction does not encompass a claim that a state welfare regulation is invalid because it conflicts with the Social Security Act.