Category talk:Psychology

A lot of these articles are useless, just filled with buzzwords, like the Humanistic psychology article. --Ed Poor 15:38, 30 April 2007 (EDT)

Amen to that. Or linked to a Mark Miller playlist with 'experts' who can't even spell what they are talking about. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 13:48, June 26, 2025 (EDT)

Another Mark Miller "expert" can't even spell whatever she's supposedly holds expertise in on the Conservapedia educational resource webserver.

Question: Did the doctor commit the spelling error or was it a video editor on her team?

""Style over substance" is a logical fallacy where someone prioritizes the presentation or delivery of an argument over its actual content or logical reasoning. It occurs when the way something is said or presented is considered more important than whether the claims are actually true or well-supported."[1]

Please endeavor to put forth factual and logical arguments. Conservative (talk) 16:23, July 20, 2025 (EDT)

What makes you think she's got a team? Looks like she can't even afford an office. RobS^{Zelensky Must Go!} 16:33, July 20, 2025 (EDT)

I didn't claim she has a team. I just threw out the question. Furthermore, the style over substance fallacy you committed shows how poor and illogical your "argument" was. Conservative (talk) 16:37, July 20, 2025 (EDT)

bla bla bla you're not going to spam your way out of this mess.