Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Vietnam War

12,006 bytes added, 03:14, March 11, 2022
citation
{{War
| image =SaigonFall.jpg
| conflict =
| date =1959-1975
| location =[[Vietnam]]
| combatant1 ='''Anticommunist Forces'''<br/>[[South Vietnam]]<br/>[[United States]]
| combatant2 ='''Communist Forces'''<br/>[[North Vietnam]]<br/>[[Khmer Rouge]]<br/>[[Pathet Lao]]<br/>[[Viet Cong]]
| commander1 = [[Ngo Dinh Diem]] <br/> [[John F. Kennedy]]<br/>[[Lyndon Johnson]]<br/>[[Robert McNamara]]<br/>[[William Westmoreland]] <br/> [[Richard Nixon]]<br/>Nguyen Van Thieu
| commander2 = [[Ho Chi Minh]]<br/>Le Duan<br/>Hoang Van Thai
| strength1 = around 1,420,000 (1968)
| strength2 = around 860,000 (1968)
| casualties1 =
| casualties2 =
}}
 
[[Image:SaigonFall.jpg|thumb|South Vietnamese residents flee [[Saigon]], as North Vietnamese forces enter the city.]]
The '''Vietnam War,''' also known as the Second Indochina War or The American War (in Vietnam), was fought principally between [[North Vietnamese]] [[Communist]] troops and [[South Vietnamese]] forces supported by American soldiers. The war was basically a fight over whether South Vietnam should have a an [[Atheism|atheistic]], Communist government, part of a "hot war" in the ongoing [[Cold War]] between the US and the Soviets.Officially, Vietnam is an atheist state.<ref>Jan Dodd, Mark Lewis, Ron Emmons. The Rough Guide to Vietnam, Vol. 4, 2003. p. 509: "After 1975, the Marxist-Leninist government of reunified Vietnam declared the state atheist while theoretically allowing people the right to practice their religion under the constitution."</ref>
The war was in progress more or less continuously since the surrender of [[Japan]], which occupied Vietnam during [[World War II]], in 1945. [[Ho Chi Minh]], an operative of the [[Comintern]] (the Soviet organization charged with promoting Marxist-Leninist Marxist–Leninist revolution around the world),<ref>[http://www.triumphforsaken.com/index.php?pr=Excerpt Triumph Forsaken], book by [[Mike Moyar]]</ref> led the movement for a unified, [[Communist]] Vietnam from 1941 on. He served as the dictator of North Vietnam until the late fifties, though he remained the figurehead president. He remained a popular icon of the New Left around the world, despite heading a totalitarian dictatorship and supporting the slaughter murdering hundreds of millions thousands of people.
==Prelude==
During World War II the Japanese occupied Vietnam and disarmed the French. With the vacuum caused by the defeat of Japan, an opportunity arose for the Communists to declare the "independence" of Vietnam in 1945. No nation recognized the new regime and the French returned and swept it away, with remnants hiding in the mountains. The [[United States]] backed France and its puppet emperor [[Bao Dai]]. [[Ho Chi Minh]] began a campaign to fight a weakened France and seize independence through force. France's economy was shattered by the war and so by 1953, 80% of the money and material used by Bao Dai's troops came from the United States. Nonetheless, in early 1954 French were defeated at the [[Battle of Dien Bien Phu]] over many months when the fortress was overrun by a well-forged Vietnamese fighting force. More than 500,000 Vietnamese died in this conflict with France (the First Indochina War). The survival rate for French soldiers in Communist POW camps was comparable to the rates of survival in the Dachau concentration camp during the [[Holocaust]]. The French sued for peace at talks in [[Geneva]], the upshot of which was the creation of four independent countries in their former colony of [[Indochina]]: [[Cambodia]], [[Laos]], [[North Vietnam]] and [[South Vietnam]]. North Vietnam was run by Ho Chi Minh as a totalitarian Communist dictatorship, while the South was run based on the Western model. Neither side respected the legitimacy of the other; as a consequence, the division was widely regarded as temporary. A British diplomat suggested that free elections be held in the North and South to determine the future of a unified Vietnam. Contrary to commonly repeated myths; it was North Vietnam, not South Vietnam, that was the most extreme and steadfast in its efforts to prevent any such election from taking place. Nevertheless, it is true that South Vietnam consistently opposed all such arguments, claiming that the majority of South Vietnamese wanted independence, but that those North Vietnamese who wanted conquest should not be allowed to veto their just demands. The United States was willing to accept free elections and a reunified Vietnam, Communist-led and hostile to China. Indeed, US officials ''favored'' such a default outcome; they listed it in secret communications never intended for public consumption (but released in the Pentagon Papers) under the heading "advantages."<ref>The Pentagon Papers (Beacon Press, 1971), vol. 3, p661.</ref> The US gradually intervened, due to the insistence of the North on a campaign of military aggression, as part of its wider Cold War strategy of containment.
Unwilling to accept or even consider free electionsThe French sued for peace at talks in [[Geneva]], and with the South's economy growing rapidly and its prospects looking brighter by upshot of which was the daycreation of four independent countries in their former colony of [[Indochina]]: [[Cambodia]], [[Laos]], [[North Vietnam]] and [[South Vietnam]]. North Vietnam was run by Ho Chi Minh was up against as a wall. A unity government was established in Laostotalitarian Communist dictatorship, and while the US was firmly committed to defending South Vietnam from conquestwas run based on the Western model. Huge numbers Neither side respected the legitimacy of the other; as a consequence, the division was widely regarded as temporary. A British diplomat suggested that free elections be held in the North Vietnamese desperately fled and South to determine the future of a unified Vietnam. South for freedomVietnam consistently opposed such arguments on the grounds that free elections were impossible in the communist North. Cambodia The United States was neutral willing to accept free elections and united behind the rule of [[Sihanouk]]a reunified Vietnam, Communist-led and hostile to China. Despite repeated diplomatic efforts by the Indeed, US to bring about officials ''favored'' such a peaceful regional settlementdefault outcome; Hanoi became increasingly convinced that they listed it in secret communications never intended for public consumption (but released in the revolution could be spread throughout Indochina only by forcePentagon Papers) under the heading "advantages."<ref>The Pentagon Papers (Beacon Press, 1971), vol. 3, p661.</ref> The US gradually intervened, due to the insistence of the North on a campaign of military aggression, as part of its wider Cold War strategy of containment.
From 1956 to 1959, the North Vietnamese Communists (who would ultimately kill at ''least'' half a million and as many as 1.5 million North Vietnamese citizens<ref>http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/SOD.CHAP6.HTM</ref>) embarked on a ruthless "land reform" A unity government was established in which upwards of 50Laos,000 people were slaughtered in a series of violent killings and purges by the stateUS was firmly committed to defending South Vietnam from conquest.<ref>http://www.vietnam.ttu.edu/events/1996_Symposium/96papers/story.htm</ref> In addition to these executions, untold tens Huge numbers of thousands were worked North Vietnamese desperately fled to death in concentration campsthe South for freedom. Although most scholars estimate Cambodia was neutral and united behind the deaths were in the tens if not scores rule of thousands; President [[Nixon]] claimed that, based on US intelligence (which may have been faulty), up to 500,000 had been executed and 500,000 worked to death in these three years aloneSihanouk.<ref>http://www.vietnam.ttu.edu/events/1996_Symposium/96papers/story.htm</ref> Domestic repression escalated dramatically, and Despite repeated diplomatic efforts by the only free paper in North Vietnam was shut down after writing: 'If somebody tells me US to keep my mouth shut in case the Americans and Diem should make capital out of what I say, I reply: "Diem has bring about a very good case when he refuses to hold joint consultations with us on peaceful regional settlement; Hanoi became increasingly convinced that the ground that there is no freedom in North Vietnam."'<ref>http://www.vietnam.ttu.edu/events/1996_Symposium/96papers/storyrevolution could be spread throughout Indochina only by force.htm</ref>
In 1959===The North Vietnamese Terror===During the twenties and thirties, Hanoi's politburo received a series Communist forces waged an insurrection of mass murder and terrorism in an effort to seize power in Vietnam. The communist Viet Minh collaborated with French colonial forces to massacre supporters of reports indicating that even though the North had been directing a phase one guerrilla insurgency Vietnamese nationalist movements in the South for two years, forties. When the South was socially and economically Viet Minh went to war against France they continued their campaign to wipe out-pacing the Northnationalist groups. "By Tet of 1959 (America refused to back the French against the communists until 1950.)<ref>Robert F. Turner," William Colby writes in his bookVietnamese Communism: Its Origins and Development (Hoover Institution Press, Lost Victory1975), "it was plain that a nationalist and nonpp57-Communist 9, 67-9, 74 and “Myths of the Vietnam was firmly established. It was also becoming apparent that its future wasWar, if anything” Southeast Asian Perspectives, more promising than September 1972, pp14-8</ref> The Japanese invasion of French Indochina proved to be a catalyst for Vietnamese independence, as it united the gray and regimented society in Vietnamese people behind the NorthCommunist resistance to imperial domination. In 1953, Ho launched a "rent reduction" campaign in which communist planners decided to massacre 1 out of every 1,000 North Vietnamese.<ref>Alec Holcombe, [http://www.vietnamjstor.ttu.eduorg/eventsdiscover/1996_Symposium10.1525/96papers/storyvs.2010.5.2.243?searchUrl=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3Ffilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj50000660%26Query%3Drent%2Breduction%26wc%3Don%26Search.x%3D0%26Search.y%3D0&Search=yes&uid=3739656&uid=367529381&uid=2134&uid=2&uid=70&uid=3&uid=3739256&uid=60&sid=21101672198221 Politburo's Directive Issued on May 4, 1953, on Some Special Issues regarding Mass Mobilization] ''Journal of Vietnamese Studies'', Vol. 5, No. 2 (Summer 2010), pp. 243-247, quoting a translated Politburo directive from May 4, 1953. This directive was published in Complete Collection of Party Documents (Van Kien Dang Toan Tap), a 54 volume work authorized by the Vietnamese Communist Party.htm</ref>
From mid 1953 to early 1956, the North Vietnamese Communists embarked on a ruthless "land reform" in which landowners, dissidents, and French collaborators were slaughtered en masse in a "genocide triggered by class discrimination."<ref name="rfa.org">http://www.rfa.org/english/news/vietnam_landreform-20060608.html</ref> Declassified Politburo documents confirm that 1 in 1,000 North Vietnamese (i.e., about 14,000 people) were the minimum quota targeted for execution during the earlier "rent reduction" campaign; the number killed during the multiple stages of the considerably more radical "land reform" was probably many times greater.<ref>Alec Holcombe, [http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.1525/vs.2010.5.2.243?searchUrl=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3Ffilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj50000660%26Query%3Drent%2Breduction%26wc%3Don%26Search.x%3D0%26Search.y%3D0&Search=yes&uid=3739656&uid=367529381&uid=2134&uid=2&uid=70&uid=3&uid=3739256&uid=60&sid=21101672198221 Politburo's Directive Issued on May 4, 1953, on Some Special Issues regarding Mass Mobilization] ''Journal of Vietnamese Studies'', Vol. 5, No. 2 (Summer 2010), pp. 243-247, quoting a translated Politburo directive from May 4, 1953. This directive was published in [http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.1525/vs.2010.5.2.225?uid=3739656&uid=367529381&uid=2134&uid=2&uid=70&uid=3&uid=3739256&uid=60&sid=21101672298091 Complete Collection of Party Documents] (Van Kien Dang Toan Tap), a 54 volume work authorized by the Vietnamese Communist Party.</ref> In 1957, during its "Rectification of Errors" campaign, North Vietnam admitted that it had wrongly executed about 15,000 communist cadre during the "land reform", and that 30% of the "landlords" executed were party members; i.e., that about 50,000 people were executed in total.<ref>''Nhan Dan,'' August 13, 1957.</ref><ref>''Time,'' July 1, 1957, p. 13, says they were given a proper burial.</ref><ref>Gittinger, J. Price, [http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/3024603?uid=3739656&uid=2134&uid=367529391&uid=2&uid=70&uid=3&uid=367529381&uid=3739256&uid=60&sid=21101618662091 "Communist Land Policy in Viet Nam"], ''Far Eastern Survey'', Vol. 29, No. 8, 1957, p. 118.</ref><ref>Lam Thanh Liem (1990), [http://www.paulbogdanor.com/left/vietnam/landreform.html "Chinh sach cai cach ruong dat cua Ho Chi Minh: sai lam hay toi ac?"] in Jean-Francois Revel et al., ''Ho Chi Minh'', Nam A, pp. 179-214. "Vo Nhan Tri found and read a top-secret report on the number of communist cadres falsely accused and executed: 15,000."</ref> Lam Thanh Liem, a major authority on land issues in Vietnam, conducted multiple interviews in which communist cadres independently confirmed that 20-30% of those executed were actually fellow communists, but gave higher estimates for executions ranging from 120,000 to 200,000. Such figures match the "nearly 150,000 houses and huts which were allocated to new occupants".<ref>Lam Thanh Liem (1990), [http://www.paulbogdanor.com/left/vietnam/landreform.html "Chinh sach cai cach ruong dat cua Ho Chi Minh: sai lam hay toi ac?"] in Jean-Francois Revel et al., ''Ho Chi Minh'', Nam A, pp. 179-214.</ref><ref>Dommen, Arthur J. (2001), [https://books.google.com/books?id=MauWlUjuWNsC&pg=PA340#v=onepage&q&f=false ''The Indochinese Experience of the French and the Americans''], Indiana University Press, p. 340, quotes comparable figures for communist cadre executed.</ref> Official records from the time suggest that 172,008 "landlords" were killed during the "land reform", of whom 123,266 (71.66%) were later found to be wrongly classified.<ref>''The History of the Vietnamese Economy'' (2005), Vol. 2, edited by Dang Phong of the Institute of Economy, Vietnamese Institute of Social Sciences. Landlords were classified as 5.68% of the population, but only a fraction of them were killed. These figures are proportionally comparable to those for China's land reform, in which millions of "landlords" were slaughtered.</ref> The full death toll was even greater because victims' families starved to death under the "policy of isolation."<ref>''Nhan Vhan,'' November 5, 1956: "In the agrarian reform, illegal arrests, imprisonments, investigations (with barbarous torture), executions, requisitions of property, and '''the quarantining of landowners’ houses''' (or houses of peasants wrongly classified as landowners), which left innocent children to die of starvation, are not exclusively due to the shortcomings of the leadership, but also due to the lack of a complete legal code. If the cadres had felt that they were closely observed by the god of justice... calamities might have been avoided for the masses." Nhan Vhan was one of the best-known opposition periodicals that was allowed during the three-month period of relative intellectual freedom in the fall of 1956, modeled on Mao's "Hundred Flowers" campaign.</ref> As communist defector Le Xuan Giao explained: "There was nothing worse than the starvation of the children in a family whose parents were under the control of a land reform team. They isolated the house, and the people who lived there would starve. The children were all innocent. There was nothing worse than that. They wanted to see the whole family dead."<ref name="Turner">Turner, Robert F. [http://www.paulbogdanor.com/deniers/vietnam/turner.pdf "Expert Punctures 'No Bloodbath' Myth"]. ''[[Human Events]],'' November 11, 1972.</ref> In 1959, Hanoi's politburo received a series of reports indicating that even though the North had been directing a phase one guerrilla insurgency in the South for two years, the South was socially and economically out-pacing the North. "By Tet of 1959," [[William Colby]] writes in his book, ''Lost Victory'', "it was plain that a nationalist and non-Communist Vietnam was firmly established. It was also becoming apparent that its future was, if anything, more promising than the gray and regimented society in the North."<ref name="vietnam.ttu.edu">http://www.vietnam.ttu.edu/events/1996_Symposium/96papers/story.htm</ref>  In response, the North decided to rapidly escalate the campaign to conquer South Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia using the Ho Chi Minh trail. To "hide" the fact that "there had been an invasion from the North," as one North Vietnamese commander openly admitted, seemingly indigenous forces were deployed in the initial phases of the conflict. Originally part of the [[Vietminh]] and honorary branches of the North Vietnamese army; groups of Cambodian (the [[Khmer Rouge]]), Laotian (the [[Pathet Lao]]), and South Vietnamese (the [[Vietcong]]) Communists were dispatched by the North to overthrow the governments of their respective countries. Thousands of North Vietnamese troops overtly aided them by providing arms and training, and by invading and occupying large chunks of Cambodia and Laos to assist them. By 1961 northern Communists were assassinating one hundred southern hamlet, village, and/or district officials each month. By 1962 that figure had grown to one thousand per month.<ref>http://www.name="vietnam.ttu.edu"/events/1996_Symposium/96papers/story.htm</ref>
The atrocities escalated rapidly with no end in sight. By 1965, the guerilla war was largely over, and the army of North Vietnam was using conventional warfare to try and overrun Cambodia and South Vietnam. The US began sending military advisors to South Vietnam in 1950. By 1965, it reluctantly decided to commit combat troops to prevent a Communist takeover.
 
The Viet Cong massacres were described as follows:
<blockquote>
The village chief and his wife were distraught. One of their children, a seven-year-old boy, had been missing for four days. They were terrified, they explained to Marine Lt. Gen. Lewis W. Walt, because they believed he had been captured by the Vietcong.
 
Suddenly, the boy came out of the jungle and ran across the rice paddies toward the village. He was crying. His mother ran to him and swept him up in her arms. Both of his hands had been cut off, and there was a sign around his neck, a message to his father: if he or anyone else in the village dared go to the polls during the upcoming elections, something worse would happen to the rest of his children.
 
The VC delivered a similar warning to the residents of a hamlet not far from Danang. All were herded before the home of their chief. While they and the chief’s pregnant wife and four children were forced to look on, the chief’s tongue was cut out. Then his genital organs were sliced off and sewn inside his bloody mouth. As he died, the VC went to work on his wife, slashing open her womb. Then, the nine-year-old son: a bamboo lance was rammed through one ear and out the other. Two more of the chief’s children were murdered the same way. The VC did not harm the five-year-old daughter — not physically: they simply left her crying, holding her dead mother’s hand.
 
General Walt tells of his arrival at a district headquarters the day after it had been overrun by VC and North Vietnamese army troops. Those South Vietnamese soldiers not killed in the battle had been tied up and shot through their mouths or the backs of their heads. Then their wives and children, including a number of two- and three-year-olds, had been brought into the street, disrobed, tortured and finally executed: their throats were cut; they were shot, beheaded, disemboweled. The mutilated bodies were draped on fences and hung with signs telling the rest of the community that if they continued to support the Saigon government and allied forces, they could look forward to the same fate.
 
These atrocities are not isolated cases; they are typical. For this is the enemy’s way of warfare, clearly expressed in his combat policy in Vietnam. While the naive and anti-American throughout the world, cued by communist propaganda; have trumpeted against American “immorality” in the Vietnam war — aerial bombing, the use of [[napalm]], casualties caused by American combat action — daily and nightly for years, the communists have systematically authored history’s grisliest catalogue of barbarism. By the end of 1967, they had committed at least 100,000 acts of terror against the South Vietnamese people. The record is an endless litany of tortures, mutilations and murders that would have been instructive even to such as Adolf Hitler.
</blockquote>
 
In 1960, some 1,500 South Vietnamese civilians were killed and 700 abducted. By early 1965, the communists’ Radio Hanoi and Radio Liberation were able to boast that the VC had destroyed 7,559 South Vietnamese hamlets. By the end of 1967, 15,138 South Vietnamese civilians had been killed, 45,929 kidnapped. Few of the kidnapped were ever seen again.<ref>http://www.paulbogdanor.com/left/vietnam/hochiminh.html</ref>
==The War==
In 1958, North Vietnam launched an invasion of Laos.<ref>http://countrystudies.us/laos/24.htm</ref> In 1959, by its own admission, North Vietnam decided on war in South Vietnam.North Vietnam created the Viet Cong and sent 20,000 men to attack the South. In 1961, NorthVietnam used 30,000 troops to build invasion routes via Laos and Cambodia. North Vietnamlater admitted that it “played a decisive role” in bringing to power the Pathet Lao in Laos andthe Khmer Rouge in Cambodia.<ref>The Economist, February 26, 1983; Washington Post, April 23, 1985.</ref> The [[Kennedy]] administration, which had repeatedly intervened to halt right-wing coups, acquiesced in November 1963 to the overthrow of the weak South Vietnam's leader Diem by a coalition of generals. President Nixon would later characterize this decision as a catastrophic betrayal of an ally that contributed to the ultimate disintegration of South Vietnam. The ''casus beli belli'' for full combat intervention by the United States intervention was an alleged attack exaggerated confrontation between North Vietnamese P4 torpedo boats and the USS ''Maddox'' on August 2, 1964 and a US ship second alleged attack by North Vietnamon August 4, 1964 which involved both the USS ''Maddox'' and USS ''Turner Joy''; the events became known as the "[[Gulf of Tonkin Incidentincident]]". The Shortly thereafter, President Johnson got Congress to pass the "[[Gulf of Tonkin Resolution]]". President Johnson then deployed US military forces for warfare against North Vietnam. He had the US responded respond with a massive bombing campaign called "Operation Rolling Thunder". Although a swift victory over North Vietnam would have taken a matter of months, the risk of Chinese intervention was considered too great to accept. Thus, Vietnam was fought to avoid "another Korea".
President Johnson, a tormented but deeply ultimately sincere and good man, could not bear the burden of the war. His incoherent war policy, combined with the lies and deceptions he employed to sell it, resulted in a loss of public faith in his honesty. He began to doubt himself, while his wildly incompetent administration, exemplified by [[Robert McNamara]], began to have doubts about the morality of US policy. Many of them would join the anti-war movement.
Richard Nixon was subsequently elected President on a pledge to end the war by ''prosecuting'' it. His shrewd diplomacy, backed with the immense intellect of his National Security Advisor and Secretary of State, [[Henry Kissinger]], hoped to negotiate an end to the war through a show of force.
By 1968, the KK had 14-15,000 fighters, while the KVM had 12,000. North Vietnam had invaded and occupied large chunks of Cambodia. Nearly half of the country was faced with North Vietnamese or other Communist occupation. The Viet Cong was active in the country with about 30,000 troops, and worked with the KVM to launch invasions of Cambodia from North Vietnam. The North Vietnamese had 60,000 troops on Cambodian soil. This would be the equivalent in the United States of nearly 4 million armed and organized troops from Mexico and Canada overrunning most of the country. These figures are from 10 months prior to the start of any US bombing, which began in late 1968 under President Johnson.
By 1969, the North had accelerated its long-term plan, dubbed "Campaign X," to conquer Cambodia. By 1970, it had the supply lines, troops, and logistical support necessary to force the collapse of Cambodia. Sihanouk had long done little to disguise his support for the North Vietnamese Communists, but now he grew afraid. "Hanoi," he said, "could easily force the collapse of both Cambodia and what is left of Laos if it was not faced with American opposition." Therefore, he encouraged the Americans to bomb KK, KVM, VC, and North Vietnamese "sanctuaries" in Cambodia so as to send Hanoi a message that it had better back down immediately. Demographic evidence indicates that the US bombings of Cambodia, especially the Menu bombings, ultimately killed about 40,000 Cambodian combatants and civilians.<ref>Marek Sliwinski, Le Génocide Khmer Rouge: Une Analyse Démographique (L’Harmattan, 1995), pp41-8.</ref> Some estimates go as high as 60100,000 killedby the bombing.<ref>http://www.yale.edu/cgp/Walrus_CambodiaBombing_OCT06. pdf</ref> Many leftists opposed to the war considered the bombing to be a war crime. The Khmer Rouge claimed that 600-800,000 were killed by died in the US bombingwar, <ref name="paulbogdanor.com">http://www.paulbogdanor.com/200chomskylies.pdf</ref> which is about three times the real figure,<ref>Marek Sliwinski, Le Génocide Khmer Rouge: Une Analyse Démographique</ref> and innumerable [[far-left ]] activists such as [[Noam Chomsky]] have not only embraced these figures, although demographically they are inconceivably high.  In 1970, North Vietnamese troops invaded and attempted to overrun the entire country numbers but also attributed all of Cambodia at the request of deaths to American bombing and thus implied that the KVM, who had surrounded Khmer Rouge ''underestimated'' the capital and hoped one small push would be enough to overthrow full toll from the weak Lon Nol regimewar<ref name="paulbogdanor. Nixon responded forcefully with an incursion and bombing campaign to force com"/>—despite the North Vietnamese outdemographic impossibility of their assertions. Justifying his actions, he stated:
In 1970, North Vietnamese troops invaded and attempted to overrun the entire country of Cambodia at the request of the indigenous Communist forces, who had surrounded the capital and hoped one small push would be enough to overthrow the weak Lon Nol regime. Nixon responded forcefully with an incursion and bombing campaign to force the North Vietnamese out. Justifying his actions, he stated:
<blockquote>
"Cambodia, a small country of 7 million [actually 8 million] people, has been a neutral nation since the Geneva agreement of 1954 - an agreement, incidentally, which was signed by the Government of North Vietnam.
</blockquote><blockquote>
American policy since then has been to scrupulously respect the neutrality of the Cambodian people. We have maintained a skeleton diplomatic mission of fewer than 15 in Cambodia's capital, and that only since last August. For the previous 4 years, from 1965 to 1969, we did not have any diplomatic mission whatever in Cambodia. And for the past 5 years, we have provided no military assistance whatever and no economic assistance to Cambodia.
</blockquote><blockquote>
North Vietnam, however, has not respected that neutrality.
</blockquote><blockquote>
For the past 5 years - as indicated on this map that you see here - North Vietnam has occupied military sanctuaries all along the Cambodian frontier with South Vietnam. Some of these extend up to 20 miles into Cambodia. The sanctuaries are in red and, as you note, they are on both sides of the border. They are used for hit and run attacks on American and South Vietnamese forces in South Vietnam.
</blockquote><blockquote>
These Communist occupied territories contain major base camps, training sites, logistics facilities, weapons and ammunition factories, airstrips, and prisoner-of-war compounds.
</blockquote><blockquote>
For 5 years, neither the United States nor South Vietnam has moved against these enemy sanctuaries because we did not wish to violate the territory of a neutral nation. Even after the Vietnamese Communists began to expand these sanctuaries 4 weeks ago, we counseled patience to our South Vietnamese allies and imposed restraints on our own commanders.
</blockquote><blockquote>
In contrast to our policy, the enemy in the past 2 weeks has stepped up his guerrilla actions and he is concentrating his main forces in these sanctuaries that you see on this map where they are building up to launch massive attacks on our forces and those of South Vietnam.
</blockquote><blockquote>
North Vietnam in the last 2 weeks has stripped away all pretense of respecting the sovereignty or the neutrality of Cambodia. Thousands of their soldiers are invading the country from the sanctuaries; they are encircling the capital of Phnom Penh. Coming from these sanctuaries, as you see here, they have moved into Cambodia and are encircling the capital."<ref>http://www.mekong.net/cambodia/nixon430.htm</ref>
</blockquote>
Although North Vietnam would invade and annex South Vietnam and invade, occupy, force the collapse of and establish total political control over Laos; it would ultimately fail to meet this objective in Cambodia. Though it supported, or rather offered support to, the KK; its goal of directly establishing political control over Cambodia would not be reached until 1979. Some commentators, like William Shawcross, have controversially argued that the US bombing, by forcing out the North Vietnamese, helped to create the conditions that allowed Pol Pot to come to power. Shawcross and others have also claimed that the US bombing was the main propaganda tool used to recruit members for the KK, and that it helped radicalize the Cambodian populace and swell the ranks of the Communists.
 
Documents uncovered from the Soviet archives after 1991 reveal that the North Vietnamese invasion of Cambodia in 1970 was launched at the explicit request of the Khmer Rouge and negotiated by Pol Pot's then second in command, Nuon Chea.<ref>Dmitry Mosyakov, “The Khmer Rouge and the Vietnamese Communists: A History of Their Relations as Told in the Soviet Archives,” in Susan E. Cook, ed., Genocide in Cambodia and Rwanda (Yale Genocide Studies Program Monograph Series No. 1, 2004), p54ff. Availible online at: http://128.36.236.77/workpaper/pdfs/GS20.pdf "In April–May 1970, many North Vietnamese forces entered Cambodia in response to the call for help addressed to Vietnam not by Pol Pot, but by his deputy Nuon Chea. Nguyen Co Thach recalls: “Nuon Chea has asked for help and we have liberated five provinces of Cambodia in ten days.”"</ref>
When Nixon came into office, there were more than 500,000 U.S. troops in Vietnam, and their number was increasing. Hanoi insisted that to obtain a cease-fire, the U.S. had to meet two preconditions: First, the U.S. had to overthrow the South Vietnamese government, disband its police and army and replace it with a communist-dominated government. Second, it had to establish an unconditional timetable for the withdrawal of its forces, to be carried out regardless of subsequent negotiations or how long they might last. The presence of North Vietnamese troops in Laos and Cambodia was declared not an appropriate subject for negotiations. Between 1969 and 1972, he withdrew 515,000 American troops, ended American ground combat in 1971 and reduced American casualties by nearly 90%. According to Kissinger, "a breakthrough occurred in 1972 because the administration's strategic design finally came together in its retaliation for the North Vietnamese spring offensive. When the U.S. mined North Vietnam's harbors, Hanoi found itself isolated because, as a result of the opening to China in 1971 and the summit in 1972, Beijing and the Soviet Union stood aside. Hanoi's offensive was defeated on the ground entirely by South Vietnamese forces assisted by U.S. air power. Faced with a military setback and diplomatic isolation, Le Duc Tho, Hanoi's principal negotiator, abandoned Hanoi's 1969 terms in October 1972. He accepted conditions publicly put forward by Nixon in January 1972 -- and decried as unachievable in the U.S. domestic debate. The terms of the resulting Paris peace agreement were an unconditional cease-fire and release of prisoners; continuation of the existing South Vietnamese government; continued U.S. economic and military help for it; no further infiltration of North Vietnamese forces; withdrawal of the remaining U.S. forces; and withdrawal of North Vietnamese forces from Laos and Cambodia."<ref>http://articles.latimes.com/2007/may/31/opinion/oe-kissinger31/2</ref>
Nixon brought about the first peace agreements between [[Israel]] and [[Egypt]], and dramatically lessened the scale of the bloodshed in Indochina. For a time, it seemed peace might be within our reach. Nixon was re-elected by a landslide in 1972.
Meanwhile, in 1973, the Khmer Krahom fell under the control of its most fanatical members, led by Pol Pot and Ieng Sary. They were beyond the control of Hanoi and sought to completely annihilate Cambodian society and restart from scratch. When they besieged the capital again in 1973, Nixon bombed 20,000 of them to their graves, saving Cambodia from the US again launched a bombing raid against Communist takeoverforces. However, The US Seventh Air Force argued that the overthrow of Sihanouk and bombing prevented the violent madness fall of Phnom Penh in 1973 by killing 16,000 of the 25,500 Khmer Rouge left the country in chaos, and fighters besieging the situation remained delicatecity.
The communist leaders had expected that the ceasefire terms would favor their side. But Saigon, bolstered by a surge of U.S. aid received just before the ceasefire went into effect, began to roll back the Vietcong. The communists responded with a new strategy hammered out in a series of meetings in Hanoi in March 1973, according to the memoirs of [[Tran Van Tra]].
As the Vietcong's top commander, Trà participated in several of these meetings. With U.S. bombings suspended, work on the Ho Chi Minh Trail and other logistical structures could proceed unimpeded. Logistics would be upgraded until the North was in a position to launch a massive invasion of the South, projected for the 1975–1976 dry season. Trà calculated that this date would be Hanoi's last opportunity to strike before Saigon's army could be fully trained.
In 1974, Congress voted not to enforce the commitments agreed to in the Paris Peace Accords. Air support for Cambodia, South Vietnam, and Laos was cut off. The military aid promised was scaled back or never materialized, and the North was allowed to resume support for the Khmer Rouge. "After Nixon stepped down over Watergate," said one Communist commander, "we knew we would win."<refname="grunt.com">http://www.grunt.com/scuttlebutt/corps-stories/vietnam/north.asp</ref> Without the logistical support provided by the Ho Chi Minh trail, the North would not have been able to launch an invasion of South Vietnam by 1975, which it predicted would be its "last chance" before the South was self-sufficiently able to defend itself.<ref>http://www.name="grunt.com"/scuttlebutt/corps-stories/vietnam/north.asp</ref> The US canceled the bombing of Communist positions on the trail. In Cambodia, last minute efforts on the part of the US to arrange for a peace settlement involving Sihanouk ended in failure. When the US Congress vetoed [[Ford]]'s call for a resumption of air support in Cambodia, panic and a sense of doom filled the capital, which was mercilessly shelled for weeks more than a year by the Communists. President Ford openly predicted a "bloodbath" and stated that the Congress's decision to abandon Cambodia to the Khmer Rouge, in particular, would lead to "an unbelievable horror story".<ref>http://www.paulbogdanor.com/left/cambodia/bloodbath1.pdf</ref> The US frantically abandoned Saigon, and the Pathet Lao advanced throughout Laos.
==Aftermath==
An estimated 180,000<ref>http://www.mega.nu/ampp/rummel/dbg.tab11.2.gif, counting the 30,000 Vietnamese killed during the "cease-fire" period</ref> Indochinese died in the renewed Communist offensive to conquer South Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia after the American withdrawal. Professor R.J. Rummel calculates that Communist Vietnam directly killed 1.7 million people from 1954 1945 to 1987 in democide alone (not counting war casualties or the "boat people").,<ref>http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/SOD.CHAP6.HTM</ref> from a total range of 700,000 to 3.7 million murdered.<ref>http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/COM.TAB1.GIF</ref> Some 400,000 to 2.5 million of these were killed after 1975. These figures include Laotians and Cambodians killed by Hanoi.
Phnom Penh, the capital of Cambodia, fell to followers of the Communist Party of Kampuchea, commonly known as the [[Khmer Rouge]], on April 17, 1975. Over the next four years, the Khmer Rouge enacted a genocidal policy that would kill over one-fourth of all Cambodians, or more than 2 million people. Investigators have uncovered and examined the remains of 1UN investigation reported 2–3 million dead,386,734 Cambodians found in mass graves near Khmer Rouge execution centers whose cause of death has while UNICEF estimated 3 million had been determined to have been primarily execution by the former Khmer Rouge regimekilled. <ref>httpWilliam Shawcross, ''The Quality of Mercy://wwwCambodia, Holocaust, and Modern Conscience'' (Touchstone, 1985), p115-6.mekong.net/cambodia/deaths.htm</ref> Because only about one-half to a third of those who died during the Khmer Rouge years Demographic analysis by Patrick Heuveline suggests that between 1.17 and 3.42 million Cambodians were executed (the rest having died from other causes like state-created faminekilled, the deliberate withholding of basic necessities by the state<ref name="Heuveline, the refusal by the state to allow foreign aidPatrick 2001">Heuveline, the abolishing Patrick (2001). "The Demographic Analysis of medicine Mortality in Cambodia." In Forced Migration and hospitals by the stateMortality, systematic overwork eds. Holly E. Reed and slave labor by the stateCharles B. Keely. Washington, brutal mistreatment by the stateD.C.: National Academy Press.</ref> while Marek Sliwinski estimates that 1.8 million is a conservative figure.<ref name="Marek Sliwinski 1995">Marek Sliwinski, and normal mortality)''Le Génocide Khmer Rouge: Une Analyse Démographique'' (L'Harmattan, 1995).</ref> Researcher Craig Etcheson of the Documentation Center of Cambodia estimates suggests that the former regime killed or otherwise caused the unnecessary deaths of, death toll was between 2.0 and 2.5 million Cambodians, with a "most likely estimate " figure of 2.2 million. After 5 years of researching grave sites, he concluded that "these mass graves contain the remains of 1,386,734 victims of execution".<refname="Mekong.net_deaths">{{cite web|last=Sharp|first=Bruce|title=Counting Hell: The Death Toll of the Khmer Rouge Regime in Cambodia|date = April 1, 2005|url = http://www.mekong.net/cambodia/deaths.htm</ref> This is because 2.5 to 3 million Cambodians died from 75-79|accessdate =January 9, and 500,000 deaths over this time would have represented normal mortality. A UN investigation reported 2-3 million dead, while UNICEF estimated 3 million had been killed.<ref>William Shawcross, The Quality of Mercy: Cambodia, Holocaust, and Modern Conscience (Touchstone, 1985), p115-62013}}</ref> Even the Khmer Rouge acknowledged that 2 million had been killed—though they attributed those deaths to a subsequent Vietnamese invasion.<ref>Khieu Samphan, Interview, Time, March 10, 1980</ref> By late 1979, UN and Red Cross officials were warning that another 2.25 million Cambodians faced death by starvation due to “the "the near destruction of Cambodian society under the regime of ousted Prime Minister Pol Pot,"<ref>New York Times, August 8, 1979.</ref><refname="time.com">http://www.time.com/time/magazine/printout/0,8816,912511947511,00.html</ref> who were saved by American and international aid. After repeated border clashes in 1978, Vietnam invaded Cambodia and ousted the Khmer Rouge. Another 100-200,000 Cambodians were killed by the brutal dictatorship imposed on Cambodia by Communist Vietnam. Cambodia's civil war from 1978-1994 killed an estimated 200,000 individuals.<ref>http://userswww.erolstime.com/mwhite28time/warstat3.htm#Cambodian<magazine/ref> As estimated by the CIAprintout/0, the deliberate continuation of the great 1979 famine ''after'' the fall of the Khmer Rouge by the invading Vietnamese led to the deaths of an additional 7008816,0000 Cambodians from January 1979 until 1980912511,00.<ref>http://www.mekong.net/cambodia/demcat.htmhtml</ref> The CIA estimated that the civil war reduced the expected 1979 population to slightly over 8 million, that the Khmer Rouge reduced the actual 1979 population to between 6 and 6.5 million, and that who were saved by 1980 the population had fallen to roughly 5 American and a half million at the hands of the Vietnameseinternational aid.<ref>http://www.mekong.net/cambodia/demcat.htm</ref> The CIA concluded that these tragic events "may ultimately spell the demise of the Khmer as a people."
In responseThe Vietnamese Communists, China invaded led by Le Duan, perpetrated a huge bloodbath in South Vietnam , murdering hundreds of thousands of South Vietnamese men, women, and children in 1979cold blood. Up to 155,000 refugees fleeing the final NVA [[1975 Spring Offensive|Spring Offensive]] were killed or abducted on the road to [[Tuy Hoa]] in 1975.<ref>Wiesner, Louis, ''Victims and Survivors: Displaced Persons and Other War Victims in Viet-Nam, 1954-1975'' (Greenwood Press, 1988), pp. 318-9.</ref> Sources have estimated that 165,000 South Vietnamese died in the re-education camps out of 2.5 million sent,<ref name="Desbarats">Desbarats, Jacqueline. [http://jim.com/repression.htm "Repression in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Executions and Population Relocation"], from ''The Vietnam Debate'' (1990) by John Morton Moore. "We know now from a 1985 statement by Nguyen Co Tach that two countries fought and a brief border warhalf million, known as rather than one million, people went through reeducation....in fact, possibly more than 100,000 Vietnamese people were victims of extrajudicial executions in the Third Indochina Warlast ten years....it is likely that, which cost over overall, at least one million Vietnamese were the victims of forced population transfers."</ref><ref>Anh Do and Hieu Tran Phan, [http://dartcenter.org/content/camp-z30-d-survivors Camp Z30-D: The Survivors], ''Orange County Register'', April 29, 2001.</ref> while the number executed could have been as high as 200,000 casualties<ref>Al Santoli, including 30ed., ''To Bear Any Burden'' (Indiana University Press, 1999), pp272, 292-3.</ref> (Jacqueline Desbarats estimates an absolute minimum of 100,000 or more deathsexecutions<ref name="Desbarats"/><ref>Morris, Stephen J. According to figures from [http://www.paulbogdanor.com/left/vietnam/morris.pdf Glastnost and the UN Commission of RefugeesGulag: The Numbers Game], mass expulsions by Communist ''Vietnam led to Commentary'', May–June 1988.</ref>). Victims were beheaded, eviscerated or buried alive.<ref>Jacqueline Desbarats and Karl D. Jackson, "Research Among Vietnamese Refugees Reveals a Bloodbath," Wall Street Journal, April 22, 1985.</ref> Rummel estimates that slave labor in the "New Economic Zones" caused 50,000 deaths by drowning (out of 200-400a total 1 million deported).<ref name="Desbarats"/><ref name="Statistics of Vietnamese Democide">Rummel,000 South Rudolph, [http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/SOD.CHAP6.HTM Statistics of Vietnamese “boat Democide], in his ''Statistics of Democide''.</ref> The number of [[boat people]] who died is estimated between 200,” while more than 500-600000 and 400,000 South Vietnamese were killed after , out of the Communist take-over2.5 million that fled (according to the UN).<ref>Associated Press, June 23, 1979, ; San Diego Union, July 20, 1986. See generally Nghia M. Vo(2006), ''The Bamboo Gulag (McFarlandVietnamese Boat People, 2004)1954 and 1975-1992'', McFarland.</ref> Indeed, nearly 100,000 South Vietnamese There were killed within the first 90 days also tens of thousands of suicides after the Communist takeoverNorth Vietnamese take-over.<ref>httpLe Thi Anh, "The New Vietnam", ''[[National Review]]'', April 29, 1977, estimated some 20,000 post-war mass suicides.</ref> In 1988, Vietnam suffered a famine that afflicted millions.<ref>Crossette, Barbara, [https://www.vietnamnytimes.ttu.educom/events1988/1996_Symposium05/96papers15/storyworld/hanoi-citing-famine-fears-seeks-emergency-aid.html?src=pm Hanoi, Citing Famine Fears, Seeks Emergency Aid], ''[[The New York Times]],'' May 15, 1988.htm</ref>
The Pathet Lao overthrew the Royalist Government of Laos in December 1975. They established a Communist dictatorship known as the Lao People’s People's Democratic Republic. The Pathet Lao waged a campaign of genocide, exterminating an estimated over 100,000 Hmong tribespeople. They inflicted massacres, terror bombing, concentration camps, and mass rape.<ref>Forced Back and Forgotten (Lawyers’ Committee for Human Rights, 1989); and Jane Hamilton-Merrit, ''Tragic Mountains: The Hmong, the Americans, and the Secret Wars for Laos'' (Indiana University Press, 1999)</ref> The Communists killed over 184,000 people in Laos altogether.<ref>http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat5.htm#Lao75</ref>
More than 3 million people fled Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos as “boat people,” about half of whom have been resettled by the United States.
RAfter repeated border clashes in 1978, Vietnam invaded Cambodia and ousted the Khmer Rouge, installing a puppet government headed by Khmer Rouge defector Heng Samrin.J From January until July 1979, according to [[CIA]] estimates, around 350,000 people were killed, primarily by Vietnam's refusal to allow foreign aid for a time. Rummel In addition, an analyst a comparable number of political killingspeople fled Cambodia for [[Thailand]].<ref>http://www.mekong.net/cambodia/demcat.htm</ref> The toll from the entire famine over the years 1979-81 is estimated at about 500,000 dead (according to Etcheson).<ref name="hawaii.edu">http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/SOD.TAB4.1A.GIF</ref> Some 25-50,000 Vietnamese died in combat,<ref name="users.erols.com">http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat3.htm</ref> while perhaps 100, eloquently summarized life under 000 Cambodian combatants and civilians died in the war itself.<ref name="hawaii.edu"/><ref name="users.erols.com"/> Tens of thousands more were killed by the Khmer Rouge as follows, which controlled parts of the country late into 1979 and waged a guerilla war against the Vietnamese-backed government.<ref name="hawaii.edu"/> The total number of people killed by the Samrin regime in democide has never been clearly documented. Rummel estimates 230,000;<ref name="hawaii.edu"/> but this is mere guesswork. As noted, scores of thousands more were killed in the civil war that followed the invasion and by Khmer Rouge guerillas. Rummel believes that the full toll from this period could be in excess of one million.<ref>http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/SOD.CHAP4.HTM</ref> This claim may be an exaggeration, but as is common in post-genocide societies, the population growth rate for Cambodia in the eighties was exceptionally high—which could have masked the full extent of the democide.
<blockquote>The United States had supported and supplied the Cambodian military government of General Lon Nol. But the American Congress ended all aid In response to him with the withdrawal of the United States from the Soviet-backed Vietnamese invasion, China invaded Vietnam War in 1973. After successive retreats, Lon Nol could no longer even defend the capital, Phnom Penh, against the Khmer Rouge guerrillas1979. The Cambodian army then declared two countries fought a cease-fire and laid down its arms. On April 17brief border war, 1975known as the Third Indochina War, a rag-tag bunch of solemn, black-pajama-clad teenagers with red scarves and Mao caps, carrying arms of all descriptions, walked or were trucked from different directions into Phnom Penh. They were part of an army of 68which cost over 200,000 Khmer Rouge guerrillas that had achieved victory for a Communist Party of only 14casualties,000 members against an army of about 200including some 30,000 men. At first, the people hardly knew what to make of these victorious guerrillas. After all, the war was over, the killing had stopped, and people who had chafed under the Lon Nol government were relieved and happy. Many intellectuals and middle-class Cambodians were disgusted with the everyday corruption of the government, and were willing to try anything that brought change, even Communism. The Khmer Rouge was cheered, and there were public and private celebrationsdeaths.
But before the people could settle down and enjoy a few days of peace, the Khmer Rouge began doing the unimaginable: they turned their weapons on the 2,000,000 to 3,000,000 inhabitants of the capital and with angry yelling, shouting, hand-waving, threats of immediate death, and actual shooting, demanded that everyone get out of the city. In this and all other newly occupied cities and towns1981, their order to evacuate was implacable. Including those in other cities and towns elsewhere, the Khmer Forge kicked into a largely unprepared countryside near 4,240,000 urban Cambodians and refugees, even the sick, infirm and aged. Even Pol Pot made his famous declaration denying guilt for those on the operating table or in labor with child, brutalities committed by the order was absoluteorganization he led: "Go! Go! You must leave!"
<blockquote>
Pol Pot said that he knows that many people in the country hate him and think he’s responsible for the killings. He said that he knows many people died. When he said this he nearly broke down and cried. He said he must accept responsibility because the line was too far to the left, and because he didn’t keep proper track of what was going on. He said he was like the master in a house he didn’t know what the kids were up to, and that he trusted people too much. For example, he allowed [one person] to take care of central committee business for him, [another person] to take care of intellectuals, and [a third person] to take care of political education.... These were the people to whom he felt very close, and he trusted them completely. Then in the end ... they made a mess of everything.... They would tell him things that were not true, that everything was fine, that this person or that was a traitor. In the end they were the real traitors. The major problem had been cadres formed by the Vietnamese.
</blockquote>
Families evacuated any way possible, carrying what few possessions they could grab. The wealthy or middle-class rode Communist Vietnam's refusal to allow international food aid into Cambodia after 1979 so as to starve out in cars, soon to be abandoned, or stolen from them by whatever remained of the Khmer Rouge. Some left on heavily loaded motor scooters or bicycles, which would also soon be confiscated. The vast multitude of pathetic urbanites and refugees only had their feet, and formed barely moving lines extending for miles. Some ill or infirm hobbled along; some thrown from hospitals crawled along on hands and knees. According resistance nearly led to a British journalist who, from the safety of the French embassy, watched the slowly moving mass death of evacuees, the Khmer Rouge was "tipping out patients [millions of people from the hospitals] like garbage into the streets.... Bandaged men starvation and women hobbled by the embassydisease. Wives pushed wounded soldier husbands on hospital beds on wheels, some with serum drips still attached. In five years of war, this is the greatest caravan of human misery I have ever seen<ref name="time.com" />
Vietnam fought three more wars after 1975 and armed Communist insurgencies with billions of dollars in an attempt to overrun [[Thailand]] and [[Malaysia]]. In South Vietnam, a nightmarish police state was established based on the Stalinist model: Political parties were outlawed; all music, books, literature, movies, and other media published prior to 1975 were banned completely; rationing, malnutrition, and famine ensued; ongoing class discrimination, xenophobic ethnic cleansing, and religious persecution continue to this day.<ref>http://www.paulbogdanor.com/left/vietnam/toai.pdf</ref><ref>http://www.paulbogdanor.com/left/vietnam/hoan.html</ref><ref>http://www.paulbogdanor.com/left/vietnam/morris.pdf</ref><ref>http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~sdenney/Vietnam-Reeducation-Camps-1982</ref><ref>http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~sdenney/SRV-Discrimination-1990</ref>
Failure to evacuate meant death. Failure to begin evacuation promptly enough meant death. Failure of anyone in The US and other Western countries covertly armed the mass non-Communist forces of humanity that clogged the roads out of a city Son Sann and Prince Sihanouk in an attempt to force out the neighboring countryside to obey Khmer Rouge orders meant deathVietnamese troops occupying Cambodia. Failure to give These brave guerillas also engaged in extensive fighting with the Khmer Rouge what they wanted--whether car.<ref>Far Eastern Economic Review, motor scooterDecember 22, bicycle, watch, or whatever--meant death. 1988</ref> (See [[Reagan Doctrine]])
Far from bringing peace, American defeat vastly increased the scale of the bloodshed in Indochina, as 3-4 million people were slaughtered in a bloodbath far surpassing the expectations of even the most fervent supporters of the war. Although North Vietnam agreed to "peace" in 1973; no one protested its subsequent invasion of South Vietnam, let alone Vietnam's wars with China, Laos, and Cambodia. The campuses were silent on the Holocaust in Cambodia, despite their hysterical response to the limited US incursion in 1970. The bloodbath received little media coverage at the time.
The direction Evidence exists that the people exited the city depended on the side they were on United States left behind POWs in Vietnam when they received the evacuation order. The Khmer Rouge told refugees to return to their home village; but for the mass and particularly the urbanitesit withdrew, where they went after evacuation and what village even though the Khmer Rouge eventually settled them in depended on the whim of the soldiers and cadre along the waygovernment denied such claims. People were jumbled together<ref>Kirkwood, trudging along for days or weeks, usually with whatever clothes, covering, and provisions they could snatch at the last momentR. Many had minimal suppliesCort (September 1, since they had believed the Khmer Rouge who, to minimize disorder, told them that the evacuation would only be for a few days2018). [https://www.thenewamerican. com/print-magazine/item/29825-evidence-of-pows-from-vietnam Evidence of POWs From Vietnam]. ''The very young and oldNew American''. Retrieved September 1, and those already sick2018.<br>See also:*Kirkwood, injuredR. Cort (August 26, or infirm soon died 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/29882-mccain-was-no-maverick-on the roads or trails-pows McCain Was No Maverick on POWs]. One of these trudging millions''The New American''. Retrieved August 26, a medical doctor named Vann Hay, said that every 200 meters he saw a dead child2018.</ref>
Including those killed outright, ===Failure of US campaign to help the toll from this outrageous and bloody evacuation is in dispute. Whether 40South===Military,000 to 80political,000 evacuees were murdered or died, as one scholar sympathetic to and social historians have ever after debated why the Khmer Rouge claimed, or 280,000 United States was unable to 400,000 as defeat the CIA estimated, the sheer horror of this urban expulsion is undeniableNorth Vietnamese.
James Q. Wilson wrote: "First, Presidents Kennedy and Johnson both wanted to avoid losing Vietnam without waging a major war in Asia." <ref>When Richard Nixon became president, he wanted to end the war by pulling out American troops, and he did so. None of the three presidents wanted to win, but all wanted to report "progress." All three administrations instructed military commanders always to report gains and rely on suspect body counts as a way of measuring progress. [http://www.opinionjournal.com/federation/feature/?id=110009203]</ref>
Primarily, this Another factor was done as a matter careerism of ideologythe officer corps. The Khmer Rouge saw number of officers in the city as US army grew disproportionately from the home end of foreign ideasWorld War II, capitalists, and their supportive bourgeoisie intellectuals; and as thoroughly corrupt and requiring with a thorough cleansing. And those the Khmer Rouge believed the city had corrupted, its professionals, business people, public officials, teachers, writers, and workers, must either be eliminated or reeducated and purified. And 1-in-15 ratio dropping to the Khmer Rouge, the best way of remaking those "corrupted minds" that they allowed to survive was to make them work 1 in the fields along side pure peasants6. Consider the slogans broadcast over Radio Phnom Penh and given at meetings at the time: "what is infected must be cut out.... What is rotten must be removed.... What is too long must be shortened and made the right length.... It isn't enough to cut down Competition for promotions was handled badly by General Westmoreland, who permitted a bad plant, it must be uprootedsix-month tour of duty for officers." This inhuman expulsion was an opening salvo in hardly enough time to learn how to engage the Khmer Rouge campaign to utterly remake Cambodian culture and societyenemy successfully, and gave rise to construct pure Communism forthwith. Pol Pot and a few henchmen, who organized and loosely commanded resentment among the Khmer Rouge, planned all thislargely working-class enlisted men.{{fact}}
America at first operated on the assumption that victory by body count was possible and would eventually bring the North Vietnamese to the peace table. There were in fact peace negotiations following Operation Linebacker II in December 1972, but these succeeded mostly in giving the United States its prisoners back and time to withdraw from the fight. It was simply impossible for the North Vietnamese leadership, which had been fighting in some form for 30 years, to imagine the indefinite existence of South Vietnam apart from unification under their rule.
They collectivized peasants everywhere--95 to 97 percent ==Cost of the population eventually forced into collective farmsWar==195,000--and expected evacuees and peasants to work solely for 430,000 South Vietnamese civilians died in the communist revolutionwar. They forbid all political<ref name="Lewy">Lewy, civilGuenter (1978). ''America in Vietnam''. New York: Oxford University Press. Appendix 1, or human rightspp. They prohibited travel without a pass from village to village450-453</ref><ref>Thayer, Thomas C (1985). They forced Cambodians to eat and sleep ''War Without Fronts: The American Experience in communesVietnam''. Boulder: Westview Press. Ch. 12.</ref> 50, and ordered even young children to work 000-65,000 North Vietnamese civilians died in the fieldswar. In some regions<ref name="Lewy"/><ref>Wiesner, they made peasants work from about 6Louis A. (1988). ''Victims and Survivors Displaced Persons and Other War Victims in Viet-Nam''. New York:00 aGreenwood Press.mp. to 8310</ref> The Army of the Republic of Vietnam lost between 171,331 and 220,357 men during the war.<ref name="Lewy"/><ref>Thayer, Thomas C (1985). ''War Without Fronts:00 or 10The American Experience in Vietnam''. Boulder:00 Westview Press. p.m106.</ref> The official US Department of Defense figure was 950, with time off only for "political education765 communist forces killed in Vietnam from 1965 to 1974.Defense Department officials believed that these body count figures need to be deflated by 30 percent. In addition, Guenter Lewy assumes that one-third of the reported " They closed permanently all primaryenemy" killed may have been civilians, secondaryconcluding that the actual number of deaths of communist military forces was probably closer to 444, and technical schools000.<ref name="Lewy"/> During the peak war years, as well as colleges and universitiesalmost a third of civilian deaths were the result of Viet Cong atrocities. They shut down all hospitals and automatically murdered Western<ref>Guenter Lewy, America in Vietnam (Oxford University Press, 1978), pp272-trained medical doctors3, 448-9. They prohibited sex between the unmarried</ref> Between 200, 000 and 300,000 Cambodians died in some placesthe war,<ref name="Heuveline, Patrick 2001"/><ref>Marek Sliwinski, Le Génocide Khmer Rouge: Une Analyse Démographique (L’Harmattan, 1995)</ref><ref>Banister, Judith, they threatened boys and girls with death for as little as holding handsPaige Johnson (1993). Also at risk "After the Nightmare: The Population of death, unauthorized contact was forbidden even between those marriedCambodia. " In Genocide and Democracy in Cambodia: The Khmer Rouge allowed no appeals, no courts, no judges, no trials, the United Nations and no lawthe International Community, ed. They eliminated all moneyBen Kiernan. New Haven, businesses, books, and newspapersConn. They banned music: Yale University Southeast Asia Studies. They eliminated practicing lawyers</ref> as well as 20, doctors000 Laotians.<ref>Small, teachers, engineers, scientistsMelvin & Joel David Singer, ''Resort to Arms: International and all other professionals, because whatever truths these professions contained, the peasant could pick up through experienceCivil Wars 1816–1980''.</ref>
Over the course of the war, the United States suffered 46,226 battle deaths with 153,311 wounded 5,486 missing and 10,326 non-battle deaths. 3.3 million troops fought over the course of the war, with the largest number of 625,866 reached on March 27, 1969. The North Vietnamese claimed to have lost 1 million men.<ref>Encyclopedia of Military History, Dupuy & Dupuy, 1979, Chart Page 1221</ref> Such a casualty rate, if applied to the United States, would have meant 13 million Americans killed and 3.9 million missing in action.<ref>Who Lost Vietnam?, by Joseph L. Galloway, a senior writer for U.S. News & World Report</ref>
This is all incredible {{cquote|'''They were quite a group, the boys of Vietnam -- boys who fought a terrible and some details on this may help its digestionvicious war without enough support from home, boys who were dodging bullets while we debated the efficacy of the battle. Just consider how It was often our poor who fought in that war; it was the Khmer Rouge controlled personal relationsunpampered boys of the working class who picked up the rifles and went on the march. They made showing love learned not to a relative or laughing with them dangerous, since rely on us; they might perceive this as showing less dedication learned to, or poking fun at, the Great Revolutionrely on each other. It was even dangerous And they were special in another way: They chose to use some term be faithful. They chose to reject the fashionable skepticism of endearment, such as "honey," "sweetheart," or "dearest," for a loved onetheir time. The doctor Haing Ngor tried They chose to so refer to his wife, for example, and a spy overheard believe and reported him for this, as well as answer the fact that he call of duty. They had eaten food he picked in the forestwild, instead wild courage of bringing it into youth. They seized certainty from the village heart of an ambivalent age; they stood for communal eatingsomething. The local head cadre interrogated him about these sins, and told him, "The chhlop [informers] say that you call your wife 'sweet.' We have no 'sweethearts' here. That is forbidden." Soldiers then took him to a prison where cadre severally tortured him, cut off his finger, and sliced his ankle with a hatchet. He barely survived.
'''And we owe them something, those boys. We owe them first a promise: That just as they did not forget their missing comrades, neither, ever, will we. And there are other promises. We must always remember that peace is a fragile thing that needs constant vigilance. We owe them a promise to look at the world with a steady gaze and, perhaps, a resigned toughness, knowing that we have adversaries in the world and challenges and the only way to meet them and maintain the peace is by staying strong. <small>---[[President Ronald Reagan]], 1986</small>'''}}
This deadly communist revolution created pitiful human dilemmas. Think about what this same doctor Haing Ngor went through when his wife suffered life-threatening complications during childbirth. To help her deliver her baby would mean The death, since the Khmer Rouge forbid husbands toll from delivering their wive's babies. In any case, to use his medical skills to save her would in effect tell the cadre US defeat far surpassed that he was a doctor, and would result in his death, and possibly that of his wife and newborn child. To do nothing might mean their death anyway; still, if he did nothing, exacted by the wife might pull through. He chose to do nothing, and perhaps he could do nothing anyway since he had no proper medical instruments. Mother and baby soon both died, then, leaving a gaping wound in his heart that never healedwar itself.
==Controversies about the War==
But even if Ngor's child had been bornMax Boot wrote:<blockquote>Numerous bits of conventional wisdom have accreted around the Vietnam War. It is commonly held that [[Ho Chi Minh]] was a Vietnamese nationalist above all, he could not have kept it for longa true [[communist]], and that his victory was inevitable. The Khmer Rouge took children away from their parents That [[Ngo Dinh Diem]] was an unpopular and made them live and work repressive [[reactionary]]. That the United States had no vital strategic interest in labor brigadesdefending South Vietnam. If That the children died of fatigue or disease, ‘[[domino theory]]’ was a myth. That the cadre were good enough U.S. was right not to inform their parents; then, what emotion the parents showed could mean their life invade North Vietnam or deathLaos for fear of triggering Chinese intervention. If they wept or displayed extreme unhappiness[[Mark Moyar]], this showed a bourgeois sentimentality--after allyoung, bold, their children had sacrificed themselves for the Great Revolution and the parents should be proud, not unhappy. Similarlyiconoclastic historian, takes a wife expressing grief over an executed husband--an enemy sledge hammer to these hoary beliefs. [His book] is ‘revisionist’ in the best sense of the Great Revolution--was explicitly criticizing the Khmer Rougeword. This unforgivable act of bourgeois sentimentality could mean her death” [https://web.archive.org/web/20061125071028/http://www.triumphforsaken. com/]</blockquote>
Jeffrey Record contends that the military was relegated, as a result of its constitutional position, to the role of an accomplice in what Record states was the ''most strategically reckless American enterprise of the 20th century.'' He charges President Lyndon B. Johnson and Defense Secretary Robert S. McNamara with harshly suppressing their military advisers, with Johnson believing that his hawkish Joint Chiefs of Staff were out to destroy his Great Society by their wild-eyed schemes.<ref>The wrong war. Why We Lost in Vietnam, by Jeffrey Record.</ref>
Throughout Cambodia, fear was a normal condition Many politically correct "history books" make the My Lai Massacre into an important event of lifethe war. The Khmer Rouge systematically massacred people because In March 1968 in the hamlet of past positions[[My Lai]], associations, or relativesapproximately 400 civilians were killed by American troops under the command of 2nd Lt. When William Calley. Many troops present that day protested and did not take part in the cadre discovered someone who had been a top military man under a previous governmentevent. After the event, a former government official or bureaucrat, a business executive or high monk, they and their whole families, including babies, were murdered, sometimes after extended torturethe U.S. This root-Army conducted an investigation and-branch extermination of concluded there had been poor training in the tainted even reached down to cousins Laws and Rules of cousins of former soldiers. For instanceEngagement, Khmer Rouge cadre came poor discipline and poor leadership up to believe that the villagers of Kauk Lon really were former Lon Nol officers, customs officials and police agentsbrigade commander. Troops then forced Atrocities on some level occur in every villager--about 360 menwar. Since the 19th century, women, and children--to march into a nearby forestthe U. As they walked among S. is one of the trees, waiting few nations who prosecute its soldiers ambushed for such acts when they happen. The enemy in Viet Nam "conveniently" overlooked their far more numerous acts of atrocities and machine-gunned them all downused this event for propaganda. Similar slaughter often awaited those who had had any relations with <ref>Dunnigan & Nofi, ''Dirty Little Secrets of the West or Vietnam, even sometimes War'' (1999)</ref> This does not justify the Soviet Unionmassacre, or who had ever opposed but 3 to 5,000 civilians were killed and found in mass graves after the Khmer Rouge. The Khmer Rouge even might execute those found with Western propertyretaking of Hue following the [[Tet Offensive]], such as books, or those who spoke French or English--even those who had been schooled beyond the seventh gradea point not often noted. Even Other atrocities are listed in some areas wearing glasses was a capital offenseother sections of this article.
Largely because of misreporting during the war (see Media Bias below) as well as the [[anti-war]] movement, various returning veterans in Vietnam were treated horribly by the anti-war crowd, where they often were spat upon and denounced as "baby killers.<ref>https://americanhistory2013vietnamwar.weebly.com/treatment-of-returning-troops.html</ref> Ironically, as [[Leftists]], many of the anti-war protestors tended to support [[abortion]].
Not only did the Khmer Rouge run amok massacring their people, but also everywhere the Khmer Rouge tried to destroy the very heart of peasant life. Hinayana Buddhism had been a state religion, and the priesthood of monks with their saffron robes was a central part of Cambodian culture. Some 90 percent of Cambodians believed in some form of Buddhism. Many received a rudimentary schooling from the monks, and many young people became monks for part of their lives. The Khmer Rouge could not allow so powerful an institution to stand and therefore set out with vigor to destroy it. They exterminated all leading monks and either murdered or defrocked the lesser ones. One estimate is that out of 40,000 to 60,000 monks only 800 to 1,000 survived to carry on their religion. We do know that of 2,680 monks in eight monasteries, merely seventy were alive in 1979. As for the Buddhist temples that populated the landscape of Cambodia, the Khmer Rouge destroyed 95 percent of them, and turned the few remaining into warehouses or allocated them for some other degrading use. Amazingly, in the very short span of a year or so, the small gang of Khmer Rouge wiped out the center of Cambodian culture, its spiritual incarnation, its institutions. ==Media Bias==
Charges of western [[media bias]] in favor of the Communist side have often been made by critics,<ref>Leonard Magruder, “I was there and that’s not the way it was”</ref> who see such alleged bias as being crucial in turning military victories by America into a loss of the war, much by means of propaganda. Underlying the importance of such is the often quoted exchange between Colonel Harry G. Summers, Jr. and his North Vietnamese counterpart, Colonel Tu. During one of his liaison trips to Hanoi, Colonel Summers, Jr. told Tu, "You know, you never beat us on the battlefield," Colonel Tu responded, "That may be so, but it is also irrelevant."<ref>On Strategy: A Critical Analysis of the Vietnam War, Harry G. Summers</ref>
This was an act The success of genocide within the larger Cambodian democide, and it was not the only onepropaganda war has seemed enigmatic to many. In most if not all the country, simply being of Chinese, Vietnamese, Thai, or Lao ancestry meant death. As part of a planned genocide campaign, the Khmer Rouge sought out and killed other minorities, such as the Moslem Cham. In the district of Kompong Xiem, for example, they demolished five Cham hamlets and reportedly massacred 20,000 that lived “If there; in the district of Koong Neas only four Cham apparently survived out of some 20,000. The cadre threw the Cham Grand Mufti, their spiritual leader, into boiling water and then hit him on the head with is to be an iron bar. They beat another leader, the First Mufti, inquiry related to death, tortured and disemboweled the Second MuftiVietnam War, and murdered by starvation in prison it should be into the Chairman of the Islamic Association of Kampuchea (Cambodia). Overall, the Khmer Rouge annihilated nearly half--about 125,000--of all the Cambodian Cham.   As to the other minorities, the Khmer Rouge also slaughtered about 200,000 ethnic Chinese, almost half of those in Cambodia--a calamity for ethnic Chinese reasons why enemy propaganda was so widespread in this part of the world unequaled in modern times--additionallycountry, they murdered 3,000 Protestants and 5,000 Catholics; around 150,000 ethnic Vietnamese (over half); and 12,000 ethnic Thai out of 20,000. One Cambodian peasant, Heng Chan, whose wife was of Vietnamese descent, lost not only his wife, but also five sons, three daughters, three grandchildren, and sixteen of his wife's relatives. In this genocide, why the Khmer Rouge probably murdered 541,000 Chinese, Chams, Vietnamese, and other minorities.  As though this enemy was not enough, by threat of death the Khmer Rouge forced ordinary Cambodians to labor able to condition the point of life-endangering exhaustion, and fed them barely enough public to keep them alive while further weakening their bodies through extreme malnutrition. The Khmer Rouge fed their hard laborers such an average of 800 to 1,200 calories per day, where as for even light labor a worker requires an average of 1,800 calories at a minimum. Nor did extent that the Khmer Rouge provide them with protection against the dangers best educated segments of exposure and disease. Even Pol Pot admitted in 1976 our population (that 80 percent of the peasants had malaria. In many places people died like fish in a heavily polluted stream. The horror is that people are not fish, but thinking, feeling, loving human beings.   As one would expect, in this hell the Khmer Rouge did not spare each other the fear of death either, but often executed their soldiers media and cadre for infractions of minor rules. More important, as the Pol Pot gang maneuvered university elite) gave credence to consolidate its rule over Cambodia, the struggle for power at the top, and the paranoia of top leaders increasedmost incredible allegations. Not only was there the usual despot's fear ” (Final Report - Chief of an assassin's knife in the night, but an intensifying fear that dissident Khmer Rouge might destroy the communist revolution. Increasingly, the Pol Pot gang saw sabotage, and CIA, KGB, or Vietnamese operatives, behind all production failures and project delays.   Purge after purge of high and low Khmer Rouge followed. They increasingly filled the cells of the major security facility in Phnom Penh, Tuol Sleng, with communist officials and cadre. Pol Pot's gang had these people tortured until they fingered collaborators among higherMilitary History -ups, who were then executedU. Confessions were the aim of most torture, and the gang would even arrest, with all the lethal consequences, interrogators who were so crude as to kill their victims before getting a confessionS.  In sum, the Cambodia of the Khmer Rouge was a giant forced labor and death camp, in which all suffered the torments of hell.   As wholesale murderers, the Khmer Rouge is in a class with the Rwandan Hutu government. For rapidly killing a high proportion of their population, they have no competitors. Not even Stalin or Mao could come close. Even Hitler might be shamed by the poor performance of his killers compared to Pol Pot's gang or the Hutu government.<ref>http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/WF.CHAP6.HTM</ref> </blockquote> In 1981, Pol Pot made his famous declaration denying guilt for the brutalities committed by the organisation he led:Government)
British "Encounter" journalist Robert Elegant stated,
<blockquote>
Pol Pot said that he knows that many people For the first time in modern history, the outcome of a war was determined not on the battlefield but on the country hate him printed page and think he’s responsible for , above all, on the killingstelevision screen. He Looking back coolly, I believe it can be said (surprising as it may still sound) that he knows many people died. When he said this he nearly broke down South Vietnamese and criedAmerican forces actually won the limited military struggle. He said he must accept responsibility because They virtually crushed the line was too far to Viet Cong in the leftSouth, and because he didn’t keep proper track of what was going on. He said he was like the master in a house he didn’t know what the kids "native" guerrillas who were up todirected, reinforced, and equipped from Hanoi; and that he trusted people too muchthereafter they threw back the invasion by regular North Vietnamese divisions. For exampleNonetheless, he allowed [one person] the war was finally lost to take care of central committee business the invaders after the U.S. disengagement because the political pressures built up by the media had made it quite impossible for him, [another person] Washington to take care of intellectuals, maintain even the minimal material and [a third person] moral support that would have enabled the Saigon regime to take care of political educationcontinue effective resistance.... These were Never before Vietnam had the people to whom he felt very close, collective policy of the media sought by graphic and he trusted them completely. Then in unremitting distortion, the end victory of the enemies of the correspondents own side.<ref>[http://www.wellesley. they made a mess of everythingedu/Polisci/wj/Vietnam/Readings/elegant.htm How to Lose A War: The Press and Viet Nam]; Encounter (London), vol.LVII, No.. They would tell him things that were not true2, that everything was fineAugust 1981, that this person or that was a traitor. In the end they were the real traitors. The major problem had been cadres formed by the Vietnamesepp.73-90</ref>
</blockquote>
===Failure of US campaign to help the South===
Military, politicalSome journalists have admitted that their reporting was decidedly biased, and social historians have ever after debated why had profound effects on history. West German correspondent Uwe Siemon-Netto confessed, "Having covered the United States was unable to defeat Viet Nam war over a period of five years for West German publications, I am now haunted by the North Vietnameserole we journalists have played over there.
James Q. Wilson wrote: "First, Presidents Kennedy and Johnson both wanted to avoid losing Vietnam without waging a major war in Asia." <ref>When Richard Nixon became president, he wanted In relation to end not reporting the true nature of the Hanoi regime and its actions resulting from the war by pulling out American troopswithdrawal, and he did so. None of the three presidents wanted to winstated, but all wanted to report "progress." All three administrations instructed military commanders always to report gains and rely on suspect body counts as a way of measuring progress. [http://www.opinionjournal.com/federation/feature/?id=110009203] </ref>
Another factor was careerism "Those of the officer corps. The number us who had wanted to find out knew of officers in the US army grew disproportionately from the end evil nature of WWIIthe Hanoi regime. We knew that, with a 1-in-15 ratio dropping 1956, close to 1 50,000 peasants were executed in 6North Viet Nam. Competition for promotions was handled badly by [[General Westmoreland]], who permitted a six month tour We knew that after the division of duty for officers. This was hardly enough time to learn how to engage the enemy successfully, and gave rise country nearly one million North Vietnamese had fled to resentment among the largely workingSouth. Many of us have seen the tortured and carved-class enlisted up bodies of men, women, and children executed by the Viet Cong in the early phases of the war. And many of us saw, in 1968, the mass graves of Hue, saw the corpses of thousands of civilians still festively dressed for Tet, the Vietnamese New Year. {{fact}}"
America "Why, for heaven's sake, did we not report about these expressions of deliberate North Vietnamese strategy at first operated on least as extensively as of the assumption that [[victory by body count]] was possible My Lai massacre and would eventually bring other such isolated incidents that were definitely not part of the North Vietnamese to the peace tableU. There were S. policy in fact peace negotiations following Operation Linebacker II in December 1972, but these succeeded mostly in giving the United States its prisoners back and time Viet Nam?. What prompted us to withdraw from make our readers believe that the fight. It was simply impossible for the North Vietnamese leadershipCommunists, which had been fighting once in some form for 30 years, to imagine the indefinite existence power in all of South Vietnam apart from unification under their ruleViet Nam, would behave benignly? What made us, first and foremost Anthony Lewis, belittle warnings by U.S. officials that a Communist victory would result in a massacre?
==Cost Why did we ignore the fact that the man responsible for the executions of the War==The war exacted a huge human cost50, including an estimated one to two million North and South Vietnamese000 peasants,<ref>http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/modules/vietnam/index.cfm</ref> 100Truong Chinh,000 to 300,000 Cambodians<ref>http://wwwwas—and still is—one of the most powerful figures in Hanoi.mekong.net/cambodia/deaths.htm</ref> What made us think that he and 30-50,000 Laotians.<ref>http://www.vietnamgear.com/casualties.aspx</ref> The "most comprehensive demographic survey" ever conducted on casualties during his comrades would have mercy for the war, as endorsed by the Associated Press, estimated that nearly one million vanquished South Vietnamese? What compelled, Cambodiansfor example, and Laotians were killed throughout Anthony Lewis shortly after the two decades fall of conflict.<ref>Associated Press, April 3, 1995; Charles Hirschman et al., “Vietnamese Casualties During Saigon to pat himself on the American War: A New Estimate,” Population shoulder and Development Reviewwrite, December 1995</ref> R.J. Rummel originally put "so much for the total at 1.2 million Indochinese killed on all sides.<ref>http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/WSJ.ART.HTM</ref> Rummel later revised the estimate to over 2 million in all talk of Indochina, including 1.7 million in North and South Vietnam.<ref>http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/DBG.TAB11.1.GIF</ref> Communist propaganda claimed that 3-6 million died in the war, and some radical anti-war protestors endorsed these figures, although they are not demographically possible.a massacre?"
The most widely cited/accepted estimate, and the middle value of the plausible range (1-2 million Vietnamese) is 1".5 million. This figure is often used in US school textbooks. Keeping in mind that there was Are we journalists not a 50/50 split in part responsible for casualties between Hanoi and Saigon, and that North Vietnam suffered losses far heavier than the South, we could put death of the casualty ratio at 60/40. This would yield a rough estimated total tens of 875,000 North Vietnamese soldiers and civilians killed thousands who drowned? And are we not in part responsible for the war compared hostile reception accorded to 625,000 soldiers and civilians killed in South Vietnamthose who survive?... IfHowever, on the other hand, media have been rather coy; they have not declared that they played a key role in the more recent demographic studies conflict. They have not proudly trumpeted Hanoi's repeated expressions of Charles Hirschman and others are correctgratitude to the mass media of the non-Communist world, then although Hanoi has indeed affirmed that it could not have won "without the real figures were probably closer to 500Western press."<ref>Uwe Siemon-Netto in the International Herald Tribune,000 South Vietnamese and 700reprinted in Encounter,000 North Vietnamese.October 1979</ref>
Over the course of the war, the United States suffered 46,226 battle deaths ''CBS Evening News with 153[[Walter Cronkite]]'' regularly carried news reports from its [[Moscow]] Bureau Chief,311 wounded 5,486 missing and 10,326 non-battle deaths[[Bernard Redmont]]. When peace negotiations 3.3 million troops fought over the course of the war, commenced with the largest number of 625North Vietnam in Paris,866 reached on March 27th, 1969Redmont became ''CBS News'' [[Paris]] Bureau Chief. The North Vietnamese claimed to have lost 1 million men.<Ref>Encyclopedia of Military HistoryWhat Redmont never reported during the ten year conflict was, Dupuy & Dupuy, 1979, Chart Page 1221</Ref> Such Redmont had been a casualty rate, if applied to [[KGB]] operative since the United States1930s, would have meant 13 million Americans killed and 3.9 million missing in actionmember of the notorious [[Silvermaster group]].<ref>Who Lost Vietnam?, by Joseph L[http://hnn. Gallowayus/articles/11581.html KGB file 43173 vol. 2 (v) pp. 46-55], a senior writer for UAlexander Vassiliev, Notes on A.Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S. News & World ReportR., 23 December 1949. Original document from KGB Archives [http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page46.html].</ref> Redmont was the only journalist to whom his fellow [[Comintern]] party member, and North Vietnamese chief negotiator, Mai Van Bo, granted an interview to bring the Communist point of view into American living rooms in what has been called, "the living room war."
{{cquote|'''They were quite a group, the boys The most manifest example of Vietnam -- boys who fought a terrible and vicious war without enough support from home, boys who were dodging bullets while we debated such biased reporting is held to be the efficacy portrayal of the battle. It was often our poor who fought TET offensive, in that war; it which western media was the unpampered boys of the working class who picked up the rifles charged with inspiring and went on aiding the march. They learned not to rely on us; they learned to rely on each other. And they were special in another way: They chose to be faithful. They chose to reject the fashionable skepticism propaganda war of their time. They chose to believe and answer the call of duty. They had the wild, wild courage of youth. They seized certainty from the heart of an ambivalent age; they stood for somethingcommunists.'''
'''And we owe them somethingTruong Nhu Tang stated years later, those boys. We owe them first a promise: That just as they did not forget their missing comrades, neither, ever, will we. And there are other promises. We must always remember that peace is a fragile thing that needs constant vigilance. We owe them a promise to look at the world with a steady gaze and, perhaps, a resigned toughness, knowing that we have adversaries in the world and challenges and the only way to meet them and maintain the peace is by staying strong. <small>---[[President Ronald Reagan]], 1986</small>'''}}
The US bombing and invasion Tet Offensive proved catastrophic to our plans. It is a major irony of Cambodia killed 40,000 combatants and civilians, while US forces in the Vietnam killed over 60,000 (higher estimates go War that our propaganda transformed this debacle into a brilliant victory. The truth was that Tet cost us half our forces. Our losses were so immense that we were unable to over 100replace them with new recruits. (Truong Nhu Tang - Minister of Justice - Viet Cong Provisional Revolutionary Government - The New York Review,000October 21, 1982) Vietnamese.
The death toll from US defeat arguably surpassed that exacted In addition to his biased reporting, FBI documents, obtained through a Freedom of Information Act by [[Yahoo]] news, evidence that legendary CBS News anchor Walter Cronkite collaborated with anti-Vietnam War activists in the 1960s, going so far as to offer advice on how to raise the public profile of protests and even promising that CBS News would rent a helicopter to take liberal Senator [[Edmund Muskie]] to and from the site of an anti-war itselfrally.<ref>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts2067/print</ref>
==Controversies about An ongoing example of such liberal bias is the War=work on Vietnam by the extreme left-wing propagandist, historical revisionist and genocide-denier Marilyn Young, which is required reading in many universities, even though she denies the North Vietnamese "land reform" bloodbath by relying entirely on official Communist press releases (as well as Moise and Porter, who in turn rely entirely on official North Vietnamese press releases). According to her, Communist Vietnam killed only 15,000(!) people at most during the "reform" and all other accounts of its atrocities were fabrications made up by the Western media (hence North Vietnamese media is a more reliable source than any in the West—a point she quite explicitly argues); ''even though official North Vietnamese government records document over 172,000 executions of individuals named as landowners during the 1954-6 period alone''.<ref name="rfa.org"/>
Young ignores the testimony of former North Vietnamese government officials like Hoang Van Chi, as well as foreign witnesses like Gerard Tongas; she denies the irrefutable evidence of the "disappearance" of at least 150,000 landowners from 1953-6;<ref name="ReferenceA">http://www.paulbogdanor.com/left/vietnam/landreform.html</ref> she dismisses US intelligence; accuses Vietnamese experts like Lam Thanh Liem of lying; and mocks the survivors of Communist genocide as CIA propagandists. She endorses [[Max BootNoam Chomsky]] wrote:'s nonsensical lies, ''supports'' the North Vietnamese invasion of South Vietnam, paints a glowing picture of the concentration camps, and reduces the role of Khmer Rouge atrocities to 500-1,000,000 by citing the obscure and unknown Pol Pot apologist Michael Vickery—despite the 1,386,734 victims of execution in the mass graves!
Numerous bits Young further blames America for Pol Pot's rise, attributes all of conventional wisdom have accreted around the Vietnam War. It is commonly held that [[Ho Chi Minh]] was a Vietnamese nationalist above all, not a true [[communist]]deaths in the entire war solely to the United States, and (on page 310) argues that his victory was inevitable. That [[Ngo Dinh Diem]] was an unpopular and repressive [[reactionary]]. That the United States had no vital strategic interest in defending South "boat people" really fled Vietnam. That the ‘[[domino theory]]’ was a myth. That the U.S. was right not due to invade North Vietnam or Laos for fear of triggering Chinese intervention. [[Mark Moyar]]Communist repression, a young, bold, and iconoclastic historian, takes a sledge hammer to these hoary beliefsbut rather the US trade embargo. [His boox] is ‘revisionist’ in She also simply denies the best sense of the word.” [http://www.triumphforsakenHue Massacre.com/]
Jeffrey Record contends Finally, Young claims that South Vietnam was the military was relegated, as a result aggressor and that its imaginary “violation” of its constitutional position, to the role of an accomplice 1973 cease-fire prompted the invasion from the “peace-loving” North—which is not surprising in what Records states was the ''most strategically reckless American enterprise light of the 20th century.'' He charge President Lyndon B. Johnson and Defense Secretary Robert S. McNamara with harshly suppressing their military advisersher reliance on official Communist sources, with Johnson believing that his hawkish Joint Chiefs of Staff were out to destroy his Great Society by although it suggests quite a chasm between their wild-eyed schemesclaims and reality.<ref>The wrong war. Why We Lost in VietnamWars, 1945-90 by Jeffrey RecordMarilyn Young.</ref>
==Media Bias==Notably, all of Young's sources on North Vietnamese crimes come from the North Vietnamese government itself, and she fails to cite a single dissident Vietnamese publication independent of that government in her entire work, while casting suspicion on the honesty of Vietnamese refugees. That she is a respected Professor indoctrinating American youth is consistent with the overall liberal propaganda that has come to characterize American higher education.
Charges of western [[media bias]] in favor of Paul Bogdanor notes: "The bloodbath deniers simply ignore or dismiss the Communist side have often been made by criticsevidence from dissident publications,<ref>Leonard Magruder, “I was there communist defectors and that’s not the way it was”</ref> foreign witnesses. who see such alleged bias as being crucial in turning military victories by America into a loss of the war, much by means of propaganda. Underlying the importance of such is the often quoted exchange between Colonel Harry G. Summers, Jr. and his They rely on official North Vietnamese counterpartpublications, Colonel Tuwhich they take at face value. During one of his liaison trips to Hanoi, Colonel Harry told Tu, "You know, you never beat us This is what passes for scholarship on the battlefield," Colonel Tu responded, "That may be so, but it is also irrelevant'anti-imperialist' left."<refname="ReferenceA"/>On Strategy: A Critical Analysis And Young is but one gulag-denying professor out of the Vietnam War, Harry Gmany. Summers</ref>
The success Young's denial of the propaganda war has seemed enigmatic to many. “If there "land reform" bloodbath is to be not unique. Gareth Porter, an inquiry related to investigative historian and journalist on U.S. national security policy, wrote the Vietnam Warkey bloodbath-denial work, it should be into titled simply "The Myth of the reasons why enemy propaganda was so widespread in this countryBloodbath." Professor Robert F. Turner, drawing on his knowledge of thousands of captured Viet Cong documents, scores of interviews with Communist defectors, and why extensive research on the enemy was able to condition the public to such an extent that the best educated segments "land reform;" carefully refuted all of our population (that isPorter's charges, media demonstrating that they could not withstand any serious critical scrutiny and university elite) gave credence to that some 300,000 people were, in fact, killed during the most incredible allegationsgenocide.” (Final Report - Chief of Military History - U<ref>http://www.Spaulbogdanor.com/deniers/vietnam/turner. Government)pdf</ref>
British "Encounter" journalist Robert Elegant statedPorter is shown repeatedly contradicting himself,lying, making judgments that lack evidence and credibility, and accusing others of mistranslating a language he could barely speak. Although Porter's work was apparently sufficient to convince Young, its manifest sloppiness is contrary to honest scholarship. Vietnamese scholar Hoang Van Chi (1913-1988), who worked as a revolutionary and diplomat writing history and political science, also responded to Porter, who accused him of being a CIA propagandist in a ridiculous ad hominem attack.<ref>http://www.paulbogdanor.com/deniers/vietnam/chi.pdf</ref> Porter would later deny the Cambodian genocide and express admiration and outspoken support for Pol Pot in the infamous ''Cambodia: Starvation and Revolution.''
For Many US reporters admired the first time in modern historyKhmer Rouge, while prominent intellectuals openly denied the outcome of Cambodian genocide. During the genocide, human rights abuses in Chile and South Korea got more coverage than Cambodia.<ref>"Irvine derived from the Television News Index and Abstracts a war was determined not statistical table on media coverage of human rights in Chile, South Korea, North Korea, Cuba and Cambodia. The news organizations covered were the battlefield but on New York Times, the printed page Washington Post, and the three television screens - never before Vietnam had networks, ABC, CBS, and NBC in 1976. The findings were startling. In table 4.1, the collective policy of reader will see that, contrary to the media soughtPorter-Hildebrand-Chomsky-Herman claims, by graphic the New York Times and unremitting distortionWashington Post published four and nine stories on human rights in Cambodia, respectively. According to table 4.1, Chile received more than eight times the victory coverage "on human rights problems" as did Cambodia. South Korea was covered merely 5.6 times more often. The total allocation of media resources to Cambodia paled in comparison to the enemies of massive campaign against Chile and South Korea, two non-communist countries. Perhaps the correspondents own sidereason why Chomsky and Herman used anecdotal evidence to prove their theories was because they knew that aggregate analysis would show they were wrong.<ref>[" Sophal Ear. "The Khmer Rouge Canon." http://wwwjim.wellesleycom/canon.eduhtm</Polisciref> Some journalists, mocking the claims of a bloodbath, were so bold as to sing the following lyrics to the tune of "She Was Poor But She Was Honest": "Oh will there be a dreadful bloodbath/wjWhen the Khmer Rouge come to town?/VietnamAye, there'll be a dreadful bloodbath/Readings/elegant.htm How When the Khmer Rouge come to Lose A Wartown."<ref>http: The Press and Viet Nam]; Encounter (London), vol//jim. LVII, Nocom/canon. 2, August 1981, pp. 73-90htm#ch2</ref>
Some journalists have admitted that their reporting was decidedly biased, and had profound effects on history. West German correspondent Uwe Siemon-Netto confessed, "Having covered the Viet Nam ==Vietnam War in Popular Culture==The war over a period of five years for West German publications, I am now haunted by the role we journalists have played over there." In relation to not reporting the true nature of the Hanoi regime and its actions resulting from aftermath were the American withdrawalinspiration for several films, he askedincluding ''The Green Berets'', ''The Deer Hunter'', ''Platoon'', ''Hamburger Hill'', and ''We Were Soldiers''.
What prompted us to make our readers believe that the Communists, once in power in all The TV series ''Tour of Viet Nam, would behave benignly? What made us, first and foremost Anthony Lewis, belittle warnings by Duty'' was about a U.S. officials that a Communist victory would result Army platoon in a massacre?... Are we journalists not in part responsible for country around the death time of the tens of thousands who drowned? And are we not in part responsible for the hostile reception accorded to those who survive?[[Tet Offensive]]. The series ''Magnum, P.I'', ''Night Court'', ''Airwolf'', and ''Area 88'' all had Vietnam veterans as main or major characters.However In the military drama series ''JAG, '' the media have been rather coy; they have not declared that they played main character's father was a key role in US Navy pilot lost over North Vietnam, and the conflict. They have not proudly trumpeted Hanoimain character's repeated expressions of gratitude desire to find out what happened to him is the mass media focus of a major story arc over the non-Communist worldfirst few seasons. In addition, although Hanoi the spinoff ''NCIS: Los Angeles'' has indeed affirmed that it could not have won "without the Western press."<ref>Uwe Siemon-Netto in major character Henrietta Lang having conducted operations during Vietnam, and at least two arcs during the International Herald Tribune8th and 9th seasons involving her dealt with the Vietnam War, reprinted in Encounteror more accurately, October 1979</ref>the aftermath.
''CBS Evening News with ===Quotes===See: [[Walter Cronkite]]'' regularly carried news reports from its [[Moscow]] Bureau Chief, [[Bernard Redmont]]. When peace negotiations commenced with North Vietnam in Paris, Redmont became ''CBS News'' [[Paris]] Bureau Chief. What Redmont never reported during the ten year conflict was, Redmont had been a [[KGB]] operative since the 1930s, and member of the notorious [[Silvermaster group]]. <ref>[http://hnn.us/articles/11581.html KGB file 43173 vol. 2 (v) pp. 46-55], Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949. Original document from KGB Archives [http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page46.html].</ref> Redmont was the only journalist to whom his fellow [[CominternWar Quotes]] party member, and North Vietnamese chief negotiator, Mai Van Bo, granted an interview to bring the Communist point of view into American living rooms in what has been called, "the living room war."
The most manifest example of such biased reporting is held to be the portrayal of the [[TET offensive]], in which western media was charged with inspiring and aiding the propaganda war of the communists. Truong Nhu Tang stated years later, The Tet Offensive proved catastrophic to our plans. It is a major irony of the Vietnam War that our propaganda transformed this debacle into a brilliant victory. The truth was that Tet cost us half our forces. Our losses were so immense that we were unable to replace them with new recruits. (Truong Nhu Tang - Minister of Justice - Viet Cong Provisional Revolutionary Government - The New York Review, October 21, 1982) In addition to his biased reporting, FBI documents, obtained through a Freedom of Information Act by [[Yahoo]] news, evidence that legendary CBS News anchor Walter Cronkite collaborated with anti-Vietnam War activists in the 1960s, going so far as to offer advice on how to raise the public profile of protests and even promising that CBS News would rent a helicopter to take liberal Senator Edmund Muskie to and from the site of an anti-war rally.<ref>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts2067/print</ref> Many US reporters admired the Khmer Rouge, while prominent intellectuals openly denied the Cambodian genocide. During the genocide, human rights abuses in Chile and South Korea got more coverage than Cambodia. Some journalists, mocking the claims of a bloodbath, were so bold as to sing the following lyrics to the tune of "She Was Poor But She Was Honest": "Oh will there be a dreadful bloodbath/ When the Khmer Rouge come to town?/ Aye, there'll be a dreadful bloodbath/ When the Khmer Rouge come to town."<ref>http://jim.com/canon.htm#ch2</ref> ==Vietnam War in Popular CultureSee also==The war and its aftermath were the inspiration for several films, including ''* [[The Green BeretsAllen Ross Culpepper]]'', ''* [[The Deer HunterM-16]]'', ''and [[Platoon (film)|PlatoonM-14]]'', ''[[Hamburger Hill]]'', rifles used by America and ''the [[We Were SoldiersSouth Vietnamese]]''. The TV series ''* [[Tour of Duty (television series)|Tour of DutyKalashnikov]]'' was about a U.S. Army platoon in country around the time of the ([[Tet OffensiveAK-47]]. The series '') and [[Magnum, P.ISKS]]'', ''rifles used by [[Night CourtViet Cong]]'', ''* [[AirwolfList of wars involving the United States]]'', and ''* [[Area 88Battle of Hamburger Hill]]'' all had Vietnam veterans as main or major characters. In the military drama series ''[[JAG (TV series|JAG]],'' the main character's father was a US Navy pilot lost over North Vietnam, and the main character's desire to find out what happened to him is the focus of a major story arc over the first few seasons.
==References==
<references/>{{reflist}}
==Further reading==
*[http://www.onpower.org/foreign_regional_Asia.html#10 Vietnam War].
*[http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2391209/posts?page=3 Capt. Marshal Hanson, U.S.N.R (Ret.) Capt. Scott Beaton, Vietnam (Fact vs Fiction)]
*[http://www.i-served.com/v-v-a-r.org/VietnamAndTheMedia_part01.html Vietnam and the Media, part 1] ([https://web.archive.org/web/20071005220621/http://www.i-served.com/v-v-a-r.org/VietnamAndTheMedia_part01.html archived])*[http://www.viet-myths.net/Turner.htm Myths and Realities in the Vietnam Debate]*[http://www.rjsmith.com/war_myth.html Vietnam War Myths]*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F67C8yzww_Y How the Vietnam War Was Won and Lost by Prager University]*[http://www.oldmagazinearticles.com/article-summary/goldwater-on-vietnam#.YH9ZLyWSmUk Goldwater on Vietnam][[Category:Wars]]
[[Category:United States History]]
[[Category:Vietnam War]]
[[categoryCategory:Cold War]][[Category:Veterans]]
23
edits