|
|
| (178 intermediate revisions by 54 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Now I see that you are back. Great. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 21:08, 1 November 2007 (EDT)
| + | {{Retired}} |
| − | | + | |
| − | Welcome back!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:14, 11 January 2008 (EST)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | : Are you back? --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 10:21, 5 February 2008 (EST)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == My vandal counter ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | It's there, but I had to hide it, because it attracted too many <s>Bohdans</s> vandals. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 00:03, 5 February 2008 (EST)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Could you have a read of [[Holodomor denial]]. Thanks.--[[User:Bandurist|Bandurist]] 12:30, 23 February 2008 (EST)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Sysop ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Welcome back to your Sysop status, Bohdan! We've missed you, and your expertise about Eastern Europe.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:46, 29 February 2008 (EST)
| + | |
| − | :Thanks! But I might not be very active... Nevertheles, I will try to help. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 14:58, 29 February 2008 (EST)
| + | |
| − | ::Congratulations Bohdan. [[User:Absentismens|Absentismens]] 01:26, 3 March 2008 (EST)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Question ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Is there a place I can ask the community as a whole something?--'''''<span style="border: 2px #000000 solid;background:#FFD800; font-variant:small-caps">[[User:FellowChristian16|<font color="#000000">Fellow</font>]][[User talk:FellowChristian16|<font color="#000000">Christian16</font>]]</span>''''' 16:36, 19 March 2008 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | I also have a question. Currently there are three broken redirects. Should I delete the redirects and request deletion of the page? or just name the pages and allow a sysop to delete them? [[User:DrCB|DrCB]] 21:35, 20 March 2008 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Really random ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | I was taking a nap today and you were in my dream. I had a dream that my real life cat (who's name is Jazz... my secret's out) was actually a housefly, and not a cat. And then my cousin found out that she was actually a unicorn and she was flying around the house trying to catch and eat my pet fly. And then it wasn't my pet cat/fly named Jazz, it was my pet cat/fly named Bohdan. I was all like "oh no, cousin! Don't eat Bohdan, I will be sad!"
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | I have strange dreams. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 22:09, 20 March 2008 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | :I am so honored :) [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 22:39, 20 March 2008 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == deletion of lawyer values ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Dear Bohdan,
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Could you please explain why you deleted this article?
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | thanks--[[User:JBuscombe|JBuscombe]] 16:41, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | also what is this WP:POINT?--[[User:JBuscombe|JBuscombe]] 16:50, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | :It was unencyclopedic, and obviously just a response to [[professor values]]. If you have a problem with that article, go to the [[Talk:Professor values|talk page]]. Please do not create unencyclopedic articles to make a point. It is disruptive. Thanks, [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 16:51, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | WP:POINT is a policy on wikipedia. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:POINT] [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 16:52, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ::Dear Bohdan
| + | |
| − | How can you say [[Lawyer values]] is unencyclopedic and disruptive while [[Professor values]] are not? It was not just a response to the Professor values, but was inspired by it! I do not believe it was in any way disruptive. I am sure the public opinion about lawyers are more in line with what I wrote while the public still respect Professors. --[[User:JBuscombe|JBuscombe]] 17:04, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | ::::I point you to the newly-created [[logical fallacy#Ad hominem tu quoque|tu quoque]]. You don't have to show that professor values is right to show that lawyer values is wrong. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 21:35, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | :::I actually never said I consider professor values to be encyclopedic. But the author of that article is the owner of the site, and he has said before that it won't be deleted. Please take any issues you have with professor values to its talk page. Thanks, [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 17:57, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | ::::Did you just delete something for breaking a rule that ''doesn't exist on this site''? --[[User:Gulik5|Gulik5]] 21:32, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
| + | |
