Changes

<!--------------------------------------><!-- STOP! LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW! THANKS--><!--------------------------------------><div style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; margin-bottom: 0; width: 100%; background-color: #4f402b; height: 200px180px; color: white; padding: 0;"> <div style="-moz-border-radius-bottomright: 16px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 16px; float:left; background-color: #97c000; width: 85%; height: 160px; margin-top: 20px; padding-left: 0.5em10px;"><div style="font-size: 200%; text-align: center; padding-top: 0.1em10px;">Welcome to CPWebmaster's (aka: [[User:AmesG/PanelEvolution|Fearless Leader]]) talk page</div><div style="font* Please leave your comments/suggestions/anything else below* I will get back to you ASAP* Please, no complaints* Archives are on the right -size: 70%; text-align: center; padding: 0.2em;">This talk page is best viewed in Mozilla Firefox.</div>over there* Thanks and happy editing!

 <div style="-moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 16px; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 16px; float: right; background-color: #74c0fa; width: 10%; height: 160px; margin-top: 20px10px; text-align: center;"><div style="font-size: 120%;">[[User_talk:CPWebmaster/Archive1|Archive1]]<br />[[User_talk:CPWebmaster/Archive2|Archive2]]<br />[[User_talk:CPWebmaster/Archive3|Archive3]]</div>

<div style="width: 100%; background-color: #4f402b; height[http: 100%; color: white; padding//1heckofaguy.com/wp-content/_2thumbs.jpg] -bottom-[[User: 20px;"TK|'''₮K''']]_{<div style="-moz-border-radius-bottomrightsmall><small>/Administrator</small></small>}^{[[User_Talk: 16px; -moz-border-radius-toprightTK|/Talk]]} 06: 16px; background-color: #fff; width: 85%; margin-left: 0; margin-right: auto; padding: 0.5em; color: black;">20, 8 January 2009 (EST)

Dude, what is the deal with [[Special:Upload]]? I can ''never'' cause it to function appropriately. --[[User:Linus M.|Liπus the Turbogeek]]^{(Thanks! [[User talk:Linus M.CPWebmaster|contact meCPWebmaster]])} 1822:5815, 10 April 2007 8 January 2009 (EDTEST)

==PicNew addition to Spam filter?==LOL! Love the banner on your user page. Ames will be pleased :P. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font>^{<font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font>} 19:58, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

== User BoxesI think a new string has been added to the spam filter in the last week--it's four colons : in a row.That's going to cause all sorts of problems with the indenting on talk pages.. ==Would you be able to check and remove it if it's there? -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 12:16, 10 January 2009 (EST)

==Love==I think the new look of your Seem to be missing from check user page is simply ''fabulous!''.Can we get them back? --[[User:Rob PommerTK| Cracker'''₮K''']]_{<small><small>/Admin</small></small>}<sup>[[User_talkUser_Talk:Rob_PommerTK|talk/Talk]]</subsup> 2107:3530, 12 April 2007 14 January 2009 (EDTEST)

Hello! Just so you know, TK and I figured out that you can put the accent in Joaquin's name - it's just every page before the crash that had an accent in its title was somehow corrupted. See [[Niccolò_Machiavelli]])--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style=Sysop Pledge"color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 23:32, 29 January 2009 (EST):Ah, I see you discovered that on your own - sorry for the post, then.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 23:33, 29 January 2009 (EST)

As my good deed of At [[Salvador Dali]] there are many images that have a problem related to the day ´. Could you fix it or do I am requesting have to upload again all the images? The big problem is that you place this template on your userpagebug is in all images with an special thing like "Ñs" or "´". Participating sysops will earn my respect and gratitude. --[[User:BenjaminS|BenjaminS]] 23:55, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

Ben... OK, thank you're a riot . --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[Usertalk:CPWebmasterJoaquín Martínez|CPWebmastertalk]] 1014:5317, 13 April 2007 3 February 2009 (EDTEST)

==Proposed Block PolicyMaths problem ==There has recently been some disagreement over blocks, so I have created a [[User:CPAdmin1/Proposed Block Policy|proposed block policy]]Tell me what you think. --[[User:CPAdmin1|CPAdmin1]] 23:23, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

The Maths codes are not working, and are preventing pages with them being displayed. That they weren't working was reported on [[Conservapedia: Responded via emailDesk/Miscellany]], but now trying to even display that page produces a database syntax error. The same applies to my talk page. [[User:Philip J. dislike itRayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 03:20, 3 February 2009 (EST): I see that problem has gone, although the maths codes themselves are still not working. [[User:CPWebmasterPhilip J. Rayment|CPWebmasterPhilip J. Rayment]] 1008:5318, 13 April 2007 3 February 2009 (EDTEST)

::GoshI saw changes to CP Desk just now, that is so "un-wiki" likeclicked on it, a private response, I would have been insulted for doing that, lol. --~ [[Usergot this message:TK|TK]] ^{[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]} 04:01, 14 April 2007 (EDT)

:::Philip, could you please explain what you have against my policy<blockquote>A database query syntax error has occurred. --[[User:CPAdmin1|CPAdmin1]] 09This may indicate a bug in the software. The last attempted database query was:32, 14 April 2007 (EDT)

:::: Tim, I believe that this Wiki is something like a free-market. You have the supply (us editors) and the demand (people who want to use the site). What usually happens when a free-market becomes regulated? It is no longer free. Rules and regulations destroy the system. [[User:CPWebmaster|CPWebmaster]] 09:44, 14 April 2007 (EDTSQL query hidden)

from within function "MathRenderer::_recall". MySQL returned error "1267:::So you prefer Anarchy? Illegal mix of collations (latin1_swedish_ci,IMPLICIT) and (utf8_general_ci,COERCIBLE) for operation '=' (localhost)".</blockquote>--[[User:CPAdmin1TK|'''₮K''']]_{<small><small>/Admin</small></small>}^{[[User_Talk:TK|CPAdmin1/Talk]] 14} 17:3506, 14 April 2007 3 February 2009 (EDTEST)

::Yea, that was the error Philip just mentioned above. I was testing the math out, apparently I haven't got it working yet! [[User:CPWebmaster|CPWebmaster]] 17:10, 3 February 2009 (EST):: No Tim: I was having the same problems, but now some of them seem to be fixed too. Rules Thank you for all the hard work you've done. The math pages still have some issues: see [[:Category:Mathematics]] for a sample of pages with names that had non-English characters that have now become garbled. Redirects from the unaccented pages are essential throwing database errors too: see [[Sierpinski triangle]], which redirects to the site such as no obscenity, etcproblematic "Sierpiński triangle". are I looked into other fallout with the only rules that are neededmath articles and it seems "Sierpiński's constant" (which became "<nowiki>Sierpi%C3%85%E2%80%9Eski%27s_constant</nowiki>") got deleted before the cause of the problem was ascertained. In I don't remember that page, but based on the real world this would be comparable to laws against murdertime of the deletion, stealing, etcI'd guess it was mistakenly deleted when the garbled characters suddenly appeared when CP came back online. It probably should be undeleted. I can only imagine what miracles you're pulling behind the scenes. Keep up the good work! You have all our support. -[[User:CPWebmasterFoxtrot|CPWebmasterFoxtrot]] 17:0512, 14 April 2007 3 February 2009 (EDTEST)

==Unblock MykJoaquin ==I have agreed to unblocking Myk. Is there a function with which to do so? [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 01:09, 13 April 2007 (EDT)

*Thanks, Karajou, : In the mid time could I was supposed get the possibility to message you too, but so much is happening it was delayed. upload new images? I will do it for you, the unblocking.Joaquin --~ [[User:TKJMR10|TKJMR10]] ^{15:17, 4 February 2009 (EST) --[[User_talkUser:TKJMR10|MyTalkJMR10]]} 0120:34, 5 February 2009 (EST) --[[User:JMR10|JMR10]] 23:02, 13 April 2007 7 February 2009 (EDTEST)

== Change to the T-Rex pageSysops ==CPwebmaster, why the change on the T-Rex page? The research was cited and just released. Did you happen to read it before reverting?--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 12:04, 13 April 2007 (EDT):I don't agree with TimS' edits (and I will explain why on the talk page tomorrow), but neither do I agree with the amount that you removed. In cases like there where there is obviously or likely to be disagreement, couldn't you at the very least explain your rationale in the edit comment or on the talk page? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 12:27, 13 April 2007 (EDT):: Yes... I did remove too much information... fixed [[User:CPWebmaster|CPWebmaster]] 12:43, 13 April 2007 (EDT)

== Missing Links Funny characters ==

For the computer illiterate, like me, would Hi. Just to let you consider restoring the link know that there are still a very few pages where special characters seem to "be causing problems - see [[Special Pages" on :DoubleRedirects]] (in the left? It is missing on several pages case of Machiavelli and Balboa, I was just oncan't access the pages they are redirecting to). Not a big problem, but shows here on your own page.....one that could use tidying up when you have time. Thanks--~ [[User:TK|TK]] ^{[[User_talk:TKCPalmer|MyTalkCPalmer]]} 0610:3327, 14 April 2007 10 February 2009 (EDTEST)

== Good block Unaccessible Titles ==

Good block this morningHey CPWebmaster, I'm really sorry to burden you with yet another issue, but I've just now discovered a problem that I think may not be fixable. The contributor has made many valid edits[[Front de libération du Québec]] was recently deleted by a sysop, so I assumed that there was another bad title due to the one week time period special characters. However, with every title previously, I've been able to access the "messed up" title, and then I could just point it to a sysop and the sysop could move it. With this article - I can not access it. You can verify that the page exists [http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Search?search=+in+which+British+Trade+Commissioner+%5B%5BJames+Cross%5D%5D+was+kidnapped+and+Quebec+Labor+Minister+%5B%5BPierre+Laporte%5D%5D+was+murdered.&go=Go here],but sadly the link doesn't work - it takes you to the correctly formatted page - which was deleted (and even if the page wasn't deleted, it would be useless anyway). My only hope is appropriatethat perhaps it's my computer or maybe that you know of some back alley you could possibly take (or perhaps you could at least access the content of the article). I'm sorry I can't offer you any help, but I wish you the best of luck. Once again, I apologize for being the bearer of bad news.--<small>[[User:AschlaflyIduan|Aschlafly<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]] [[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 21:36, 11February 2009 (EST):24Wow that's amazing - great job!--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 22:50, 14 April 2007 11 February 2009 (EDTEST)

== request Bible references ==

I sent a letter of assistance regarding our abortion articles to right Sorry to life groups and I sent about 40 emailsbother you again, but it seems there's a problem with the automatic Bible reference tagger. Keep an eye on my user discussion page for people saying they are interested in being Admins/SYSOPS. Look at their edits and promote them to Admins The links (like this: Numbers 17:13) only work if you think it is warrantedhave certain skins chosen (see [[User talk:Ed Poor#New page]]). Here This is a really useful feature so it would be good to get it working for all users in my discussion page: http://wwwopinion.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Conservative Thanks--[[User:ConservativeCPalmer|ConservativeCPalmer]] 2212:3529, 14 April 2007 19 February 2009 (EDTEST)conservative

:Could you please revert ==Page Count==Hey,Conservative ended up resetting the page count on [[macroevolutionevolution]] article from 500,000 to 0 by deleting the way it was before it was submitted to the panel? I left you a diff on the talk page. I understood that this tried restoring the page, but only the history was restored and the policy regarding page count is still the panel - at least that's new one. Do you know how it was with to get the old page count back?? [[evolution]].-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''_{[httpUser://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!AddisonDM|AddisonDM]]} 1120:5242, 15 April 2007 3 March 2009 (EDTEST)

::I really don't *Addison, the page count you see why this should be done. The article in its present state is perfectly acceptable. Alsointernal, I means absolutely nothing, and does not effect our rankings, or anything else, as the search engine bots don't know of read the policy you speak ofinternal counters. Can If a Senior Administrator like Conservative does that, I would advise you point it out? Thanks to check with Mr. Schlafly before initiating any actions on your own. --[[User:CPWebmasterTK|'''₮K''']]_{<small><small>/Admin</small></small>}^{[[User_Talk:TK|CPWebmaster/Talk]] 12} 20:1252, 15 April 2007 3 March 2009 (EDTEST)

== :Actually I talked with him telling him this and he asked if I could restore the internal page count. [[CPUser:RFAAddisonDM|AddisonDM]] ==20:54, 3 March 2009 (EST)

Someone needs to periodically update ::Well, then actually, he should have asked, but we have been through thisbefore with him, and take the appropriate course of action for it could not be reset, was the applicantsanswer we got then. No matter, and you seem to be a likely canidate. ThanksI am sure Phillip will do what he can. :D -- --[[User:HackerTK|Hacker'''₮K''']]<supsub><codesmall><small>/Admin</small></small></sub>^{([[User talkUser_Talk:HackerTK|Write some code/Talk]])</code>} 21:5319, 16 April 2007 3 March 2009 (EDTEST)

== Anti Gun Spellcheck==I noticed on another wiki that when editing an article, misspelled words were underlined by red, like in Microsoft Word. Is this part of the wiki software? If so, maybe it should be installed? I don't know if you know how, but please look into that. It would eliminate many mistakes in our articles. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 22:09, 20 March 2009 (EDT)

I'm anti-gun==suggested searches==Hey Philip, however I like you know how on Wikipedia when you begin to play devil's advocate sometimessearch it pulls down as list, and if you mistype something it comes up on the next page with "Were you looking for. I do not believe that academic discourse can progress without competing ideas. --.." Do you know if those are features we could turn on here, or do they have to do with which version of MediaWiki is installed? [[User:TrueGritAddisonDM|TrueGritAddisonDM]] 2014:3001, 17 April 2007 9 June 2009 (EDT)

CPWebmaster, I was upholding the decision of the panel. See the discussion on Philip J. Rayment's talk page [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Philip_J._Rayment#question_regarding_pro_evolutionary_books_being_added_to_TOE_article here]. The Panel approved a version of the article ''with'' the free online text of "The Origin of Species", though Conservative removed the link merely eight minutes before the Panel made it's decision (Conservative removed book at 18:21 April 9, decision made 18:29 April 9); clearly too short of a time, as the panel had been deliberating for quite some time. Andy has also made his anti-censorship view very explicit. Other sysops had also supported the inclusion of the book, as it is the single most relevant book on the topic that exists. The pro-inclusion sysops provided their reasons and justifications, though Conservative kept reverting without ''any'' justification, or discussion (except for an attempt to draw the conversation off topic at [[Talk:Theory of evolution]]). Perhaps you should warn [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] to not work against what has been made explicitly clear. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font>^{<font colorArticle Request =="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font>} 19:56, 18 April 2007 (EDT)

: Where does the Panel's decision state Just something that the ref's cannot be changed? It doesn'tI wanted to ask.. Please do not get into any more revert wars with Conservative or any other user. Thank could you. [[User:CPWebmaster|CPWebmaster]] 19:58, 18 April 2007 (EDT):: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Theory_of_evolution&diff=prev&oldid=96144 Here] is where the panel says please take down that addition 'satire of references and further reading books is acceptable. And please, warn the other party in this edit war as well, as he is equally guilty. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|atheism'''Hojimachong''']]</font>^{<font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font>} 20:02, 18 April 2007 (EDT)::: I'm talking about picture on the revert wars in general, not Atheism article? Or unlock it so much this specific case. [[User:CPWebmaster|CPWebmaster]] 20:06, 18 April 2007 (EDT):::: Forgive me, but that I can take it is hard to avoid an edit war when you cite justifications for your edits, ''prove'' that you are undoubtedly correct, out? It seems rude and the [[User:Conservative|other user]] provides no justification and runs from answering any kind of question. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font>^{<font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font>} 20:07biased, 18 April 2007 (EDT)<br><br>::::What other revert wars is [[User:Hojimachong| Hojimachong]] engaged as well as being false in?[[User:Rob Pommer| Rob Pommer]]_{[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]} 20:14, 18 April 2007 (EDT):::::None, at the momentits statement. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font>^{<font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font>} 20:16Or, 18 April 2007 (EDT):::::: You're dodging the bullet. Please just don't get into any revert wars. They waste everyone's time. [[User:CPWebmaster|CPWebmaster]] 20:17, 18 April 2007 (EDT)::::::: I fully understand that edit wars are bad to engage in, and should be avoided. But I think you are missing my point as well; There was evidence to back up add a specific view, posted on the talk page, and told to Conservative even 'satire of christianity'before'' he removed the books (He ''asked'' Philip J. Rayment about removing the books. Philip said he shouldn't; Conservative did it anyways). I think Conservative needs to be reprimanded in some way, shape, or form; I don't see him being warned for the edit warChristianity article. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font>^{<font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font>} 20:19, 18 April 2007 (EDT):::::::: Once again, Conservative made a change against the panel, consensus, and Andy. When is this ''vandalism'' going to be taken note of? --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font>^{<font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:HojimachongKnightOfTheNight|talkKnightOfTheNight]]</font>} 2221:0245, 18 April 2007 11 July 2009 (EDT)KnightOfTheNight

CPWebmaster, I want to highlight two things that you said:* "''I'm talking about the revert wars in generalYou must be confused, not so much this specific caseKnight.''"* "''You're dodging the bullet. Please just don't get into any revert wars. They waste everyone's time.''"Okay This is a Christian wiki, perhaps Hojimachong has been involved in other edit wars; I haven't checkeda conservative and Christian encyclopedia. And if trueWhat atheists are displeased about, and if that is bothers us not true of Conservativeat all, then perhaps you do have a defence and we don't apologize for what is otherwise a prima-facie case of favouritismthat. But you also seem We don't try to be "dodging the bullet" yourself. On Wikipedianeutral at all, ''both'' editors either, for that would have been given blocks twice over for this particular incident, mean ignoring facts and ''both'' editors are "wasting everyone's time"the truth. You also said--[[User:* "TK|''Where does the Panel's decision state that the refṬK's cannot be changed? It doesn't.''"That's precisely the point. I "changed" (added) some references (books for further reading)]]_{<small><small>/Admin</small></small>}^{[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]} 00:12, and Conservative started the revert war 12 July 2009 (in the sense that he made the first reversionEDT) by removing them on the grounds that they were against the Panel's decision. You have here acknowledged that they are not against the Panel's decision, indicating that it was Conservative who was in the wrong, yet it is Hojimaching that you are warning.

[[User:Philip J-My younger brother Mark just registered for the economics course homework under the name of MarkGB, and cannot edit. Rayment|Philip JI noticed that you said in an edit summary that new users were having trouble editing. Rayment]] 23:10Can you give him the appropriate rights please? Thanks, 18 April 2007 (EDT)Duncan

Hi. I've just noticed that when you look at an old version of a page (eg [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bank_run&oldid= Problems with my watchlist ==745983 this one], the header saying that it is an old version of a page contains some stray HTML tags. Is this a problem that can be fixed?--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 11:55, 18 January 2010 (EST)

I appear to be having problems with my watchlist. Occasionally I notice articles that are changed are not appearing on my watchlist. It appears to be articles which have been protected. Protected articles that I put on my watchlist== Thanksgiving, or that I edit, are okay, but articles that I already have on my watchlist that are then protected don't appear, at least sometimes (until I edit them again). [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:18, 21 April 2007 (EDT)2010 ==

: HeHello.I was going to fix the double redirects and was able to get to two of them but the rest are locked to prevent editing. Most of them seem to be talk pages for various "essays". I wouldn's not blockedt have bothered you but the person who did the locking has his talk page locked and I cannot figure out how to bring up this subject with the individual.Thank you and God bless. [[User:CPWebmasterDevonJ|CPWebmasterDevonJ]] 0016:0634, 22 April 2007 1 February 2011 (EDTEST)

== Please vote for me Problem with the database? ==

Please vote for me hereHi, you seem to be the tech guy of this wiki - I got your name via [[Help: httpContents]]'s "handy list" of [[Special://wwwListUsers&group=bureaucrat|bureaucrats]].conservapediaMy question: is there a problem with the database? At least two of my comments vanished without leaving any trace.com/ConservapediaThe damage isn't great:Request_for_Bureaucratship I was able to reconstruct the [[User_talk:DouglasA#My_comments|longer comment]] from a draft which was still stored in my cache. But perhaps other users were afflicted by such glitches, too. I would really appreciate if you could have a look into it! Thanks, [[User:ConservativeAugustO|ConservativeAugustO]] 1909:3854, 22 April 2007 3 May 2011 (EDT)

== Changing User Name Bible Translation Project ==

I'm wondering how am going to start a Bible Translation project for the Philippines. I can change my User Name. Can it be done? If so, how? Please let me know. --[[User:Jtpaladin|Jtpaladin]] 21:47, 27 April 2007 (EDT): It would probably be best like to just create a new account. [[User:CPWebmaster|CPWebmaster]] 23:10talk with some folks to learn some insights, 2 May 2007 (EDT)::Any bureaucrat can handle a name change for youespecially "what we would do differently had we only known from the beginning... <font color="FFD700">[[User:ColinR|ColinR]]</font>^{<font color="000000">[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</font>} 02:09, 3 May 2007 (EDT).

== My contributions ==conservative views are very similar to many that I see. I would appreciate any advice, tips, ect.

I think there's something wrong with my contributions, all edits prior to today seem to have vanished [http://wwwThanks.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Aschl%D0%B0fly link]. Would you be able to look into it for me? Thank you and God bless. [[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:17, 1 May 2007 (EDT): No there isn't. Look back in the recent changes for the creation of a new 'User:Aschlafly'. --<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">Wik</font><font color="#444444" face="Times New Roman">i</font><font color="#666666" face="Times New Roman">nterpreter</font>'''^{[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Wikinterpreter talk?]}:: [http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Log/newusers Here]. --<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">Wik</font><font color="#444444" face="Times New Roman">i</font><font color="#666666" face="Times New Roman">nterpreter</font>'''^{[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Wikinterpreter talk?]}

So is it possible to ban the fake ASchlafly and the fake Conservative before they do more damage to the site and to the reputations of the real things?--[[User:EpicuriusTheYachtsman|SteveTheYachtsman]] 135:2530PM, 1 May 2007 16 August 2011 (EDTCDT)

To all senior admins and sysops. I am being repeatedly abused by user:Sureconservative who, as long as among other things, accuses me continuously of being an atheist simply because I point out some of the person doing it know what they are doing and pays attentionholes in his articles. OhSee [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&curid=113357&diff=924642&oldid=924636 here for the latest accusation].I have asked him numerous times to desist with his sneering name calling as I find it offensive to have my faith questioned and nothing is ever done.He state’s I am atheist because I don’t agree with some of his ridiculous contentions.In actual fact it isn’t even that I disagree with him it is that I point out his shoddy research, poor scholarship and his berating, insulting and sarcastic behaviour towards others.I am of the opinion now that he is purposely calling me names because he knows I don’t like it which is unchristian, impolite and, above all, insulting.Is anyone going to teach this man some manners? Has Conservapedia become a place where Conservative is allowed to behave this way without any warning or comeuppance but all other editors and warned and blocked for minor infractions. He is in continual violation of the commandments yet NOTHING is done whereas people like myself are always watching out to avoid being banned.Well, fine, ban me if you like.I probably will be after this posting and no doubt Conservative will cackle with glee at “winning” again.But laugh Conservative, you win nothing.I post this is full knowledge that I might be blocked banned and insulted by you in my absence and I have always remained polite and civil plus I can hold my head up high.Hopefully one of you will take a stand and insist on standards of civility.But I don’t hold out much hope..well...........it would normally be possible but after all SYSOP promotion here has little to do Thanks, many of you were kind, decent people whom I enjoyed working with understanding what the heck and I pray for you are doing. [[User:TmtoulouseMaxFletcher|TmtoulouseMaxFletcher]] 1319:2821, 1 May 2007 5 October 2011 (EDT):: I don't know. No mods seem to be currently active. --<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">Wik</font><font color="#444444" face="Times New Roman">i</font><font color="#666666" face="Times New Roman">nterpreter</font>'''^{[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Wikinterpreter talk?]}

==thank younotification of time of Internal Server Error ==

thank you for fixing At CDT 5:19-5:21 I kept encountering Internal Server Error with instruction to notify webmaster of time it happened and what I had done when it occurred. I had clicked a link from a Conservapedia article to external Bible text, and then could not get back to the Conservapedia article, not even from my talk Favorites list link. When I did get back to the main article, clicking on the particular part of the table of contents in the article to get to where I had been only produced another Internal Server Error. Clicking "back" arrow at top of pageonly produced either the same notification or the main article and the notification when I clicked the table of contents. <br>--[[User:Will N.Dataclarifier|Will N.Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]] 10) 06:3430, 3 22 May 2007 2018 (EDT)