Sorry to spoil that interesting notion, but there are no homosexuals on Conservapedia, and if they were to complain about us, they'd have far more material that this stub of an article. As a matter of fact, every single article on homosexuality in the site is horribly bias, and it's something I plan on fixing. However, I've never heard of an actual 'Gay Bomb' before, and I'd like some more evidence that this really exists, or perhaps it does deserve deletion.
--[[User:YoungConservative|YoungConservative]] 14:39, 4 February 2008 (EST)YoungConservative
This page seems to have been vandalized, but I don't really know how to go about fixing it. Just lettin' y'all know... [[User:Rockthecasbah|Rockthecasbah]] 08:05, 19 March 2008 (EDT)
==parody==
Given the numerous parody around here, does anyone but me think this is a joke? --[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 16:05, 13 November 2008 (EST)
:Nevermind. Even BBC has it. I'm going to edit this to add more references so the people like me, going "huh????" will be able to show, yes, the US government military think tanks really are this stupid once in a Blue moon. Thank gods better heads prevail in our Military!--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 16:09, 13 November 2008 (EST)
::I would move this to a new article on strange or unrealistic weapons. The gay bomb, the pork bomb (a proposal to bomb enemy Muslims with pork fat, the theory being they would drop their weapons immediately and rush to Mecca), the [[Soviet "ape-man"]] all fall into that category. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 16:25, 13 November 2008 (EST)
Wikipedia used to have a page for "bad jokes and other deleted nonsense". This could go there. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 17:06, 13 November 2008 (EST)
Ed, why did you delete this? It is a real bomb, and kinda funny in a "we really thought that?" way. Maybe we can do what Karajou suggests and put it in a section with other "strange but true" articles?--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 17:08, 13 November 2008 (EST) (edit conflict) Cept it's not a joke, it's real.
:There is no evidence that a chemical can turn someone homosexual (or heterosexual). I'll restore if it someone wants to start a [[political humor]] page. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 17:11, 13 November 2008 (EST)
::Didn't Rob Smith create this page? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 17:59, 13 November 2008 (EST)
:::Ed, I'd support reinstating this page too. It's a crazy idea to think about, turning a whole army gay, but it was a legitimately suggested (far-fetched) plan that is in the Pentagon's records. I also am not 100% sure that it's chemically impossible to do. If there are truth serums, why can't there be a gay serum? Not that I'd want it to fall in the wrong hands! -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 03:13, 15 November 2008 (EST)
::::Largely because that implies there is some sort of chemical reason for "gayness", which I don't think has ever been shown. There are chemical inhibitors, and truth serums supress those in order to get the truth out. But I still agree that this article wasn't parody, or at least, it was about a true subject. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 12:48, 15 November 2008 (EST)
:::::I see it's been undeleted! (That's what I get for going through my watchlist in strict order). Joaquín wrote it, so it definitely wasn't started as parody. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 13:02, 15 November 2008 (EST)
::::::Great to see it undeleted. By the way, I agree that no chemical reason for "gayness" has been shown -- if there is one (which I doubt), a discovery is probably way off. However, thinking ''scientifically'' (gasp!), I don't think the evidence has been ruled out that in some high quantities a theoretical serum could cause everyday, respectable people to have temporary, uncontrollable urges. These just may be hypersexualized urges, but if the people are in a single sex situation (such as an army), these urges could be misdirected to the wrong sex. I'm just rambling, but I ''guess'' I can see where the Pentagon people got the idea from. There are unfortunately some very sinister ways of controlling or influencing the brain, and I'd be happier if such a serum never, ever gets created. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 16:02, 15 November 2008 (EST)