Changes

Talk:Essay:A Challenge to Creationists

No change in size, 16:27, June 17, 2008
/* Very well, I will explain why the burden of proof is on creationism. */ fixed typos
::Okay, fair enough, but outside of the story, where the significance of the story lies, there ARE hundreds of stories involving supernatural beings and ONLY those supernatural beings. The point is, since they're all unfalsifiable, they can't be proven false. But since none of the stories can accomodate the others, they can't all be true. So since unfalsifiability is a common trait with all creation stories, you need more. You need to PROVE it to be true. --[[User:JackSmith|JackSmith]] 12:10, 17 June 2008 (EDT)
:::I assume that by falsifiable, you are referring to the five senses. In other words, unless one can taste, feel, smell, see, or otherwise observe with the five senses, that then it cannot be true. Is that correct? If that is what you are saying, we cannot prove the concepts of truth, beauty, love, friendship, or even the concept of knowledge itself. Those concepts are not observable by the five sense, and therefore not falsifiable if I understand you correctly. And yet we recognize them to be true real things. --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 12:25, 17 June 2008 (EDT)