What's the sense of [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Connecticut&curid=8177&diff=568821&oldid=568341 this reversion]? Isn't it better to put the links in reference format? [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 12:45, 25 November 2008 (EST)
:It was already reverted, but you would have been fine to go ahead with the revert. The user seems to revert without rhyme or reason. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 01:09, 26 November 2008 (EST)
Hey for famous people 5 out of 6 is not bad. - jowns
==Reference quality==
A reference on this page (currently #3) points to answers.com, which somehow doesn't seem like a reputable, citable source. can we get something better than this? --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 01:15, 19 April 2016 (EDT)
== Useful article ==
This article might be useful if we decide to expand upon the state's political situation: [https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/416862-did-revisionist-history-help-keep-connecticut-dems-in-power] --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 14:23, 17 November 2018 (EST)