Changes
/* Dating */ Slight change. Circular reasoning sentence wasn't really needed. The whole paragraph reads quite well now.
Flood geologists date the flood to around 2350 B.C., based on [[biblical chronology]].
They argue that uniformitarian dating methods are unreliable, reasoning that the Flood would invalidate some of the presumptions behind uniformitarian dating methods.
On this basis, flood geologists argue that archaeological dates which purport to show civilisations and artifacts being older than the Flood cannot be used to invalidate the date of the flood are incorrect because they are based on the presumption that none of these methods would not be altered by the effects of a global flood in such a way as to render conclusions drawn from them invalid.<ref>For One example, is Carbon Dating which is calibrated according to known background levels of C14 in the atmosphere, but this calibration does not account for likely altered levels due to extensive volcanism during the Flood. See [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/5026/ Carbon dating into the future] (Creation Ministries International).</ref>Concluding that there was no Flood on the basis of dating methods that presume that there was no Flood is circular reasoning.
== Common Criticisms ==
