|Observed that [[Bill O'Reilly]] is not [[conservative]], and cited several key examples.<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bill_O%27Reilly&oldid=37999</ref>
|[[Liberal media]] continued to pretend that O'Reilly is somehow a leader of the [[conservative movement]].
|O'Reilly endorses the [[liberal]]s' amnesty bill for illegal immigration. (Ultimately he was fired for personal misconduct.)
|June 20, 2013
|-
|May 7, 2007
|The speed of light varies.<ref>A [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Quantifying_Openmindedness&oldid=147388</ref>|Physicists point out that the [[Theory of Relativityquiz]] and [[Isaac Newton|Newtonian]] physics both demonstrate Suggests that willingness to consider that the speed of light varies depending on has been different in the medium through which it is travelingpast could be used as a measure of openmindedness.|"So it turns out While the speed of light might not be constant after allquiz takes no position on this question, there are articles in scientific magazines exploring this issue and suggesting that it may very well have been different as recently as 2 billion years ago." <ref>https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6092-speed-of-light-may-have-changed-recently</ref>|While there are scientists that are curious about evidence (such as the Oklo "reactor") that the speed of light, or the fine-structure constant, has changed, the scientific community generally accepts that it has not changed significantly, if at all. Not because relativity requires it, but because conservation of energy and of momentum require it.|An article "Einsteinian error: The 25-year-old supernova that could change the speed of light forever."<ref>http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/184879-einsteinian-error-the-25-year-old-supernova-that-could-change-the-speed-of-light-forever</ref> Research shows that due appears on the internet. It is not about an actual change to the impossibility speed of light, but to a perfect vacuum change in the idealized concept of 'way the "speed of light in a vacuum" is perceived. It turns out that light doesn' cannot be achieved t actually travel at that speed; it's slower by about 1 part in practice300 million due to vacuum polarization. See <ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/Speed_of_light#Does_light_travel_at_the_.22speed_of_light.22.3F</ref>, <ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/Speed_of_light#Has_the_speed_of_light_changed_through_the_history_of_the_universe.3F</ref> and <ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/C_decay</ref>
|March 25, 2013
|-
|World economy continues to skate on thin ice and the Eurozone is experiencing significant economic problems.
|-
|November 28, 2009<ref>http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Relativity&oldid=724599</ref>|Conservapedia asserts that the [[Theory of relativity]] is false, and creates the page [[Counterexamples to Relativity]], initially containing 10 counterexamplesthat include [[quantum entanglement]]. <ref>http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Relativity&oldid=724599</ref> It slowly The list of counterexamples grows to a few dozen50 over the next decade. Quantum entanglement now appears in items 6 and 21.|Widespread ridicule by [[liberal]]s across the internet.<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/Community_Portal/Archive_1#Two_millionth_page_view_for_the_.22Counterexamples_to_Relativity.22_page In a Google search, at least 97% of the articles were derisive</ref>|The page "Biggest Test Yet" shows that Einstein was wrong in his opposition to strict "Copenhagen" quantum mechanics. The test was about [[Essay:Rebuttal to Counterexamples to Relativityaction-at-a-distance]] attempts to refute all of them([[quantum entanglement]])<ref>https://www.livescience.com/62523-physicists-crowdsource-a-reality-check.html LiveScience news article</ref>|Widespread ridicule all across the internet<ref>http://www. conservapedia.com/Action_at_a_distance</ref> Anyone questioning this theory would be It was not about relativity. Yet, perhaps because of [[liberal bias]], anyone who questions relativity is unlikely to get employment as a high school science teacherteaching job, much less a PhD or college faculty position.|By mid-2016 the number of counterexamples has grown to 49.<ref>The [[Essay:Rebuttal to Counterexamples to Relativity|rebuttal page]] keeps pace.</ref>|July 12May 9, 20162018
|-
|January 14, 2010
|-
|October 14, 2010
|Conservapedia observes and predicts increased premature graying , in Cal Ripken, Anderson Cooper, and Taylor Hicks for example, as a [[Counterexample to an Old Earth]].<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_an_Old_Earth&oldid=822877</ref>|[[Liberal denial]] that one can draw geological or cosmological conclusions from a few people's gray hair. Whether premature graying is increasingactually on the increase is not known.
|A top actress—Katie Holmes, the wife of Tom Cruise—is observed having gray hairs at only age 33.
|April 29, 2012
|"Despite wasting millions of taxpayer dollars searching for gravity waves predicted by the theory, none have ever been found."<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Relativity&oldid=852797</ref> This was actually true at the time, but the implication was that gravitational waves would ''never'' be found.
|The (perhaps overzealous) researchers at the "BICEP2" project claimed to have discovered evidence of gravitational waves from the "[[big bang]]".<ref>http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.3985v1</ref> This was shot down in 2015: "Gravitational waves discovery now officially dead."<ref>http://www.nature.com/news/gravitational-waves-discovery-now-officially-dead-1.16830</ref> But in 2015 and 2016, gravitational waves from colliding [[black hole]]s were irrefutably detected by the [[LIGO]] instruments. See [[Gravitational waves]].
|Confirmed.<ref>http://journals.aps.org/prl/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102</ref><ref>http://www.ligo.org/news/pressreleases.php</ref><ref>http://journals.aps.org/prl/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102</ref><ref>https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/image/ligo20160211a</ref><ref>https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/video/ligo20160211v2</ref><ref>[http://www.nbcnews.com/science/science-news/gravitational-waves-ripples-space-time-detected-first-time-n516566</ref><ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEPIwEJmZyE</ref><ref>http://www.nbcnews.com/science/science-news/it-wasn-t-fluke-scientists-see-black-holes-collide-again-n593156</ref><ref>http://www.cbsnews.com/news/scientists-detect-second-gravitational-wave-einstein-predicted/</ref><ref>https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/news/ligo20160615</ref><ref>https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/video/ligo20160615v2</ref><ref>https://phys.org/news/2017-06-gravitational-insight-black-holes.html</ref><ref>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-36472434#sa-ns_mchannel=rss&ns_source=PublicRSS20-sa</ref>
|January 21, 2016
|-
|September 3, 2011
|Large earthquakes are increasing in frequency.<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_an_Old_Earth&oldid=909160</ref>
|[[Liberal denial]] becaues this would suggest that [[atheist]]ic claims of a stable [[Old Earth]] are untrue.
|<span id="Sept. 3, 2011"></span>"A remarkable increase in the rate of (magnitude 3) and greater earthquakes is currently in progress," according to a presentation at the Seismological Society of America.<ref>http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/17/us-earthquakes-usa-idUSBRE83G1FL20120417</ref>
|August 13, 2012
|''Conservapedia'' observes that nations which adopt [[same-sex marriage]] then decline in competitiveness at the Olympics.<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=2012_Summer_Olympics&oldid=1000056</ref>
|[[Liberal denial]]
|Germany, which rejects [[same-sex marriage]], wins the [[World Cup]] without losing a single game, including a record-breaking 7-1 rout of Brazil 7-1 in the semifinals.
|July 13, 2014
|September 6, 2012
|''Conservapedia'' added [[God]]-denier [[Lance Armstrong]] to our list of [[Overrated Sports Stars]] <ref>http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Overrated_Sports_Stars&oldid=1004539</ref>
|[[Liberal denial]] continued about Armstrong, insisting that he be removed from this entry because Armstrong continued to deny the obvious;<ref>[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Overrated_Sports_Stars&diff=prev&oldid=1004539]</ref> the liberal Olympic bureaucrats refused for months to strip Armstrong of his medal, until after Armstrong admitted his doping.
|Finally and pathetically Armstrong admitted what he had so aggressively denied about doping.
|January 14, 2013
|January 24, 2014
|-
| February January 3, 2013|''Conservapedia'' observed that extended 35-minute blackout at the [[Super Bowl]] was likely caused in part by the energy rationing mindset of liberals.<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Main_Page&diff=1055150Fidel_Castro&oldid=10329621026721</ref>|It was [[Fidel Castro]] died in 2006 with a faulty relay, the terminal illness in a Cuban hospital. The [[lamestream mediaObama Administration]] knew this and local authorities claimedBarack Obama did not visit or even mention Fidel Castro during Obama's visit to Cuba in March 2016. Photos of stand-ins for Fidel Castro were the wrong height, and had him wearing thick scarves on hot days to hide the stand-in's younger neck and lack of wrinkles.|It Tepid liberal denial because the truth was not obvious.|Officials announce that Castro is dead on the eve of a faulty relay government mandatory briefing of President- relays almost never fail in such a mannerElect Donald Trump, as confirmed by an expert quoted by ''National Geographic'who would have exposed the lie to the public. Thousands of Marxist liberals then mourn the surprise "death" of one of the 20th century's greatest monsters.|February 9November 25, 20132016
|-
|January 8, 2013
|"The liberal media go along with the communist cover-up about [[Hugo Chavez]], despite how he likely died in a Cuban hospital in December."<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&oldid=1028225</ref>|Repeated insistence that reports in the [[lamestream media]] that Chavez was alive from December to March, including even a photo purporting to be him, must be true.
|Hugo Chávez is indeed dead, but the [[BBC]] claims he died nearly two months after Conservapedia had already informed the world of that fact.<ref>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-21679053</ref> It is reported that Chavez's decomposition is too advanced for embalming. Proving he died much earlier than reported.<ref>[http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/13/us-venezuela-chavez-embalming-idUSBRE92C1GC20130313 Venezuela may be unable to embalm Chavez's remains]</ref>
|March 5, 2013
|-
| February 3, 2013
|''Conservapedia'' observed that extended 35-minute blackout at the [[Super Bowl]] was likely caused in part by the energy rationing mindset of liberals.<ref>http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Main_Page&diff=1055150&oldid=1032962</ref>
|It was a faulty relay, the lamestream media and local authorities claimed.
|It was not a faulty relay - relays almost never fail in such a manner, as confirmed by an expert quoted by ''National Geographic''.
|February 9, 2013
|-
|April 23, 2013
|"Tamerlan Tsarnaev probably murdered his friend on a 9/11 anniversary, and DNA likely proves it."<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Main_Page&oldid=1048618</ref>
|Even though the DNA match is quick and known to the Obama Administration, even though there will be no trial of Tamerlan, and even though closure on the 9/11-anniversary murders would comfort families of the victims, liberals want the DNA match to continue to be withheld from the families and the public.
|More than two weeks later (and nearly three months later for the ''[[New York Times]]''), stories began to appear in the [[lamestream media]] that forensic evidence and cell phone records confirm the likely involvement of Tamerlan Tsarnaev in committing the gruesome murders.
|May 11, 2013 ([[mainstream media]] outside of [[New York Times]])
<br>July 10, 2013 ([[New York Times]])
|July 27, 2013
|Predicting liberal negativity, as required by the [[homosexual agenda]], towards the [[Winter Olympics]] because it was being hosted by pro-heterosexual Russia.<ref>http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Winter_Olympics&oldid=1062259</ref>
|[[Liberal denial]]
|Russia was spectacular in successfully hosting the Olympics and winning the medals race, and several articles afterward were critical of the media and others in how they criticized Russia.<ref>http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/olympics/bondy-putin-games-worth-weight-gold-article-1.1699246</ref>
|February 23, 2014
|-
|February 18, 2016
|Conservapedia predicts that [[Barack Obama]] will not meet with "[[Fidel Castro]]" during Obama's visit to [[Cuba]], despite how a "Fidel" has met with other leading foreign dignitaries after the severely ill Fidel checked into and probably died in a Cuban hospital in 2006.|[[Liberal denial]] persists about the obvious [[communist]] hoax in pretending that Fidel Castro recovered and voluntarily gave up power in 2006.
|The [[liberal media]] announce that Obama will not meet with [[Fidel Castro]] during Obama's multi-day visit there, yet the liberal media does not point out that the obvious reason is to avoid humiliation to Obama for meeting with a fake Fidel.
|March 20, 2016
|August 17, 2016
|''Conservapedia'' criticized the [[liberal media]] and one of its favored athletes, Ryan Lochte, for telling and promoting a false tale of armed robbery near the [[2016 Summer Olympics]],<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&oldid=1271150</ref> which smeared the gracious hosts.
|[[Liberal denial]] continued to downplay or refuse to admit the falsehood.
|The truth came out, but liberal denial persisted and some continued to defend Ryan Lochte.
|August 19, 2016
|-
|October 21, 2016
|''Conservapedia'' observed that three effects will boost [[Donald Trump]] above his poll numbers in the election:
*Brexit effect - 5 point error by polls due to media bias causing people be afraid to be candid with pollsters
*Arnold Schwarzenegger/Reagan effect - 8-10 points better than polling,[68] due to media bias and also advantage enjoyed by Republican entertainers
*Scott Brown effect - many points due to much greater enthusiasm<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&oldid=1284862</ref>
|sarcastic criticism and [[liberal denial]]
|Donald Trump exceeded the polling by about four points, and won an election that [[liberal]] experts predicted with great confidence that he would lose.
|November 8, 2016
|-
|November 7, 2016
|''Conservapedia'' observed that the second letter by [[James Comey ]] to exonerate [[Hillary Clinton]] was actually helpful to [[Donald Trump]], because it fed the backlash among the [[grassroots]] at the preferential treatment given to Hillary.<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&oldid=1288160</ref>
|[[Free trade]]rs at the ''Wall Street Journal'' falsely assert that the letter helps Hillary.
|In the post-election analysis, [[Hillary]]'s campaign confirmed that the letter hurt her even though it purportedly exonerated her.<ref>Fears, Danika (November 11, 2016). [http://nypost.com/2016/11/11/team-clinton-blames-james-comey-for-tuesday-night-massacre/?utm_source=zergnet.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=zergnet_1293073 Clinton aide’s bizarre explanation for Hillary’s humiliating loss]. ''The New York Post''. Retrieved November 16, 2016.</ref><ref>Chozick, Amy (November 12, 2016). [http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/13/us/politics/hillary-clinton-james-comey.html?_r=0 Hillary Clinton Blames F.B.I. Director for Election Loss]. ''The New York Times''. Retrieved November 16, 2016.</ref>
|November 16, 2016
|-
|January 3March 21, 20132017|Supreme Court nominee [[Neil Gorsuch]] is not a strong [[conservative]] as pretended by his cheerleaders.<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fidel_CastroNeil_Gorsuch&diff=1323361&oldid=102672113a06396</ref>|A torrent of opposition to this criticism of Gorsuch, mostly by [[Fidel CastroD.C.]] died in 2006 with a terminal illness in a Cuban hospital. The -based, faux [[Obama Administrationconservative]] knew this and groups.|Barely a year later, Gorsuch then provided the swing vote by joining with four [[Barack Obamaliberal]] did not visit or even mention Fidel Castro during Obama's visit Justices to Cuba in March 2016block deportations by [[Trump]],<ref>https://www. Photos of standpolitico.com/story/2018/04/17/immigration-ins for Fidel Castro were the wrong height, and had him wearing thick scarves on hot days to hide the standruling-in's younger neck gorsuch-528749</ref> and lack an analysis of wrinkles.|Tepid Gorsuch's voting record in his first full Term revealed that he was more [[liberal denial]] because the truth was obvious.|Officials announce that Castro is dead on the eve of a government mandatory briefing of President-Elect than even Justice [[Donald TrumpAnthony Kennedy]], who would have exposed the lie to the public. Thousands of Marxist liberals then mourn the surprise "death" of one of the 20th century's greatest monsters<ref>https://reason.com/blog/2018/06/27/neil-gorsuch-was-more-liberal-than-antho</ref>|November 25April 17, 2018, and June 28, 20162018
|-
|March 31, 2017<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&oldid=1327433</ref>|[[Dems]] will attain the 41 votes necessary to successfully [[filibuster]] the confirmation of stealth candidate [[Neil Gorsuch]] to the [[U.S. Supreme Court]].<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&oldid=1327433</ref>
|[[RINO]]s and much of the [[liberal media]] doubted that the Dems would attain the 41 votes needed for a successful filibuster.
|Dems announce they have the 41 votes to block the [[pro-choiceabortion]] nominee.
|April 3, 2017
|-
|Trump pardoned Sheriff Joe Arpaio three days later.
|Aug. 25, 2017
|-
|July 8, 2018
|Conservapedia predicts that [[Brett Kavanaugh]] will be nominated to the [[U.S. Supreme Court|Supreme Court]] by [[Trump]].<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&oldid=1432359</ref>
|Judge [[Andrew Napolitano]] said the next day on [[Fox News Channel|Fox News]] that Kavanaugh had been eliminated from consideration.
|Trump nominates Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court just as we predicted.
|July 9, 2018
|}