Talk:Censorability
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Openwideformywoodtk (talk | contribs) at 02:00, May 28, 2010. It may differ significantly from current revision.
andy, could we have some sources??? --Johnb 19:04, 27 May 2010 (EDT)
- John, censorability is as logical a concept as the idea that 2+2=4. I suppose you also require "sources" for such logical truths as the positive effects of school prayer and of reading the Bible. Open your mind. EdwardS 19:14, 27 May 2010 (EDT)
- Right. What's next, demanding a source for an arithmetic calculation?--Andy Schlafly 21:02, 27 May 2010 (EDT)
- so, you're refusing to simply cite a source, which I "requested". My mind is open, i just wanted this page to adhere to the Conservapedia Commandments. also, some cites with maths would be nice, because it would give the population links to further information. --Johnb 21:22, 27 May 2010 (EDT)
- "Everything you post must be true and verifiable," requires the Conservapedia Commandments. Original insights can qualify. Unlike Wikipedia, Conservapedia welcomes original, logical entries. Conservapedia advances knowledge rather than merely regurgitating and distorting it as liberal sources do.--Andy Schlafly 21:34, 27 May 2010 (EDT)
idiots
you are all morons.. wow