Conservapedia talk:Panel

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JC (talk | contribs) at 13:03, March 30, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Jump to navigation Jump to search

That hardly sounds like a panel of objective experts...Palmd001 16:22, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

Is it supposed to be? --Huey gunna getcha 16:24, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

I have SERIOUS issues with the "anonymous members" bit. Members in this position should HAVE to be marked as such. --Sid 3050 16:29, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

OOO, OOO, can I be a member? I'll be ever so good! I promise I won't let my high school studies, lack of life experience or religious brain washing get in the way of making good fair decisions! Pwetty Please? MatteeNeutra 16:32, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

It has already been set up as anonymous and it is unlikely to change. CPWebmaster 16:34, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

So, a few anonymous Panel members could push their own point of view, and once it gets pushed back towards whatever passes as "neutrality" here, the Panel members could declare that this is a major conflict and should be handled... by the Panel. And nobody would of the conflict of interest. How convenient! --Sid 3050 16:45, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
how do we know a panel even exists! This looks serious bent, like a banana republic wiki! --Cgday 18:12, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
Sunlight is the best disinfectant. Myk 18:19, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

"We do not censor in any way"

It is a shame that many of your editors do not agree with that policy, see http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Soccer&diff=56791&oldid=48604 for one incidence of very silly deletion. If you truly did not censor you would not keep closing the facility to create accounts.

Well, to be fair, we are not allowed to copy from Wikipedia because (1) we do not follow the GFDL and (2) Andy made it a rule.
However, there is censoring going on. Look at Conservative's edits that removed entire sections (with cites) simply because he didn't want his little propaganda piece to be cluttered with silly things like science. Or heck, look at some of the locked articles and their histories in general. --Sid 3050 19:02, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
How do we know that these panel members are up to date on the "major conflicts" they recieve? Do they actively edit here and follow the ongoing debates? What's to stop them from becoming another user:conservative or user:scorpion? And they should definitely not be anonymous. It's easy to hide behind anonymimity (sp, too lazy to look it up for real), but it takes a real man (or woman) to stand up and declare "I did it." Jrssr5 19:39, 26 March 2007 (EDT)


Rob PommerTALK is NOT a member of The Panel and no-one should contact Rob PommerTALK on his talk page or via email regarding ANY decisions that may come up for review by The Panel. Besides, bribery is unethical. Rob PommerTALK 18:30, 28 March 2007 (EDT)

I think having the homeschoolers form the panel is a wonderful idea. Harken the words of our Lord and savior himself:
"But Jesus said, Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven." (Matthew 19:14)
"Let the children first be filled: for it is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it unto the dogs." (Mark 7:27)
JC 09:03, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_talk:Panel&oldid=74672"