Template talk:Stub2

Any chance someone can make the text on this a bit bigger. I can barely read it. Sulgran 19:55, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

I think we should just stick with Template:Stub. There is nothing wrong with it. This template here just tries to hide the fact that there is a glaring problem with the article by blending in with the main text, thus creating the illusion of more content. --Sid 3050 22:09, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

Well, didn't know about the fact that the even WAS a second template until I was yelled at for using the first one too much, but I personally feel the same way. However, I'll use whichever is more agreed upon.--Elamdri 22:11, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

I think that Stub2 is much better... It's less intrusive and on pages where there is a single line of content, it doesn't make sense for the stub warning to be three times larger than the article. GofG _|^|_| Talk 20:08, 25 March 2007 (EDT)