Talk:Garden of Eden
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by The Haunted Angel (talk | contribs) at 16:04, March 22, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Article very short
The article, in my opinion, needs a great deal of meat! I suggest laying it out in this fashion:
- The Biblical account of Eden
- any extra-Biblical account of Eden
- The physical description of Eden
- the conclusions of David Rohl, who matched Eden's physical description with a site in northwest Iran.
Karajou 03:58, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
...Or too much?
Whilst I agree that the article needs expanding, the material about the descendants of Adam and Eve belongs in a different article. Philip J. Rayment 10:55, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
...although it would still be considered incest
What does this phrase (that was removed from the article) mean?
- That it was still immoral? No, that's already been answered in the article.
- That it still involves sex between closely-related people? That's already been said.
- That it still involves someone forcing their affections on someone else (as a father on a daughter)? No, that's not what incest actually means (although it frequently has that connotation), and that is not the situation here.
So I see no reason for that phrase being in there.
I'm not happy about the reference to intercourse with Eve (besides, why not a daughter with Adam?), as that would be adultery, but between married brother and sister it would have been okay at the time.
Philip J. Rayment 09:37, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
- The action is still considered incest. True, it is still stated that it isn't immoral, but it is undeniable that it is incest. If the theory that they had sex with their mother is true, then it is incest, whether the phrase looks nice or not. The Haunted Angel 12:04, 22 March 2007 (EDT)