Talk:Natural disaster

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by What (talk | contribs) at 15:33, March 21, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Jump to navigation Jump to search

WOW. Um, I know we got a bias an all, but I think this is a bit much. I don't think God slings tornadoes around when he gets peeved.--Elamdri 11:26, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

Not sure how you could know that, but okay. If everything is from God, how can it be a "Natural" disaster. As a young Christian, taking the language back is very important to me. Flippin 11:29, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
Glad that you agree. Christian language is important.--Sherman 11:31, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
Christian language is important, but understanding actual scientific causation is probably more important to your ultimate educational goals :-/ -AmesG 11:32, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

If God exists, wouldn't it be God's work that defines natural? Wouldn't everything God does be natural? What

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Natural_disaster&oldid=54416"