User talk:DeanS

GET STUFFED!!

Seriously, just get stuffed. We Wikipedians do not want you here on account of your foul slimy mouth polluting the minds of other people. You keep stating that you are concerned about the quality of modern historical and scientific research, yet you do not seem interested in upholding values essential to legitimate research in any field. You have said enough that your further rants are easily recognised. Therefore, get stuffed.

Long live liberalism!!

Barnstar

200px		The Monkey's Barnstar
		For making Conservapedia your entire life even though your brain is smaller than this monkey's. Here's a banana. Just face the truth: you can't escape it!! Schlafly values are those values practised and preached by Andrew Schlafly, especially at Conservapedia. Many of these values ultimately work against the aims and goals of Conservapedia. Some of these values are as follows: Biblical literalism, often putting Old Testament writings ahead of the actual teachings of Jesus A Young Earth Creationism viewpoint Anti-homosexual Anti-abortion Anti-sex-education in schools Pro-capital punishment Global warming denialism Anti-environmental controls Anti-Islam Pro-Israel Anti-liberal Anti-government Anti-public school Anti-intellectual Anti-universal health care Anti-gun control Anti-Medicare Anti-vaccination Pro-baby shaking Anti-minimum wage Anti-left wing economics Pro-neoliberalism and laissez faire Pro-homeschooling (religious) Anti-United Nations Anti-European Anti-Canadian Anti-Democratic Party Anti-Independent Party Anti-Green Party Anti-Socialism Anti-relativity - both in the moral sense and in terms of physics Because Schlafly values are harmful to the intellect in the long-term, many organisations have warned of the dangers of relying on Conservapedia for factual information. The Royal Society of Britain has warned the public in relation to Conservapedia: "People need to be very careful where they get their information from." Schlafly values are believed to have also played a part in Andrew Schlafly's absurd and time-wasting decision to report users who were suspected of vandalizing Conservapedia to the FBI. References