Talk:Moral relativism

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ilfirin (talk | contribs) at 22:29, July 21, 2008. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Jump to navigation Jump to search

No sources were found to support the last point made, so I deleted it. Additionally, moral relativism has been used for far more than just Atheists, Communists, and Nazis (although I do find it humorous that atheists are lumped in there).

It has been linked...

“ It has been linked to atheism and to Communist and Nazi ideology. ”

Erm... yeeeees? How has it been linked to it? Who linked it? Is the link valid? This is a horrible way to end the article, and I wouldn't even know where to begin to look for sources. Could either Miss Cleo or whoever put these claims into the article help me out here? I'll try to look for material myself, of course, but I guess that those who made the claims would more readily know where to look (and what to look for). --DHayes 18:23, 12 March 2008 (EDT)

How are sexual relations between relatives closely linked to homosexuality? That may not be what is said, but the link goes to homosexuality, implying the connection. Is not heterosexuality just as linked to sexual relations between relatives as homosexuality is? Tell me if I'm wrong. Rockthecasbah 21:41, 19 May 2008 (EDT)

Neither Nazis nor slave owners were moral relativists. They both, or at least most members of both, were moral absolutists; they believed that their morals were right and everyone else's were wrong. BlinkadyblinkRAGE 22:49, 21 May 2008 (EDT)

What about moral relativism in bible and conservative american behaviour? In the ten commandments it is clearly said "Thou shalt not kill" and yet although killing is marked as evil by the bible itself, many conservatives are in favor of the death penalty and although I'm not an expert on the subject of bible, I recall there being a line about "eye for an eye". This makes no sense to me, so please, explain these things for me. If killing is wrong in the first place, why should the punishment be death. I mean, shouldn't then the executioner be killed too? That's some moral relativism for ya.