Talk:Physics

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ymmotrojam (talk | contribs) at 01:23, March 19, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Physics is the study of nature, and is the science of studying the laws of God's universe

God in this context is completely irrelevant. If this is the case, we should also have God's Ball, God's incline,God's Scientists, God's Galileo. Having "the" instead of "God's" universe is less biased (aren't we trying to reduce bias). --Sm355 21:11, 18 March 2007 (EDT)

No, it's implied through the rest of the article. It's not irrelevant because God created it, He deserves the the credit. We are privileged to be able to study and figure out different aspects of His creation. That's what science is, the study of God's creation. --Ymmotrojam 21:14, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
Sigh. It is still not proven that God did create the Universe (The Bible does not count as proof). Its just as likely and provable that Xenu, Min, Ra, Thor, Mars, Vishnu or any other God you would care to think of created the Universe. So in an article about rocks for example, should we include the statement "God's Rocks" at the start of the article.--Sm355 21:20, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
Even if they did, this is a Christian site, so one wouldn't put those anyways. --Ymmotrojam 21:23, 18 March 2007 (EDT)