Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass'n v. DeBenedictis
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by FernoKlump (talk | contribs) at 03:29, May 3, 2008. It may differ significantly from current revision.
In Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass'n v. DeBenedictis, 480 U.S. 470 (1987), the U.S. Supreme Court held that that a regulation banning certain uses of a portion of an owner's property does not require compensation under the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause.