User talk:DanH

Archives:

User talk:MountainDew

User talk:DanHarchive1

Vandalism

Dan,

Thanks for all your help dealing with this latest vandal. Rather than deleting all the pages he creates, I have been replacing them with content or redirecting them, and then protecting them. Eventually, we can hope he will run out of inventive names for Satan! ~ Sharon ^Talk 16:38, 11 May 2007 (EDT)

deletedpage

when pages need to be deleted and protected, just protect it and replace the content with #REDIRECT [[deletedpage]]. that way it doesn't show up on searches. --Tim (CPAdmin1)^talk 12:24, 14 May 2007 (EDT)

Please take a look at this edit

You might want to have a look at this edit, and the associated photo that was uploaded to make the edit possible. I've already left a message with the user responsible for the photo and edit, but am not sure if it is revertable. HeartOfGold 18:41, 14 May 2007 (EDT)

Allegation of Racism

I fail to see how my comments on Sikhs are racist. Islam and Sikhism do not describe races they describe religion. Both are wrong in my opinion are to be condemed

Thank you indeed

It has been an honor. Thank you indeed.

--User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 19:42, 16 May 2007 (EDT)

Deceit Entry

Dan, please accept my apologies on the Ward Churchill edit to the deceit entry. I was confused about who he is. Feel free to reinsert something, with support like this: [1] --Aschlafly 22:08, 16 May 2007 (EDT) No need to apologize. I just figured that this instance was not quite conducive to the direct you had intended for this article. I'll re-add it a little later this evening. DanH 23:29, 16 May 2007 (EDT)

Hovind

May I ask why you removed "controversial". Given that many other YECs also have issues with him, calling him controversial seems fair. JoshuaZ 12:59, 17 May 2007 (EDT)

I've come under attack for my edits on this article (there was even a call for me to be blocked from the site, though it's not on any CP talk pages) and I was trying to "balance" the article somehow. DanH 13:02, 17 May 2007 (EDT)

notice

please read this: New Sysops Training Page

Conservative 21:22, 17 May 2007 (EDT)

Hello!

First of all, thanks for the greeting. This project is very interessting. I'm trying to build up a counter-Wikipedia in german language. The situation of the german Wikipedia is really dire. If you are dissapoited by the english language Wikipeda, take a closer look at the german one. There are not liberals (left) dominating, there are partly well known left-wing extremists (communists, socialists) serving as administrators. It's bad. --Deutscher 16:43, 18 May 2007 (EDT)

Trashbat

Dan - I've no idea if Trashbat is blocked or otherwise in disgrace but the crude sexual reference you removed from Leeds was not posted by him but by Tony Drago. FYI. BrianCo 14:44, 20 May 2007 (EDT)

I stand corrected. Well spotted. Tony Drago must have been a sock. BrianCo 14:49, 20 May 2007 (EDT)

• I don't see Dan online, however I did see: 10:13, 20 May 2007 DanH blocked "Trashbat" with an expiry time of infinite ("dogging" reference to Leeds) So the two users being blocked are different instances. The other user's block isn't infinte. ;-) --Sysop-TK _/MyTalk 14:51, 20 May 2007 (EDT)

TK The "dogging" reference was put in twice but I only noticed the second edit which was done by Tony Drago. I thought that Trashbat was being unfairly blocked instead of Tony Drago but Dan pointed out that Trashbat had made the orginal edit a lot earlier, so it was fair after all. BrianCo 03:20, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

Siege mentality

Thanks for moving that. I was trying to do it myself with a name change and redirect but being a sysop has its advantages I guess. BrianCo 03:15, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

Contaception

Dan, can you move this to its proper title with an R in it. BrianCo 03:26, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

Orthohombic

OK here's another one with a missing R - it should be orthorhombic. BrianCo 03:38, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

think i made a mistake

Got your message. I unblocked him I think before i got your message. Please make sure I did the unblocking right as i am not too techie here. Conservative 22:58, 22 May 2007 (EDT)

Question

I notice that some sysops protect images. Do you want me to do that to?Богдан ^Talk 15:16, 25 May 2007 (EDT)

Article Creations

Your welcome Dan. I enjoy contributing to this site. Crocoite ^{Talk Support my RfA)} 22:44, 25 May 2007 (EDT)

!

I wanted to undo the Joshua article! Your to fast.Богдан ^Talk 23:44, 25 May 2007 (EDT)

Thanks

Thanks for your kind welcome. I am glad to be here. I hope I can make a positive contribution. --ErnstR 00:06, 26 May 2007 (EDT)

Thanks

Thanks for protecting Joshua. Recently I have become more aware of the responsibility that we have to avoid efforts at sensationalism or inappropriate edits. I found one of our articles in an internet search engine, the first one I have seen. It was listed under atheism. There, proudly, is the link to conservapedia. What is the first line of text in the search engine for all to see what conservapedia says? George Bush states that he doesn't believe atheists should be U.S. citizens... This is what is presented as conservapedia? When we allow through junk, we sully the reputation of the site... Thanks again... Learn together 03:25, 26 May 2007 (EDT)

Thanks! (sorry not to have anything different from the above 2)

It's good to be back! Oh, and check out my shiny new hellenised sig!--ύικι ντερπρετηρ ^talk?

Tiny typo

Hi, hope you don't mind but I am really really picky about punctuation. I'm not proud of the fact, I just can't help it! In the Bible article, in the King James section, second paragraph, second sentence, it says "it's vocabulary", which should be "its vocabulary". "It's" is only ever a contraction of "It is". I wouldn't say anything but I just know there are people like me out there who will see that mistake, roll their eyes, and jump to conclusions (unfairly) about the quality of the article. Ferret 19:09, 26 May 2007 (EDT)

• And then I went and wrote "tint typo" as the description. That's justice. Ferret 19:10, 26 May 2007 (EDT)

Chrono Trigger

This was a well known video game in the mid 90s. It is definetly noteworthy. Wikipedia and Uncyclopedia both have articles on it.

Answers in Creation

So do I get brownie points for creating this one Dan? ;-) Learn together 16:05, 29 May 2007 (EDT)

You definitely do from me, but probably not from the majority of the sysops. LOL just kidding DanH 16:12, 29 May 2007 (EDT)

Hi Dan, I'm trying for sysop now to join you 'elect' guys. I know you've put a 'good job' on my page before so I thought I'd ask what you think of my overall contribution to conservapedia. If you're pleased with my work, I hope you'll drop by and add some comments. Thanks ;-) Learn together 17:25, 30 May 2007 (EDT)

Weimar republic

Why did you remove the stub? It is more than appropriate for this article. User:Order

Protection

Hi Dan,

We may be at the point where it would be wise to protect Satan (again) and Hell. I know Satan was opened again to merge in Luficer, but that's been taken care of. Thanks! Learn together 15:05, 30 May 2007 (EDT)

Lions Den

Dan with a name like yours was it wise to enter the Lion's Den? :-) DollarsAndSense 16:38, 30 May 2007 (EDT)

Cumbernauld

DanH I see you reverted my reversion of this entry. Channel 4, is an incredibly controversial channel in the UK often broadcating sensationalist programs. It's main output is a program called Big Brother where members of the public are locked in a house together in order to be voted out by the public. Even this is fixed as the most sensational members are reinstated to boost viewing figures. It has featured coed type nude jacuzzi scenes and even live sexual acts. It also gave a prime-time slot to Richard Dawkins to attack religious belief. I would not take seriously any reference to programming from this source. Alban 17:58, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

Follow the link - [2] Or would you prefer a BBC link? Try [3] I have no idea why you have suddenly appeared to defend reversion of my corrections of previous deliberately inserted inaccuracies and falsehoods, but I stand by my edits and the links above refute your opinion. File:User Fox.png Fox (talk|contribs) 18:02, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

Your BBC link actually refers to a protest by the local council against this slur. Alban 18:06, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

A slur that has seen the town 3 times voted a "carbuncle" etc. Regardless of the news source, the national opinions remain the same. Attacking the edit by claiming it is a liberalist, pornographers' conspiracy is just peurile. File:User Fox.png Fox (talk|contribs) 18:09, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

If your are going to engage in ad hominem attacks and name calling then I will not continue this discussion. It is not appropriate language for Conservapedia. Dafydd 18:15, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

The word "peurile" is directed at the action, not the person. And did you forget which sock you were supposed to be using? I thought you were User:Alban...? Sock-puppetry is also a peurile action. File:User Fox.png Fox (talk|contribs) 18:20, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

Thank you for your support Dafydd but as a native Scot I think I know what I'm talking about. Cumbernauld is not a monstrous carbuncle and deserves better than being derided by a sensationalist sassenach TV station. Alban 18:18, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

Oops! Got the correct puppet on now XD File:User Fox.png Fox (talk|contribs) 18:20, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

Oh yes, very funny. Accuse me of socking. Just because someone else objects to your abusive language. If you want to continue this discussion further then I suggest you move it to one of our talk pages rather than cluttering up a sysops page. Alban 18:32, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

Please refer back to your other talk page to see confirmation that you were busted via IP address. Nice try. File:User Fox.png Fox (talk|contribs) 18:37, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

Thanks

Thanks Dan. I appreciate your support. Crocoite ^Talk 23:29, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

Why was my edit reverted?

What's wrong? I'm trying to improve the baraminology article by explaining what the types of people under the Human Holobaramin are. It's what's in the Bible. BillJones 02:02, 1 June 2007 (EDT)

The Mongoloid entry was totally racist. For one. --Sysop-TK _/MyTalk 02:26, 1 June 2007 (EDT)

Your granny

I mean, your grammar: [4] Nice fix! :-) --Ed Poor ^Talk 22:30, 1 June 2007 (EDT)

Thank you. My Grandmother would expect nothing less. DanH 22:31, 1 June 2007 (EDT)

South Africa

Dan, there's a lot on this site I disagree with. So be it. But I am glad to see that people here find all those racist bits on South Africa as loathsome as I do. Thanks for nuking all those entries by a guy who seems to be longing for the days of Pik Botha. Sevenstring 23:15, 1 June 2007 (EDT)

Hey, how about an unblock of the SA article? There's more to write. Maestro 10:42, 12 July 2007 (EDT)

Capitals

Thanks for the info. I did search under several titles for US Capitals, etc. but no pages came up. Should I ask a sysop to delete my page, or is that unnecessary? DeborahB. 15:20, 4 June 2007 (EDT)

I think your page looks good, and better than the other one. Maybe if all the links got fixed that would be best. DanH 15:23, 4 June 2007 (EDT)

blocking

Hey how can you find the IP for the user, I dont think I have the checkuser button. lol Sorry I might sound dumb.--Will N. 16:19, 5 June 2007 (EDT)

I sent the instructions to you through Conservapedia email. DanH 16:21, 5 June 2007 (EDT)

I heard about the email and no one told me how to acess it!--Will N. 16:44, 5 June 2007 (EDT)

How to access your email? It should just be sent to whatever email you signed up to the site with. DanH 16:45, 5 June 2007 (EDT)

O thanks. Um Tk told me you also get a email through conservapedia. So I got that confused.--Will N. 16:47, 5 June 2007 (EDT)

That may be what he meant. DanH 16:47, 5 June 2007 (EDT)

Yes, it was. Will, if your email is enabled here, users can email you, CP will forward it to your regular email account. If you reply to them via your email client, they will also have your email. If you respond to them via the CP "email this user" deal, they will not. --Sysop-TK _/MyTalk 06:05, 6 June 2007 (EDT)

Should I block Brainslug? Brainslug created Zimbardo Cookie Experiment and has had a 2 hour block in his past. ~Beth~

Yes. If he wants back, he can email you and plead his case. DanH 13:17, 6 June 2007 (EDT)

Question

How was your paper on Putin? Bohdan 15:17, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

well done. He is not a good guy. Bohdan 15:57, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

Andorra

On the matter of Andorra, look at who the edits before me were made by; So Alone who was blocked for being a sock of this one guy. Do you think his edits are trustworthy? UnderCurrent 16:35, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

Thanks for pointing that out! Definitely not trustworthy. DanH 16:38, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

P.S. Where would one find a compendium on user boxes around here? UnderCurrent 16:53, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Userboxes DanH 16:56, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

Question

Hello, I was looking at the user creation log and I noticed this:

15:08, 12 June 2007 HolographicMedia (Talk | contribs | block) created account for User:OpticalEthernet (Talk | contribs | block)

What happened, and is this allowed? Can users create accounts for others like this?Bohdan 17:56, 12 June 2007 (EDT)

I'm not sure how that works, but I think that without an explanation given, it generally isn't allowed. I know that HolographicMedia was blocked earlier today. DanH 17:58, 12 June 2007 (EDT)

you missed

I think you missed User:MartyFillmore. --Colest 18:43, 12 June 2007 (EDT)

Image

Hello, Dan. I see you protected an image I uploaded. Did you, by any chance, look at the talk page? The image is a modified version of a Wikipedia image, and I wasn't sure if it was acceptable. Thanks! Greg 00:31, 14 June 2007 (EDT)

War Elephants

Hell ya it is!--Will N. 15:25, 14 June 2007 (EDT)

I bet its true Bohdan 17:48, 18 June 2007 (EDT)

Request for assistence in writing Article.

I have noted that two rather influential Supreme Court Justices have not managed to receive articles about them, namely, Hugo L. Black and William O. Douglas. However previous attempts at writing articles have ended in deletion as the result of perhaps a bit too overt a bias, I have the beginnings of an article but am not remotely certain as to how I should proceed from here without repeating past mistakes. If at all possible could you review the beginnings of the page and lend me some of your wisdom? Thanks-N. i. V.Nullius in Verba 08:40, 19 June 2007 (EDT)

• Don't bother, Dan. I rather think old Nullius will have a problem with soiled robes, and won't be able to participate. --Sysop-TK _/MyTalk 09:26, 19 June 2007 (EDT)

Freedom

Dan, have you seen the Freedom entry? [5] This article probably needs some serious treatment. Any idea who we can recruit to work on it? Thanks. RobS 13:32, 20 June 2007 (EDT)

I'll ask Karajou. Thanks. RobS 13:37, 20 June 2007 (EDT)

It's on my list, boys. This should have been emailed, to keep from crossing up. --Sysop-TK _/MyTalk 08:21, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

script?

do we italicize book titles? Thanks!--Staple^HI! 15:01, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

I have before, at least. DanH 15:02, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

Vandalism

Where was my signature dishonestly used? I'd like to see. Scorpion^{Vote for Pedro} 17:50, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

I looked through the history and couldn't really find anything that looked like vandalism (except for that crap by Humorless). Could you perhaps direct me to the diff? Scorpion^{Vote for Pedro} 15:22, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

FF Vandal

Is there something we can do? TK was helping me but he signed off AIM.--Elamdri 00:03, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

We can lock the database for a few seconds if it doesn't let up. DanH 00:04, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

I don't think thats going to deter him. TK has done it three times now.--Elamdri 00:07, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

Who goes to bed at 11?--Elamdri 00:18, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

Kids. Niandra ^talk 00:19, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

When I was a kid, I wasn't allowed online past 11. DanH 00:18, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

When I was a kid we didn't have internet...--Elamdri 00:20, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

Liar! That was me! :p --Sysop-TK _/MyTalk 01:59, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

Ok, lemme rephrase, when I was a kid we couldn't AFFORD the internet.--Elamdri 02:01, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

Hi There!

I hear that you're against Wikipedia. Me too. They accused me for Disruption, Single purpose account created for AFD purposes. I like you and your site.--Edtropolis 15:38, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

Back

thanks! My final marks for the year were five "A"s and one "B". --Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ^talk 22:41, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

Thank you for the welcome

As a disgruntled former Wikipedian, I appreciate it. Jinxmchue 23:34, 23 June 2007 (EDT)

Keepp fighting

Ya will do but I am going away until next monday which would be july 2.--Will N. 14:11, 24 June 2007 (EDT)

WoW article

We had a guy copy and paste a bunch of junk to the article from wikipedia, but I accidentally edited it before I caught it. Is it possible to rollback to BethanyS's edit, or does it have to be done manually?

I got it. DanH 19:06, 24 June 2007 (EDT)

Samoza regime

What a joke. It never takes long for bleedingheartliberal's to respond after upsetting their plans. Thanks. [6]

Philistines

LoL - I would have picked it up when I rewrite it later, honest :P - need to watch "Heroes" first though, back in a blink File:User Fox.png Fox (talk|contribs) 16:44, 25 June 2007 (EDT)

Your question

Because I think many people may search that word.

Dissidents

Not much of an article unless it gives some examples, no? Guitarplayer 18:06, 25 June 2007 (EDT) At least my version didn't editorialise, but provided a list I was hoping to expand Guitarplayer 18:07, 25 June 2007 (EDT)

VANDAL

Someone is being a busy boy - shut him down Guitarplayer 18:22, 25 June 2007 (EDT)

Wiki Research

Thanks for your help. Sutton4019 10:02, 26 June 2007 (EDT)

Hello Dan

Hi Dan, as someone who is not a conservative, I'm seeking your view for recent changes made at John the Baptist. I am concerned with the direction taken and the actions taken to force a change to stand that I believe is inappropriate. Could you please add your input? Thanks Learn together 11:54, 28 June 2007 (EDT)

Thanks

I appreciate the unblocking. It just came to my attention. Do you have any idea how it came to happen? I had never done any edits here when I was blocked.--Neiljohnson 15:09, 29 June 2007 (EDT)

Funny Coincidence

Ha,ha! I was in the process of blocking ihatefags when you did it! --Beth^Talk 15:45, 29 June 2007 (EDT)

What happened earlier? It looked frightening. Bohdan 01:11, 1 July 2007 (EDT)

It's a really long story. Email me. DanH 01:12, 1 July 2007 (EDT)

Will do. Bohdan 01:13, 1 July 2007 (EDT)

I left some funny messages......

For our dear friends on their talk pages. I know you will enjoy! :p --Sysop-TK _/MyTalk 03:52, 1 July 2007 (EDT)

Mountain Dew

To the most stimulating (and highly caffeinated) sysop I know, welcome back! Yo da man! Woo woo! :-) --Ed Poor ^Talk 23:11, 1 July 2007 (EDT)

narniaexpert

Ok sorry about all the troll before. I was trying to see if I could hack it unlike wikipedia. Good job anyway. Well WHY DO YOU KEEP BLOCKING ME!!! I gave up trying to see if I could hack you guys. I was making up for it by contributing to the site I hand wrote an article about Linkin Park and was working on beefing up the Walt Disney page and what do you do DELETE ME! If your going to delete me then atleast leave up my hard work on the Linkin Park page. I'm really sorry about the troll just please let me get back and add some more articles to increse the site's slim number of music/tech articles.

BTW if you look up troll in the dictionary it is defined as repedidly posting offensive content repedtively onto websites. I don't consider Disneyland very offensive lol ;-P anyway sorry for the troll but could you please let me finish putting up some Apple related pages.

• Cobblenet, if your contribs are legit, you are welcome here. Just spare us any vanalism, and keep to the editors rules...and I'll let you live tonight, and Dan can decide tomorrow, okay? That fair? --Sysop-TK _/MyTalk 01:02, 2 July 2007 (EDT)

• Ok but what are the editors rules exactly. I was actualy talking about my real account Narniaexpert /Narniaexpert not my sock puppet

Can you help

I am trying to add a universal infobox template to US presidents but cannot access the following

1. Richard Nixon
2. Ronald Wilson Reagan
3. George H. W. Bush
4. George W. Bush

Could you either unlock them for me for a short period to make the additions, or add the info on my behalf. Thanks BrianCo 15:52, 2 July 2007 (EDT)

Team contest

I would like to have you on my team in our new team contest. Please let me know if you are able to compete. ~ Sharon^Talk 16:30, 2 July 2007 (EDT)

John54

The name, the time without doing nothing, are the same profile of vandals. We can see if he is not, waiting for a mail asking unblocking. This procedure has become necessary as we are under fire. The instructions are "it is better to make a mistake than to allow vandals". But you may unblock him if you consider it proper. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 16:30, 4 July 2007 (EDT)

Hello!

How are you, Dan? --Samian

I'm good and yourself? DanH 21:07, 6 July 2007 (EDT)

Arguments for God

Um, not trying to be difficult, but what was the reason for your revert? Mike K 21:29, 4 July 2007 (EDT)

Dan is mean

Hey dan, whats up with you blocking people for no reason. Shouldn't people be able to be here peacefully without breaking any of the rules? what's your deal?

What was your other name? DanH 21:06, 6 July 2007 (EDT)

• Pssst, don't tell him! Like you said, he's "mean". Tell me. :p --Sysop-TK _/MyTalk 22:12, 6 July 2007 (EDT)

Thanks

Thanks a lot for the help yesterday! --Tash 08:56, 7 July 2007 (EDT)

question

How do you take something out of our spam filter and how do you put something back in? I am having problems editing the homosexuality article. Conservative 18:03, 11 July 2007 (EDT)

unicode

Do you know how to use unicode to avoid the spam filter? Conservative 18:30, 11 July 2007 (EDT)

Vandal?

So I'm a "vandal" am I? Clean out your ears, knucklehead, because I'm about to tell you something about real vandals. The real Vandals were a race of pagan barbarian murderers and thieves who swept across Europe killing anyone who got in the way of their "fun." Know who does that sound like? Not me, certainly. Maybe it sounds like those stupid teenagers you cater to on this site, who just want to "get high" and play their little murder simulators, no matter what it's doing to their family, their culture, or their country.

When I found this place, I thought it was finally the venue(look it up if you don't know what it means) for truth about dangerous parts of popular culture like Dungeons and Dragons and violent video games. You try to insert some truth into the articles over on Wacopedia, and you get shot down by mindless liberals chanting their little mantras "It's just a game," "You're a close minded fanatic," and "Get a life." I've got a life, junior, and it's a lot better than yours because I go OUTSIDE once and a while. But this was supposed to be where people can showcase a conservative(read: realistic) viewpoint on this filth. And when I come back, what do I find? Some scrawny little coward had deleted all my work and called me a "vandal."

YOU are the real vandals, peddling this smut to young children who come here to escape from the cesspit that is Wacopedia. Their loving parents see all the conservative trappings here and say, "Oh, this must be safe," but most probably never take the time to actualy read the idiotic and subversive lies you present as truth. Let's take a look, shall we?

The article on video games has pages full of nice, harmless sounding fluff, but how much information does it have on the scientificly proven pyschological effects they have on people who become violent and obsessed from playing them? A SINGLE line at the very bottom of the page about Grand Theft Auto, which everyone has already heard about and a comment from some pixelante about how we shouldn't "judge" video games based on what "a couple crazy kids did." That's the same tired rhetoric used by hippies who want their pot legalized. "Hey, man, a couple of people kill each other over drugs. But, like, the ends(brainwashed teenagers having "fun") justify the means(the death of the innocent" Here's an idea. Get out of your parent's basement and try actually living life, instead of rehearse taking the lives of those who are actually doing something worthwhile.

Your article on Dungeons and Dragons is also very telling. It's got three sections on how to play the game, and I counted at least six different places where criticism is deflected, and that's without reading the section on the "Magic System" (I don't worship the devil, and I'm not planning on casting any magic spells anytime soon, so why on earth would I read a section about how to do so?). I wander how parents would feel if they found out your website had occult knowledge right out in the open? But, hey, I suppose "If it feels good, do it." And if anybody trys to stop us, we can just plug our fingers in our ears and concentrate on something that makes us feel all warm and fuzzy inside, like how your article on Hitler calls him evil. Well, duh!. A bunch of book burners is what you are, heeping all the truth about anything wrong that isn't one of your pet causes onto the bonfire with your morals and common decency.

My page on "anime," as these perverted freak call it, was mangled. Your little slant eyed toadie, Ed Poor Morals, only had the courage to put a little note at the end about how well this sick "art" blends into porn.(Of course, some little brain fried deliquent has already subtely changed even that, so it sounds much less disgusting than it really is.) I can only thank God that you left enough of my message in that parents will be able to see the link to porn, and stop their kids from becoming ignorant sociopaths, kinda like most of the people on this site.

And finally let's look at your little advertisement for online games(your page on Massively Multiplayer Online Roleplaying Games, in case you don't know). I clicked on a few, then went back and got rid of the links to protect children from smut. I even put a note saying that they weren't family friendly. And what did one of you little cowards do? Put them back and said "I hope he's not right about them not being family friendly." Here's a novel ideal, why don't you actually CHECK? Then you could see all the violence, New Age idealogy, and practical nudity in these "family friendly" websites. But you won't do that. I'm on to you. You've probably got a little side deal with the game companies. You give them free advertising with a spin that makes it seem like their product is harmless, and you get some money for the advertising.

That just makes me sick. These children come to you for the facts without the bias and lies most media shoves down their throats. And what do you do? Line them up and march them right into the hands of the gaming companies that don't care if people get hurt or if society is degraded, as long as they can make a buck. Most gaming companies are Japanese, did you know that? Or where you too distracted by counting your shiny silver coins to actually research what you were doing? Sure, but who cares right. Aren't the Japanese Buddhist? So they believe in love and peace, right? Islam is the FASTEST GROWING religion in the world. You're kidding yourself if you think none of the Japs have converted so they could get their 72 virgins. Even a search on the internet will show you thousands of site about people who have stolen, killed themselves or others, and wasted their lives on twisted "entertainment." How many repeats of Columbine will it take before you wake up and do your part to stop this insanity?

But, I suppose this will fall on deaf ears. After all, George Washington said "Few men have virtue to withstand the highest bidder." But you don't really understand what you're selling. Will you still mock me when it one of YOUR friends or loved ones who gets gunned down by some pale, greasy gamer who's driving down the street thinking the people he's shooting aren't real, or kidnapped so some lunatic in a black robe can sacrifice them to his Dungeons and Dragons gods(who are really demons) so he can get a better result for his latest spell? Will you still think that it's all just "harmless fun" and that you don't need to warn people about a very real danger to themselves and their families then? You can do the right thing. You can stop censoring people who come here to expose the truth. You could save a life by stopping some innocent little boy from growing up to be a deranged killer.

I'm probably wasting my time though. You've probably already thrown away your mind, drooling over the latest murder simulator with all the biggest looking swords and "coolest" spells. People who try to spread the truth are always harrassed and mocked, but good always wins in the end. Hopefully, enough people will read this and do a little research on these subjects. Then they'll try to clear up the lies and misconceptions you have all over this place. They'll get censored and thrown out of course. But soon, enough people will see through these blatant advertisments for this smut and try to correct it you'll be doing nothing but trying to stem the tide of light into the tangle of biased nonsense you're using to shield your spineless business partners, who have to use tactics like this because they're to cowardly to come out in the open and defend their dangerous product. And do you know why? Because they can't. I know it, they know it, and, deep down, you know it too.

I'll be praying that somehow you find it in your heart(or at least the part that hasn't been destroyed by the dehumanizing messages these things send) to help spread the truth.

(P.S. Oh, and I'm not Jack Chick. Contrary to what you might believe, there is more than one person in this country with that name.)

This post wins the internet. Anyways, if I were to guess, it's this guy. [7] --Colest 22:52, 12 July 2007 (EDT)