Graham's hierarchy of disagreement
From Conservapedia
This is the current revision of Graham's hierarchy of disagreement as edited by Conservative (Talk | contribs) at 02:39, June 10, 2025. This URL is a permanent link to this version of this page.
Graham's hierarchy of disagreement is a conceptual framework proposed by the computer scientist Paul Graham in his 2008 essay entitled How to Disagree.[1]
The Graham's hierarchy of disagreement conceptual pyramid suggests ways to improve one’s arguments, and have more logical, substantive and constructive disagreements.[2]
See also
- Civil discourse
- Evidence-based thinking
- Falsification
- Rhetoric
- Logic
- Rationality
- Irrational thinking
