User talk:Sievert 81/drafts
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sievert 81 (talk | contribs) at 20:52, December 5, 2020. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Blackpillers are leftwing. Some blackpillers claim to be rightwing, however the ones that do are almost exclusively neo-Nazis and thus leftwing instead. Better?
- What is the purpose of making any reference to "right-wing"? Alleged "right-wingers" tend to be individualists, and not part of any organized collective. RobSFree Kyle! 15:32, 5 December 2020 (EST)
- Because a lot of them like to claim they are and fool a lot of people. I want to discredit them. Sievert 81 (talk) 15:33, 5 December 2020 (EST)
- (ec)For example, any alleged "right-winger" could see a "Unite the Right" rally was community organized leftwing bait, and would stay miles away. RobSFree Kyle! 15:35, 5 December 2020 (EST)
- How about 'Most blackpillers are far-left. There are 2 main types: Neo-Nazis and socialists. Sievert 81 (talk) 15:36, 5 December 2020 (EST)
- Sounds good. My suggestion is, if the they are neo-Nazis, label them as such. Debating or discussing in mainspace whether godless socialists are God-fearing bible thumping right wingers on every page like this is somewhat pointless. RobSFree Kyle! 15:41, 5 December 2020 (EST)
- I'm working on articles for all the pill ideologies: pink (female version of blackpill), blue (liberal fact-denying), red (right-wing people who don't deny reality like bluepillers read: 95% of CP) and this one. Sievert 81 (talk) 15:46, 5 December 2020 (EST)
- A good rule of thumb to follow is, at CP we try to avoid filling up mainspace articles with MSM/DNC talking points. Just stick to the facts. Where refutation is necessary, it generally can be covered in its own subsection. RobSFree Kyle! 15:51, 5 December 2020 (EST)
- Should I make a section in the blackpill article debunking that they are rightwing, or ignore it completely? Sievert 81 (talk) 15:52, 5 December 2020 (EST)
- A good rule of thumb to follow is, at CP we try to avoid filling up mainspace articles with MSM/DNC talking points. Just stick to the facts. Where refutation is necessary, it generally can be covered in its own subsection. RobSFree Kyle! 15:51, 5 December 2020 (EST)
- I'm working on articles for all the pill ideologies: pink (female version of blackpill), blue (liberal fact-denying), red (right-wing people who don't deny reality like bluepillers read: 95% of CP) and this one. Sievert 81 (talk) 15:46, 5 December 2020 (EST)
- Sounds good. My suggestion is, if the they are neo-Nazis, label them as such. Debating or discussing in mainspace whether godless socialists are God-fearing bible thumping right wingers on every page like this is somewhat pointless. RobSFree Kyle! 15:41, 5 December 2020 (EST)
- How about 'Most blackpillers are far-left. There are 2 main types: Neo-Nazis and socialists. Sievert 81 (talk) 15:36, 5 December 2020 (EST)
- (ec)For example, any alleged "right-winger" could see a "Unite the Right" rally was community organized leftwing bait, and would stay miles away. RobSFree Kyle! 15:35, 5 December 2020 (EST)