User talk:Sievert 81/drafts

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sievert 81 (talk | contribs) at 20:46, December 5, 2020. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Blackpillers are leftwing. Some blackpillers claim to be rightwing, however the ones that do are almost exclusively neo-Nazis and thus leftwing instead. Better?

What is the purpose of making any reference to "right-wing"? Alleged "right-wingers" tend to be individualists, and not part of any organized collective. RobSFree Kyle! 15:32, 5 December 2020 (EST)
Because a lot of them like to claim they are and fool a lot of people. I want to discredit them. Sievert 81 (talk) 15:33, 5 December 2020 (EST)
(ec)For example, any alleged "right-winger" could see a "Unite the Right" rally was community organized leftwing bait, and would stay miles away. RobSFree Kyle! 15:35, 5 December 2020 (EST)
How about 'Most blackpillers are far-left. There are 2 main types: Neo-Nazis and socialists. Sievert 81 (talk) 15:36, 5 December 2020 (EST)
Sounds good. My suggestion is, if the they are neo-Nazis, label them as such. Debating or discussing in mainspace whether godless socialists are God-fearing bible thumping right wingers on every page like this is somewhat pointless. RobSFree Kyle! 15:41, 5 December 2020 (EST)
I'm working on articles for all the pill ideologies: pink (female version of blackpill), blue (liberal fact-denying), red (right-wing people who don't deny reality like bluepillers) and this one. Sievert 81 (talk) 15:46, 5 December 2020 (EST)