Miranda v. Arizona
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aschlafly (talk | contribs) at 04:58, February 19, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), was a landmark decision by the Warren Court establishing a new right of those accused of a crime to receive a series of warnings from police before being interrogated. These warnings, known as the "Miranda warnings," include:
- the right to remain silent
- the right to have an attorney presented
- the right to have an attorney appointed if desired
- the right to know that anything said can and will be used against the accused
Conservatives objected strenuously to this decision, which freed a convicted rapist and many other past and future criminals who had not received these warnings.