Debate:How can we protect Conservapedia by distinguishing real conservative encyclopedia articles from satires written by liberals?

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Czolgolz (talk | contribs) at 17:40, April 17, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Does this debate topic imply that there is no difference between conservative positions and liberal satire? There are no liberal satires in conservapedia because the editors correct them. Conservapedia is the most reliable and accurate resource for unbiased perspective on all topics covered.Rebiu 13:28, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

I disagree. I see several articles about people who never existed, but sound like they might have. Case in point, all the Spanish profanity on the Cambodia page that sat there for over a month until I decided to let everyone in on the joke. Czolgolz 13:36, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

how does Wikipedia do it?Jaques 13:39, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

Wikipedia has thousands of times more users...and hence is much more likely to notice factual errors. Conservapdia has a small (as of now) user base, and hence, articles may go weeks, or even months without anyone noticing incorrect dates, spellings, facts, and blatant fabrications. Czolgolz 13:40, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:How_can_we_protect_Conservapedia_by_distinguishing_real_conservative_encyclopedia_articles_from_satires_written_by_liberals%3F&oldid=113085"