Talk:Matt Dillahunty

Can We Unlock This Page?

I wanted to add to it, but for some reason it's protected

Proposed edits can be suggested here.--Andy Schlafly 01:15, 9 March 2013 (EST)

Matt's Response

I'd like to post Matt's response to the question beyond "he didn't answer it to SOG's satisfaction." He had an interesting response, i'd like to post it...both the unicorn in the box analogy and his claim that the nature of the question being non-nonsensical. If we are truly objective we should display it within the article itself rather than a link within a link. I say this because...(i know this is heresy within this wikia) although it looks great on it's face, he has a point (in my humble opinion) when we turn the "atheism" into a variable and apply it to leprechauns, unicorns, faeries, or dragons, you arrive at the same problem. Regardless of our opposing opinions on the subject lets allow people to make up their own mind on his response. It does not reflect badly on theism to include it nor is it a convincing argument for atheism to include his response. But i'll respect your decision if you choose not to allow my edits as I know how heavily you promote Shockofgod. But despite this we should try to apply the same logical standards to ourselves as we do to liberals within this Wikia. If we don't we're no better than liberals/atheists/homosexuals we rail against.[[user:dsherman]