Page history
Talk: Starlight problem
January 31, 2012
→39 billion light years away?
+151
→39 billion light years away?
m+8
→39 billion light years away?
+208
no edit summary
+1,263
→39 billion light years away?: gram
m+3
→39 billion light years away?: how fast or slow?
+231
→39 billion light years away?
+370
→39 billion light years away?
+267
→39 billion light years away?: f there is no test, then it is not a scientific "fact".
+260
→39 billion light years away?
+414
→39 billion light years away?
+226
→39 billion light years away?
m+1
→39 billion light years away?
+470
→39 billion light years away?: question on rate of expansion
+342
→39 billion light years away?: Please explain how you would test that "fact".
+113
→39 billion light years away?
+120
→39 billion light years away?: reply
+321
→39 billion light years away?: fine
+214
→39 billion light years away?
+412
→39 billion light years away?
+213
→39 billion light years away?: No, I do not.
+164
→39 billion light years away?
+199
→39 billion light years away?
+544
→39 billion light years away?: Don't know
+106
→39 billion light years away?
+171
→39 billion light years away?: question
+699
moved thread for contiguity
January 30, 2012
→39 billion light years away?
+533
→39 billion light years away?: reply
+217
→39 billion light years away?
+54
39 billion light years?
+522
July 22, 2011
December 15, 2010
August 20, 2010
May 29, 2010
→Backward versions: Usually the goal of an invention is attained first before an assembly line is built to mass produce it.
+362
→Backward versions
+410
May 28, 2010
Undo revision 782710 by PoundMeHarderTK (Talk)
→Backward versions
→Backward versions
+5
→Backward versions
-2
no edit summary
+6
no edit summary
+11
no edit summary
+5
→Backward versions
+23
→Backward versions
+649
→Backward versions
+648