Page history
December 14, 2009
→Wikipedia is not helpful
+3,059
I'm going to increase Edmund's block duration because he offended those having disabilities. Obama did the same thing.
+187
→Wikipedia is not helpful
+144
no edit summary
+427
→Wikipedia is not helpful
+1,457
→Wikipedia is not helpful: Wikipedia won't allow the more prominent placement of key information. We provide information here, and welcome others who want to do that
+487
→Wikipedia is not helpful
+1,052
Wikipedia is a good home for your approach. We emphasize information here, not a (false) appearance of neutrality.
+849
→Wikipedia is helpful
+1,135
corrected
m+1
Please show me where, for example, Wikipedia's entry on abortion informs readers about how it causes premature birth (the major cause of premature death and lifelong disabilities) in future-born child
+739
→Wikipedia is helpful
+1,549
Wouldn't you agree that allowing gossip and lacking rules to reduce liberal bias by anonymous editors are disqualifying conditions?
+416
→Wikipedia is helpful
+393
→Wikipedia is helpful
+826
→Wikipedia is helpful
+328
no edit summary
+700
I'm confident that a study of Wikipedia would yield the same results as the study of Facebook did. I bet both are correlated to lower grades, not higher ones.
+839
→Wikipedia is helpful
+53
→Wikipedia is helpful
+536
→Wikipedia is helpful
+923
→Wikipedia is helpful
+53
→Wikipedia is helpful
+1,012
Undo revision 730968 by Insufficient (Talk) I don't think you should just change this FAQ
-26
→Does Conservapedia have a conservative bias?
+26
→Wikipedia is helpful
+1,046
December 13, 2009
no edit summary
+986
→Wikipedia is helpful
+3
→Wikipedia is helpful
+453
→Wikipedia is helpful
+211
→Wikipedia is helpful
+277
→Wikipedia is helpful
+622
→Wikipedia is helpful
+789
illustration of how Wikipedia is a waste of time
+206
→Wikipedia is helpful: I want to create my own reality the way you are.
+264
→Wikipedia is helpful: Wikipedia is comparable to Facebook, and it's shown to hurt grades rather than help them.
+854
→Wikipedia is helpful
+665
Facebook is perhaps the best analogy: it is more popular and has far higher revenues than Wikipedia, yet at least one study shows it is correlated with ''lower'' grades by users.
+390
→Wikipedia is helpful: @aschlafly
+344
→Wikipedia is helpful
+412
Reverted edits by DaveC (Talk) to last version by Aschlafly
m-160
→Wikipedia is helpful
+160
→Wikipedia is helpful: I googled "thank you Budweiser" and received nearly 40,000 hits. Do you think that proves that beer is helping people? Certainly not.
+336
→Wikipedia is helpful
+6
→Wikipedia is helpful
+295
→Wikipedia is helpful
+325
e're obviously teaching and learning and not trying to be a dictionary, so your point remains unclear.
+267
Wikipedians seem to insist on making professors look better than they are or were. Your style may fit well in the Wikipedia culture. But as I said, I'm not aware of anyone helped by it.
+491
→Wikipedia is helpful
+1,120
no edit summary
+2,003