Page history
December 18, 2008
Reverted edits by TCochrane (Talk) to last version by Aschlafly
m+82
Undo unexplained reversions.
-71
Undo revision 589486 by Aschlafly (Talk)Undo unexplained reversions
-11
refined definition; reverted liberal spin
+11
Reverted edits by TCochrane (Talk) to last version by Aschlafly
m+71
Improved definition. Removed reference to lawyers (which appears to be contradicted by the paragraph below) and politicians (have pity on them).
-71
August 25, 2008
revert to clear, concise, and accurate definition
-1,469
grammar
m+5
Not necessarily happy with new introduction, but this improves it a bit.
+157
August 23, 2008
August 6, 2008
July 14, 2008
July 7, 2008
June 19, 2008
June 18, 2008
→Origin, in TalkOrigins.org
+329
Reverted edits by JackSmith (Talk); changed back to last version by Philip J. Rayment
m+1,355
→Fact: Defining Quote Mining
m-4
Fixed some parts of the quote mining article to accurately portray what quote mining actually is.
-1,351
June 8, 2008
June 7, 2008
March 8, 2008
March 7, 2008
cherry picking and misquotation, where favorable positions are amplified or falsely suggested, and unfavorable positions in the same text are excluded or otherwise obscured
+403
link to discrediting attack - a sneaky form of ad hominem
+24
March 4, 2008
typo
+5
→Origin, in TalkOrigins.org: removed liberal bias
-56
Reverted edits by PhoenixWright (Talk); changed back to last version by Aschlafly
m-25
Aschlafly, I don't see the liberal bias, but maybe before making major edits you could talk to Phil Rayment and I about it. We collaborated ont he last version, and avoided an edit war by doing so.
+25
clarified intro - too much liberal bias is distorting this entry
-25
→Origin, in TalkOrigins.org: Partial reinstatement; see talk shortly.
+105
removed pursuant to talk page
-272
oops
+21
We're working on this on the talk page. Please help there?
-27
better
+12
cleaned up the definition, removed liberal bias
+381
→Origin, in TalkOrigins.org
+166
→Origin, in TalkOrigins.org
+225
Undo revision 398278 by Special:Contributions/Philip J. Rayment (User talk:Philip J. Rayment) I'll discuss, but I did this because it seems to be a subjective judgment. Better left at neutral
-25
→Origin, in TalkOrigins.org: Revert to more accurate statement.
+25
I was wrong, CreationWiki is back up
-125
improved and streamlined for searches; the removed section is addressed below
-188
→Origin, in TalkOrigins.org
-111
fix
-37
→Fact
+73
vastly improved.
+4,244
February 20, 2008
February 19, 2008
It's the creationists doing the quoting, even though they are quoting evolutionists; further changes for clarity and sentence structure
+34
an attempt to improve and clarify the first paragraph
+88
It's not so usually used to refer to individual quotes