Last modified on March 11, 2007, at 21:13

User talk:SharonS

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GofG (Talk | contribs) at 21:13, March 11, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Return to "SharonS" page.
Welcome to SharonS's talk page. Please enter any messages you have for me below.


Protection of pages

Dear Sharon,

In principle, I agree with you regarding protecting pages. However, with that being said I saw JoshuaZ unreasonably removing scholarly cautions regarding evolutionary ideas concerning planet formation. I believe he did that because he is unreasonable. Perhaps now that he has a higher profile in regards to supressing creationist criticisms he will stop doing it. I am not very hopeful regarding this matter based on my experiences with him at Wikipedia, however, although I would be pleasantly surprised if he does cease and desist. I wrote Aschafly about reconsidering his reversal of banning and I will see what his response is. With that being said I will try to temper my protecting of certain pages unless I see continued supression of creationist material. Conservative 15:34, 1 March 2007 (EST)conservative

Please don't make personal attacks. [[User:Linus M.|Geekman314<sup>([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]])</sup>]] 09:34, 9 March 2007 (EST)

Dear Sharon,

Your message to User "ILOVEJESUS" does not seem to have taken. He chopped out a portion of my Debate Topic on Infinite regression; of course I put my content back using the History feature. I also did not appreciate his calling what he did a "minor edit." Must I set my preferences to advise me of all changes, major or minor?--TerryH 23:46, 7 March 2007 (EST)

Thanks Sharon

Thoughtful of you to help. --Horace 20:10, 8 March 2007 (EST)

Ketchup addition

What a great addition: ketchup! I really, really enjoyed that News of the Day, Sharon. Thank you!

I'm still laughing about that, Sharon. Your point about ketchup is hilarious!--Aschlafly 15:15, 9 March 2007 (EST)

Julius Caesar

I notice on that article that the large majority of the information was copied, by you, from a lecture on CP. While this isn't really breaking any rules, it's a bit strange. Do you think you could reword it so that it doens't look like it was copypasted from a lecture? GofG 17:13, 11 March 2007 (EDT)