User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 21:58, December 3, 2008 diff hist +431 Talk:Priesthood of all believers ++comment current
- 17:08, December 3, 2008 diff hist +529 Debate: Are Catholics Christians? →Apostolic Succession: Agreed. Catholics and Greek Orthodox churches considered (still do?) protestants heretics.
- 16:45, December 3, 2008 diff hist +210 Talk:Priesthood of all believers next, i will add postive description per suggestion.
- 16:17, December 3, 2008 diff hist 0 m Debate: Are Catholics Christians? →YES: -c +C
- 16:16, December 3, 2008 diff hist +639 Debate: Are Catholics Christians? →YES: a good sign (usually yes) but no guarantees
- 15:50, December 3, 2008 diff hist +528 New! Priesthood of all believers new article (this doctrine always seemed important to me, pardon my ideas they tend to be a bit wooly and wordy)
- 14:23, December 3, 2008 diff hist +692 New! Reinhold Niebuhr New article (will admit I have a deep respect for Niebuhr, but remain horrified by some of his early communist activities)
- 05:27, December 3, 2008 diff hist +54 m Religious Left →Members of neo-orthodoxy: +emphatically embracing the doctrince of original sin
- 04:45, December 3, 2008 diff hist -18 m Religious Left →Members of neo-orthodoxy: -, -they -had a great deal of respect for +held +in high regard
- 03:26, December 3, 2008 diff hist +6 m Religious Left →Members of neo-orthodoxy: -retained +still had +deal
- 03:25, December 3, 2008 diff hist +537 Religious Left →Christian Leftists: ++section on neo-orthodoxy (i.e., crisis theology)
- 03:07, December 3, 2008 diff hist +158 Religious Left ++important characteristic separating Religious Left from Religious Right
- 02:00, December 3, 2008 diff hist +1,646 Talk:Science fiction ++commentary on theofiction
- 20:36, December 2, 2008 diff hist +46 m Debate:Can conservapedia become the next Wikipedia, is this good or bad ++edit my response
- 20:27, December 2, 2008 diff hist +1,156 Debate:Can conservapedia become the next Wikipedia, is this good or bad ++comment (believe that conservapedia can become the next wikipedia)
- 19:24, December 2, 2008 diff hist +4 m Science is a Sacred Cow →Reception: add italics to Time Magazine phrase
- 18:58, December 2, 2008 diff hist +36 Science is a Sacred Cow +and a half dozen editorial cartoons
- 18:53, December 2, 2008 diff hist +7 m Science is a Sacred Cow →Reception: ~from he to [Standen]
- 18:51, December 2, 2008 diff hist +18 m Science is a Sacred Cow →Reception: add link to Life Magazine
- 18:46, December 2, 2008 diff hist +161 Science is a Sacred Cow ++quote from Life magazine article
- 18:30, December 2, 2008 diff hist -7 m Science is a Sacred Cow →Reception: ~recast sentence
- 18:24, December 2, 2008 diff hist +1 m Science is a Sacred Cow →Reception: +s
- 18:22, December 2, 2008 diff hist +509 Science is a Sacred Cow →Thesis: ~change to →Reception: and ++comment from Life magazine editor (March 27, 1950, page 103) ~fix spelling of indulged
- 18:11, December 2, 2008 diff hist +19 Science is a Sacred Cow ++ref
- 18:09, December 2, 2008 diff hist +37 Science is a Sacred Cow ~re-arrange material. Note: other than the New York Times article), have yet to read about Albert Einstein's comments on this text
- 18:04, December 2, 2008 diff hist +8 Science is a Sacred Cow ~an attempt to make the lead more accurate
- 18:00, December 2, 2008 diff hist +16 Anthony Standen →External links: +(pages 103-114)
- 16:50, December 2, 2008 diff hist +242 Talk:Science is a Sacred Cow ++request for suggestions and concerns current
- 16:37, December 2, 2008 diff hist +255 Talk:Science is a Sacred Cow ++actions taken in response to your concerns ++in agreement with Anthony Standen addition
- 16:18, December 2, 2008 diff hist -1,003 Science is a Sacred Cow →Contents: -remove extra list
- 16:18, December 2, 2008 diff hist +1,032 Science is a Sacred Cow ++put list as reference
- 16:16, December 2, 2008 diff hist +9 Science is a Sacred Cow →List of review citations: ++change to reference
- 16:09, December 2, 2008 diff hist +17 Science is a Sacred Cow →Thesis: -are +can be and have been
- 16:08, December 2, 2008 diff hist +22 Science is a Sacred Cow →Thesis: +March 1950 issue of
- 16:07, December 2, 2008 diff hist +193 Science is a Sacred Cow →Thesis: ++Time magazine's perspective (from March 1950 aritcle)
- 15:46, December 2, 2008 diff hist 0 Science is a Sacred Cow →Thesis: --extra space
- 15:42, December 2, 2008 diff hist -30 Chad Walsh →Correspondence and encounters with C.S. Lewis: change to /* His frienship with Lewis
- 14:18, December 2, 2008 diff hist +316 Chad Walsh ++Beloit Poetry Journal and external links
- 02:43, December 2, 2008 diff hist +2,428 New! Chad Walsh new article (other facts can be added, but this seems enough to start)
- 21:29, December 1, 2008 diff hist +160 Anthony Standen →External links: ++exact date and additional description
- 17:03, December 1, 2008 diff hist +14 Anthony Standen →External links: +excerpted passages from his book -book
- 17:02, December 1, 2008 diff hist +4 Anthony Standen +March 1950 -which
- 16:57, December 1, 2008 diff hist +12 Science is a Sacred Cow +the chemist
- 16:54, December 1, 2008 diff hist +626 Anthony Standen ++ external links to photos from Life magazine
- 02:47, December 1, 2008 diff hist +136 Science is a Sacred Cow →List of review citations: ++ citation of review found in Time magazine
- 22:07, November 30, 2008 diff hist +441 Science is a Sacred Cow →List of review citations: ++
- 16:14, November 30, 2008 diff hist 0 Anthony Standen ++ make ref marks consistent
- 16:12, November 30, 2008 diff hist +1,073 New! Anthony Standen new article
- 15:26, November 30, 2008 diff hist +556 Science is a Sacred Cow ++review citations; ++links; ++fixes
- 14:57, November 30, 2008 diff hist +1,184 New! Science is a Sacred Cow New article (certainly there is a lot of room for improvement but believe it's good enough now to start)