Difference between revisions of "User talk:Ayzmo"

Revision as of 18:27, January 16, 2012

DON'T MAKE ME SMACK YOU!

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{welcome}}
+DON'T MAKE ME SMACK YOU!
-[[User:KevinDavis|Kevin Davis]] <sup>[[User talk:KevinDavis|Talk]]</sup> 23:07, 15 October 2011 (EDT)
-==OWS==
-I've been watching you add religious people to the sympathizer. I reverted your edits regarding the pope. He did not mention Occupy Wall Street, he mentioned banking reforms and world government that moves away from liberal financial greed. I will research the Archbishop of Canterbury addition next. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 10:22, 2 November 2011 (EDT)
-:I didn't add the Archbishop as you can see in the edit history. He was added by someone else. I just changed it so that it added the internal link as per what I said in my edit description as the person who added it did not. I did no research as to whether or not he supports it but figured I'd fix the formatting. As to the Papal addition, the piece he put out has been widely, from what I've read, been interpreted as sharing the views of OWS if not an endorsement. I haven't read much of the actual piece but it is not exactly a glowing review of American Capitalism. If you don't agree with the addition that's fine, I just thought I'd try and contribute more to that article than just grammar flow and formatting. Thanks for the explanation since I probably would have wondered why. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 17:55, 2 November 2011 (EDT)
-:The addition of Rowan was done by user ScottDG, fyi. And Rowan has, according to the Telegraph article, endorsed the UK branch of OWS currently camped out outside St. Paul's. Unless the quote is false or miss-attributed(same thing really) there is no reason he shouldn't be on the list. Again, like the Pope, I really don't care if he is or not. OWS is not exactly an interest of mine. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 18:02, 2 November 2011 (EDT)
-::Sorry for the mix up in attribution. Rowan did not endorse the Occupy protests, it was recognition. A decision was made not to evict the protesters, which had been the plan. Calling for banking reform might be interpreted as aligning behind the movement as he blames capitalism like the protesters do. The Telegraph headline is a bit misleading "The Archbishop of Canterbury has thrown his weight behind the St Paul’s Cathedral anti-capitalist protesters." As for the Pope, he was not calling for socialism and he was not blaming capitalism. He was blaming greed by way of liberal financial practices. Hardly an endorsement but too tempting for agenda driven WaPo not to hype. Keep up the good work and do tell what Ayzmo stands for. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 18:54, 2 November 2011 (EDT)
-::It isn't a problem. Quick looks at edit logs don't tell much. And that works for me. Again, not my area of interest. I do like to clean up things that bother me though so I wander in now and then because I'm nosy and watch every page I edit.
-::My username is one I've used for what must be going on 10 years or so now. I first used it as a screen name on AIM. It is a typo actually. I was typing a Hebrew word(can't recall the word for the life of me anymore) and in my haste I made a typo and hit enter too quickly. Since then it is a username I have used over and over though I'll admit I have come across others who've used it shockingly enough. It is also my username on Wikipedia. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 19:11, 2 November 2011 (EDT)

Difference between revisions of "User talk:Ayzmo"

Revision as of 18:27, January 16, 2012

Navigation menu

Search