Difference between revisions of "Talk:Scientism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "==Application for Deletion== I'm sorry but this is an atrociously bad article that should be deleted. --~~~~") |
m (Query re paragraph 2) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Application for Deletion== | ==Application for Deletion== | ||
I'm sorry but this is an atrociously bad article that should be deleted. --[[User:HarabecW|HarabecW]] 17:45, 27 June 2011 (EDT) | I'm sorry but this is an atrociously bad article that should be deleted. --[[User:HarabecW|HarabecW]] 17:45, 27 June 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::The second paragraph doesn't appear to make sense where it states: "For example, the claim to know that God exists, despite the fact that it is technically scientifically impossible to disprove anything (i.e. negative proofs are impossible). Despite this, they continue to deny the existence of God without any real scientific proof." I'm afraid I don't understand this at all. Could someone explain please? [[User:NicosB|NicosB]] 01:29, 13 January 2012 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 06:29, January 13, 2012
Application for Deletion
I'm sorry but this is an atrociously bad article that should be deleted. --HarabecW 17:45, 27 June 2011 (EDT)
- The second paragraph doesn't appear to make sense where it states: "For example, the claim to know that God exists, despite the fact that it is technically scientifically impossible to disprove anything (i.e. negative proofs are impossible). Despite this, they continue to deny the existence of God without any real scientific proof." I'm afraid I don't understand this at all. Could someone explain please? NicosB 01:29, 13 January 2012 (EST)