Difference between revisions of "Talk:Naturalistic evolution"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Perhaps it was not because of content, but because it is an unsourced stub, and appears to be an irrelevant statement of opinion better covered elsewhere.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 19:42, 8 April 2007 (EDT) | Perhaps it was not because of content, but because it is an unsourced stub, and appears to be an irrelevant statement of opinion better covered elsewhere.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 19:42, 8 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
:Mh, my thoughts exactly... --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 19:44, 8 April 2007 (EDT) | :Mh, my thoughts exactly... --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 19:44, 8 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Great minds...must have been created alike.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 19:45, 8 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 23:45, April 8, 2007
How does one tell when evolution is guided, and when it is unguided? Teresita 19:37, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
It is untestable and unanswerable, unless you ask Phil.--PalMDtalk 19:38, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
...that's it?
This is the article that got deleted from Wikipedia? Please tell me that was just a figure of speech or something. If that's really the entire thing, I think I know why it got vaped - and no, it's not "because of The Liberals". --Sid 3050 19:41, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
Perhaps it was not because of content, but because it is an unsourced stub, and appears to be an irrelevant statement of opinion better covered elsewhere.--PalMDtalk 19:42, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
- Mh, my thoughts exactly... --Sid 3050 19:44, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
Great minds...must have been created alike.--PalMDtalk 19:45, 8 April 2007 (EDT)