Difference between revisions of "Talk:Liberalism and bestiality"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎This article...: new section)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
I did not know this </sarcasm>. Please don't blindly follow Ann Coulter. Just because a majority appears a certain way, doesn't mean you can group them all into one conglomerate. All squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares. [http://conservapedia.com/Template_talk:Examples_of_Liberal_Bias#Athiests.3F Aschlafly agrees that not all liberals are atheists]. [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 01:23, 28 September 2011 (EDT)
 
I did not know this </sarcasm>. Please don't blindly follow Ann Coulter. Just because a majority appears a certain way, doesn't mean you can group them all into one conglomerate. All squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares. [http://conservapedia.com/Template_talk:Examples_of_Liberal_Bias#Athiests.3F Aschlafly agrees that not all liberals are atheists]. [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 01:23, 28 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
== This article... ==
 +
 +
...like all the others on bestiality you've created during your latest frenzy, is a travesty of what Conservapedia is supposed to be. You should be ashamed of yourself. --[[User:TommyR|TommyR]] 08:39, 28 September 2011 (EDT)

Revision as of 12:39, September 28, 2011

Wow, it's going better and better

70 articles talking about bestiality, and 7 with bestiality in the title!

Must be the bestiality-expert encyclopedia ! Why not rename it bestialopedia ?--ARamis 19:43, 27 September 2011 (EDT)

Fantastic Article

This is a great article and a wonderful addition to an amazing encyclopedia. However, there are several grammar / spelling errors in it, but I can't edit it because it is protected. I'd list the mistakes, but there are unfortunately too many to single out in the talk pages. Could it be temporarily unlocked? -20:02, 27 September 2011 (EDT)

"All liberals are atheists"

I did not know this </sarcasm>. Please don't blindly follow Ann Coulter. Just because a majority appears a certain way, doesn't mean you can group them all into one conglomerate. All squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares. Aschlafly agrees that not all liberals are atheists. ~ JonG ~ 01:23, 28 September 2011 (EDT)

This article...

...like all the others on bestiality you've created during your latest frenzy, is a travesty of what Conservapedia is supposed to be. You should be ashamed of yourself. --TommyR 08:39, 28 September 2011 (EDT)