Difference between revisions of "User talk:Dufrane"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | Sounds like someone failed science class! Karajou, a scientific theory is as good as fact, and the bull passed around on here as fact is much closer to opinion than any thing scientists present. | ||
| + | |||
Two things: 1. Wikipedia is not a source; 2. this website will not post a scientific ''theory'' as if it's a ''fact''. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:35, 1 August 2011 (EDT) | Two things: 1. Wikipedia is not a source; 2. this website will not post a scientific ''theory'' as if it's a ''fact''. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:35, 1 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
If you are new to wiki-style websites, how were you able to post an edit to the Dinosaur article, with a source, as well as hitting the revert function a couple times? It's pretty easy, as you already know. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:48, 1 August 2011 (EDT) | If you are new to wiki-style websites, how were you able to post an edit to the Dinosaur article, with a source, as well as hitting the revert function a couple times? It's pretty easy, as you already know. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:48, 1 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:20, August 1, 2011
Sounds like someone failed science class! Karajou, a scientific theory is as good as fact, and the bull passed around on here as fact is much closer to opinion than any thing scientists present.
Two things: 1. Wikipedia is not a source; 2. this website will not post a scientific theory as if it's a fact. Karajou 14:35, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
If you are new to wiki-style websites, how were you able to post an edit to the Dinosaur article, with a source, as well as hitting the revert function a couple times? It's pretty easy, as you already know. Karajou 14:48, 1 August 2011 (EDT)