Difference between revisions of "Talk:Question evolution! campaign"
(Created page with "Do we want these 15 questions answered? I can answer some of them right here --~~~~") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Do we want these 15 questions answered? I can answer some of them right here --[[User:HarabecW|HarabecW]] 14:27, 20 June 2011 (EDT) | Do we want these 15 questions answered? I can answer some of them right here --[[User:HarabecW|HarabecW]] 14:27, 20 June 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'll answer some now, I may not be able to get to all of them right now. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. How did life originate? | ||
| + | Evolution does not deal with the origins of life, it deals only with it's diversity. The dictionary definition of evolution is "change in the gene pool of a population from generation to generation by such processes as mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift." | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2. How did the DNA code originate? | ||
| + | I do not have the background to properly answer this question | ||
| + | |||
| + | 3. How could mutations create huge volumes of information in living things? | ||
| + | What is "information" in this context? This is never defined. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 4. Why is natural selection taught as‘evolution’ as if it explains the origin of the diversity of life? | ||
| + | Natural selection is the mechanism that works with speciation to produce an effect we call evolution. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 5. How did new biochemical pathways, which involve multiple enzymes working together in sequence, originate? | ||
| + | I do not have the background to properly answer this question | ||
| + | |||
| + | 6. Living things look like they were designed, so how do evolutionists know that they were not designed? | ||
| + | Because we can see many examples of things we know and can see were designed naturally but look like they should have been designed by human hands. The snowflake is a prime example; it appears extremely complex and designed however we know snowflakes are formed via natural processes. Living things also dont appear designed, at least not designed by anyone with any sense. The human body has some quite complex features but if taken as a whole, it's incredibly poorly thought out. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 7. How did multi-cellular life originate? | ||
| + | I do not have the background to properly answer this question | ||
| + | |||
| + | 8. How did sex originate? | ||
| + | I do not have the background to properly answer this question | ||
| + | |||
| + | 9. Why are the countless millions of transitional fossils missing? | ||
| + | Simply, they arent. We have BOATLOADS of fossils and scientists have spent a great deal of time arguing just were in the evolutionary spectrum many of them fit. Fossils themselves are uncommon simply because the conditions necessary to form them are rare, but we have an incredibly diverse fossil record already (http://www.transitionalfossils.com/) | ||
| + | |||
| + | 10. How do ‘living fossils’ remain unchanged over supposed hundreds of millions of years, if evolution has changed worms into humans in the same time frame? | ||
| + | Evolution has not changed "worms into humans." These organisms havent changed because they have had very little evolutionary pressure to do so, they are very well adapted to their environment. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 11. How did blind chemistry create mind/ intelligence, meaning, altruism and morality? | ||
| + | It didnt, humans did. These are names we have given to things that help us reinforce our social groups, one of the key reasons humans have become dominant. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 12. Why is evolutionary ‘just-so’ storytelling tolerated? | ||
| + | It isnt. If you can demonstrate another theory that explains what evolution explains in a better way with more data, prepare a place on your mantle for a Nobel. Science encourages informed dissent. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 13. Where are the scientific breakthroughs due to evolution? | ||
| + | There are far too many to list here, most of our modern understanding of biochemistry, genetics, and large parts of our medical science rest on evolution being factual; if it werent, these sciences simply wouldnt work. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 14. Science involves experimenting to figure out how things work; how they operate. Why is evolution, a theory about history, taught as if it is the same as this operational science? | ||
| + | Evolution is not a theory about history, it is an on-going biological process. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 15. Why is a fundamentally religious idea, a dogmatic belief system that fails to explain the evidence, taught in science classes? | ||
| + | Evolution is not a religious idea. | ||
| + | --[[User:HarabecW|HarabecW]] 20:13, 23 June 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:13, June 24, 2011
Do we want these 15 questions answered? I can answer some of them right here --HarabecW 14:27, 20 June 2011 (EDT)
I'll answer some now, I may not be able to get to all of them right now.
1. How did life originate? Evolution does not deal with the origins of life, it deals only with it's diversity. The dictionary definition of evolution is "change in the gene pool of a population from generation to generation by such processes as mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift."
2. How did the DNA code originate? I do not have the background to properly answer this question
3. How could mutations create huge volumes of information in living things? What is "information" in this context? This is never defined.
4. Why is natural selection taught as‘evolution’ as if it explains the origin of the diversity of life? Natural selection is the mechanism that works with speciation to produce an effect we call evolution.
5. How did new biochemical pathways, which involve multiple enzymes working together in sequence, originate? I do not have the background to properly answer this question
6. Living things look like they were designed, so how do evolutionists know that they were not designed? Because we can see many examples of things we know and can see were designed naturally but look like they should have been designed by human hands. The snowflake is a prime example; it appears extremely complex and designed however we know snowflakes are formed via natural processes. Living things also dont appear designed, at least not designed by anyone with any sense. The human body has some quite complex features but if taken as a whole, it's incredibly poorly thought out.
7. How did multi-cellular life originate? I do not have the background to properly answer this question
8. How did sex originate? I do not have the background to properly answer this question
9. Why are the countless millions of transitional fossils missing? Simply, they arent. We have BOATLOADS of fossils and scientists have spent a great deal of time arguing just were in the evolutionary spectrum many of them fit. Fossils themselves are uncommon simply because the conditions necessary to form them are rare, but we have an incredibly diverse fossil record already (http://www.transitionalfossils.com/)
10. How do ‘living fossils’ remain unchanged over supposed hundreds of millions of years, if evolution has changed worms into humans in the same time frame? Evolution has not changed "worms into humans." These organisms havent changed because they have had very little evolutionary pressure to do so, they are very well adapted to their environment.
11. How did blind chemistry create mind/ intelligence, meaning, altruism and morality? It didnt, humans did. These are names we have given to things that help us reinforce our social groups, one of the key reasons humans have become dominant.
12. Why is evolutionary ‘just-so’ storytelling tolerated? It isnt. If you can demonstrate another theory that explains what evolution explains in a better way with more data, prepare a place on your mantle for a Nobel. Science encourages informed dissent.
13. Where are the scientific breakthroughs due to evolution? There are far too many to list here, most of our modern understanding of biochemistry, genetics, and large parts of our medical science rest on evolution being factual; if it werent, these sciences simply wouldnt work.
14. Science involves experimenting to figure out how things work; how they operate. Why is evolution, a theory about history, taught as if it is the same as this operational science? Evolution is not a theory about history, it is an on-going biological process.
15. Why is a fundamentally religious idea, a dogmatic belief system that fails to explain the evidence, taught in science classes? Evolution is not a religious idea. --HarabecW 20:13, 23 June 2011 (EDT)