Difference between revisions of "Talk:Anonymous"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "'This article has been proposed for speedy deletion. The reason given is: It is obvious vandalism, sarcastic mockery, or inappropriate according to The Conservapedia Commandments...")
 
m
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
 
Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
 +
 +
: I don't really know much about this purported group, but from what I can find it seems to be a name thrown about by kids who spend too much time on the internet and enjoy pointless vandalism. This article makes them sound almost noble, which is clearly wrong. I think it's you who is biased - take a look around CP and you'll see what an open-minded group of editors can do. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 10:28, 6 June 2011 (EDT)

Revision as of 14:28, June 6, 2011

'This article has been proposed for speedy deletion. The reason given is: It is obvious vandalism, sarcastic mockery, or inappropriate according to The Conservapedia Commandments.'

So I read the Commandments, and found that the only issue from my edit was the lack of references. Something I shall fix if necessary.

I feel my only crime was not agreeing with the overarching bias of this site.

Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong.

I don't really know much about this purported group, but from what I can find it seems to be a name thrown about by kids who spend too much time on the internet and enjoy pointless vandalism. This article makes them sound almost noble, which is clearly wrong. I think it's you who is biased - take a look around CP and you'll see what an open-minded group of editors can do. Jcw 10:28, 6 June 2011 (EDT)