Difference between revisions of "User:ZackMartin"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ZackMartin (talk | contribs) (introduce myself) |
ZackMartin (talk | contribs) (deleting sentence after discussion with Andy Schlafly) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I don't really share Conservapedia's viewpoint, but I don't want to sabotage it either. I think the more POV-specific encyclopedia choices, the better - whether they are my POV or not. Let's have a free market of encyclopedias. | I don't really share Conservapedia's viewpoint, but I don't want to sabotage it either. I think the more POV-specific encyclopedia choices, the better - whether they are my POV or not. Let's have a free market of encyclopedias. | ||
| − | I have written several articles for [http://astorehouseofknowledge.info A Storehouse of Knowledge], I have copied some here when I think they would fit in with this site. I am careful however to only copy what I have written, not any edits by other people. | + | I have written several articles for [http://astorehouseofknowledge.info A Storehouse of Knowledge], I have copied some here when I think they would fit in with this site. I am careful however to only copy what I have written, not any edits by other people. |
Revision as of 04:56, March 27, 2011
I think the main problem with Wikipedia is NPOV (neutral point of view) - in reality, no one can agree on what a neutral point of view is.
I think a much better approach is to have several encyclopedias with competing viewpoints (POVs).
I don't really share Conservapedia's viewpoint, but I don't want to sabotage it either. I think the more POV-specific encyclopedia choices, the better - whether they are my POV or not. Let's have a free market of encyclopedias.
I have written several articles for A Storehouse of Knowledge, I have copied some here when I think they would fit in with this site. I am careful however to only copy what I have written, not any edits by other people.