Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bisexual"
m (pic of crowley) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Is the picture of Crowley really neccesary? The quote underneath has nothing to do with his sexuality either. | Is the picture of Crowley really neccesary? The quote underneath has nothing to do with his sexuality either. | ||
If you have to have a picture why not have someone more commonly known as being bi, such as David Bowie or William Burroughs. Dan M | If you have to have a picture why not have someone more commonly known as being bi, such as David Bowie or William Burroughs. Dan M | ||
| + | |||
| + | =Typo= | ||
| + | "by the support o disinterested friendship" | ||
| + | I think this should read "support of disinterested". | ||
Revision as of 02:57, December 31, 2010
This article should be improved, not reduced. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 15:14, 11 February 2008 (EST)
I agree, but the Catholic quote is about homosexuality, not bisexuality; and the Yiddish quote is completely irrelevant. Improvement would involve deleting the irrelevant and adding relevant info. Dadsnagem2 15:26, 11 February 2008 (EST)
Occultist
I don't know if the thing about the occultist really belongs here. That said, I'll leave it for at least a couple hours to give people the chance to disagree w/ me here. I don't see why is should stay in the page, but if you post a decent reason her i'll leave it.
Is the picture of Crowley really neccesary? The quote underneath has nothing to do with his sexuality either. If you have to have a picture why not have someone more commonly known as being bi, such as David Bowie or William Burroughs. Dan M
Typo
"by the support o disinterested friendship" I think this should read "support of disinterested".