Difference between revisions of "Debate:If the Bible didn't contain a creation story, would anyone even consider the idea of a young earth?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: In other words, if the Bible started with the story of Abraham and never mentioned how the earth was created, would anyone consider the idea that the earth was not millions of years old? ...) |
Rob Pommer (talk | contribs) m (formatting) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In other words, if the Bible started with the story of Abraham and never mentioned how the earth was created, would anyone consider the idea that the earth was not millions of years old? Or does a desire to prove the Bible correct form the basis of creation science? [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 08:49, 3 April 2007 (EDT) | In other words, if the Bible started with the story of Abraham and never mentioned how the earth was created, would anyone consider the idea that the earth was not millions of years old? Or does a desire to prove the Bible correct form the basis of creation science? [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 08:49, 3 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==YES!== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==No!== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Comments== | ||
Revision as of 12:56, April 3, 2007
In other words, if the Bible started with the story of Abraham and never mentioned how the earth was created, would anyone consider the idea that the earth was not millions of years old? Or does a desire to prove the Bible correct form the basis of creation science? Czolgolz 08:49, 3 April 2007 (EDT)