Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gerontology"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (moved Talk:Gerontologist to Talk:Gerontology) |
(to Karajou) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Pseudoscience? How so? | Pseudoscience? How so? | ||
:Perhaps you could come up with an interesting article about the subject - perhaps with proof that it is not a pseudoscience - instead of sitting in England somewhere doing nothing more than being a critic. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:40, 28 October 2010 (EDT) | :Perhaps you could come up with an interesting article about the subject - perhaps with proof that it is not a pseudoscience - instead of sitting in England somewhere doing nothing more than being a critic. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:40, 28 October 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::There is some pseudoscience in this field, but some of it '''might''' still be real science. Anyway, I rearranged and renamed the article. Cheers! :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:52, 28 October 2010 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:52, October 28, 2010
Pseudoscience? How so?
- Perhaps you could come up with an interesting article about the subject - perhaps with proof that it is not a pseudoscience - instead of sitting in England somewhere doing nothing more than being a critic. Karajou 14:40, 28 October 2010 (EDT)