Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Delete Notice"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(describe optional parameter)
 
(oops, that doesn't go to the right template)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
One of my biggest issue with this site is its underutilization of namespaces, particularly the Conservapedia: namespace.  AFD's in particular are the sort of group of pages that is likely to grow endlessly, and that will clutter up mainspace if allowed to.  As such, I added an optional parameter that allows AFD pages to be put in Conservapedia: namespace by using <tt><nowiki>{{delete notice|namespace=Conservapedia:}}</nowiki></tt> to nominate a page.  I didn't want to make a big change, so this is optional, but I really think it should be preferred over putting AFD discussions right alongside normal articles.  --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 10:14, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
+
One of my biggest issue with this site is its underutilization of namespaces, particularly the Conservapedia: namespace.  AFD's in particular are the sort of group of pages that is likely to grow endlessly, and that will clutter up mainspace if allowed to.  As such, I added an optional parameter that allows AFD pages to be put in Conservapedia: namespace by using <tt><nowiki>{{Delete Notice|namespace=Conservapedia:}}</nowiki></tt> to nominate a page.  I didn't want to make a big change, so this is optional, but I really think it should be preferred over putting AFD discussions right alongside normal articles.  --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 10:14, 19 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 05:10, April 2, 2007

One of my biggest issue with this site is its underutilization of namespaces, particularly the Conservapedia: namespace. AFD's in particular are the sort of group of pages that is likely to grow endlessly, and that will clutter up mainspace if allowed to. As such, I added an optional parameter that allows AFD pages to be put in Conservapedia: namespace by using {{Delete Notice|namespace=Conservapedia:}} to nominate a page. I didn't want to make a big change, so this is optional, but I really think it should be preferred over putting AFD discussions right alongside normal articles. --Interiot 10:14, 19 March 2007 (EDT)