Difference between revisions of "Talk:Censorability"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(right ... what's next, demanding a source for an arithmetic calculation?) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:: Right. What's next, demanding a source for an arithmetic calculation?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:02, 27 May 2010 (EDT) | :: Right. What's next, demanding a source for an arithmetic calculation?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:02, 27 May 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::so, you're refusing to simply cite a source, which I "requested". My mind is open, i just wanted this page to adhere to the Conservapedia Commandments. also, some cites with maths would be nice, because it would give the population links to further information. --[[User:Johnb|Johnb]] 21:22, 27 May 2010 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 01:22, May 28, 2010
andy, could we have some sources??? --Johnb 19:04, 27 May 2010 (EDT)
- John, censorability is as logical a concept as the idea that 2+2=4. I suppose you also require "sources" for such logical truths as the positive effects of school prayer and of reading the Bible. Open your mind. EdwardS 19:14, 27 May 2010 (EDT)
- Right. What's next, demanding a source for an arithmetic calculation?--Andy Schlafly 21:02, 27 May 2010 (EDT)
- so, you're refusing to simply cite a source, which I "requested". My mind is open, i just wanted this page to adhere to the Conservapedia Commandments. also, some cites with maths would be nice, because it would give the population links to further information. --Johnb 21:22, 27 May 2010 (EDT)