Difference between revisions of "User talk:JohnS001"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Perhaps, but we have (I believe) a policy against edit wars. Also please cite your sources. Thanks. --[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] <sub>[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]</sub> 11:25, 22 May 2010 (EDT) | Perhaps, but we have (I believe) a policy against edit wars. Also please cite your sources. Thanks. --[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] <sub>[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]</sub> 11:25, 22 May 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sorry, Ben, but I really couldn't care less about you beliefs. Now, if you'd rather state that "there is a policy", that's better (for note, use of the term "belief" implies uncertainty on your part, and I would hope that an admin is certain of the site rules). And I would hardly count correcting an incorrect edit as an "edit war", especially seeing as that's exactly what the purpose of this site is, if I recall the purpose statement and Andy's interviews correctly. --[[User:JohnS001|JohnS001]] 13:26, 22 May 2010 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:26, May 22, 2010
I reverted your edit, not because it was wrong (I don't think it was), but it was placed wrong. If possible, do a rewrite using a sandbox describe the wall, it dimensions, its function, and its weaknesses...which is where your edit should be placed. Any ancient accounts as citations would help. Karajou 14:17, 17 May 2010 (EDT)
Actually, my edit fits perfectly there, as: 1) the original point (which I corrected) was there and 2) that section is a discussion of the purpose of the wall, which is exactly what my edit covered. --JohnS001 11:13, 22 May 2010 (EDT)
Perhaps, but we have (I believe) a policy against edit wars. Also please cite your sources. Thanks. --Ben Talk 11:25, 22 May 2010 (EDT)
Sorry, Ben, but I really couldn't care less about you beliefs. Now, if you'd rather state that "there is a policy", that's better (for note, use of the term "belief" implies uncertainty on your part, and I would hope that an admin is certain of the site rules). And I would hardly count correcting an incorrect edit as an "edit war", especially seeing as that's exactly what the purpose of this site is, if I recall the purpose statement and Andy's interviews correctly. --JohnS001 13:26, 22 May 2010 (EDT)