Difference between revisions of "Atheism and Miracles"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Replaced content with 'TK HAS AUTHORIZED THIS DESTRUCTION')
Line 1: Line 1:
−
In regards to '''atheism and miracles''', modern scholars are divided on the issue of whether or not [[David Hume]] was an [[atheism|atheist]].<ref>http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hume-religion/#10</ref>  With that caveat in mind, Hume is well known for arguing that it is always more probable that the testimony of a miracle is false than that the miracle occurred.<ref>http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/docs/creation-providence.html</ref> Christian apologists [[William Lane Craig]], [[Norman Geisler]], [[C.S. Lewis]], [[JP Holding]], and others have shown the inadequacy and unreasonableness of Hume's position regarding miracles. <ref>http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/docs/creation-providence.html</ref><ref>http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/docs/miracles.html</ref><ref>http://www.ses.edu/journal/articles/2.1Hoffman.pdf</ref><ref>http://www.leaderu.com/truth/1truth19.html</ref><ref>http://www.cslewisinstitute.org/pages/resources/publications/knowingDoing/2004/Miracles.pdf</ref> <ref>http://www.tektonics.org/gk/hume01.html</ref> <ref>http://www.comereason.org/phil_qstn/phi060.asp</ref>
+
TK HAS AUTHORIZED THIS DESTRUCTION
−
 
 
−
Impossibly high standards are often set for miracles to be accepted including requirements such as multiple doctor's testimonies from before and after a medical miracle may have occurred along with x-rays and other confidential medical information being made public. When such evidence is produced it is simply stated to be inadequate or fraudulent.
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
{{Nb Atheism}}
 
−
 
 
−
== Notes ==
 
−
{{reflist|2}}
 
−
 
 
−
[[Category:Atheism]]
 

Revision as of 22:35, May 3, 2010

TK HAS AUTHORIZED THIS DESTRUCTION

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atheism_and_Miracles&oldid=775057"